Impuestos locales › Condado de Clarke › Osceola

Ciudad

Osceola

Condado de Clarke · Cómo funcionan las ciudades

$3,660 al añode impuesto a la propiedad sobre una casa de $200,000 aquí, FY27, para todos los gobiernos locales ($43.45 por cada $1,000 de valor gravable)1
$1,210 al añode eso va a la ciudad ($14.37 por cada $1,000)
$3.2Mimpuesto a la propiedad que cobra la ciudad, FY27
$20.3Mpresupuesto de la ciudad, FY27, sin los servicios municipales (todavía sin informar)2

Quién la dirige

El concejo municipal aprueba las ordenanzas, adopta el presupuesto y fija el impuesto a la propiedad de la ciudad.

  • Dan HooperOsceola City Council Ward 2 · elegido el 4 de noviembre de 2025
  • Mel MillerOsceola City Council At-Large · elegido el 4 de noviembre de 2025
  • Thomas KedleyOsceola Mayor · elegido el 4 de noviembre de 2025
  • Dan HooperOsceola City Council Ward 1 · elegido el 7 de noviembre de 2023
  • George FotiadisOsceola City Council At-Large · elegido el 7 de noviembre de 2023
  • Sonya HicksOsceola City Council Ward 3 · elegido el 7 de noviembre de 2023

Los funcionarios se deducen de los resultados de las elecciones: cada miembro cuyo mandato de cuatro años sigue corriendo, más los nombramientos y cargos que le informaron a Iowa Funnel. Puede que una renuncia todavía no aparezca.

Reuniones y agendas

Lo que está decidiendo el concejo: cada agenda, sus resoluciones y ordenanzas, y un resumen sencillo. Las agendas y los resúmenes están en inglés.

Iowa Funnel todavía no lee las agendas de esta ciudad. Todo concejo y junta publica su agenda al menos 24 horas antes de reunirse.

Impuestos a la propiedad

Cómo se cobra la cuenta · Para qué es cada cobro

Quién recibe la cuenta del impuesto a la propiedad en Osceola

Las casas y los negocios de casi todo Osceola pagan una tasa combinada de $43.45 por cada $1,000 de valor gravable (FY27). La pagan toda al tesorero del condado de Clarke, que le pasa a cada gobierno su parte; la ciudad fija y recibe solo su propia parte, $14.37. Calcule su cuenta (en inglés).

Las tasas con los años

Por cada $1,000 de valor gravable: la tasa combinada típica que pagan los habitantes de Osceola, y la parte propia del gobierno de la ciudad.

AñoCombinadaDe la ciudad
FY20$42.80$14.33
FY21$42.66$14.48
FY22$42.80$14.49
FY23$41.74$14.24
FY24$43.13$14.71
FY25$43.88$14.77
FY26$44.41$14.78
FY27$43.45$14.37
Ver los números
AñoCombinadaDe la ciudad
FY20$42.80$14.33
FY21$42.66$14.48
FY22$42.80$14.49
FY23$41.74$14.24
FY24$43.13$14.71
FY25$43.88$14.77
FY26$44.41$14.78
FY27$43.45$14.37

Comparado con lugares de este tamaño3

La tasa del impuesto a la propiedad de la ciudad de Osceola, $14.37 por cada $1,000, es la 21.ª más baja de 58 ciudades de Iowa con 3,700–8,300 habitantes. La del medio del grupo es $14.92.

Red Oak: $20.65Oelwein: $20.16Independence: $19.01Iowa Falls: $18.86Denison: $18.69West Liberty: $18.68Chariton: $18.37Perry: $17.91Atlantic: $17.48Knoxville: $17.46Clarinda: $17.25Centerville: $16.85Algona: $16.75Webster City: $16.51Vinton: $16.25Winterset: $16.15Cresco: $16.13Humboldt: $16.00Anamosa: $15.95Charles City: $15.95Forest City: $15.77Decorah: $15.52Sheldon: $15.33Estherville: $15.27Washington: $15.21Harlan: $15.07Shenandoah: $15.02Creston: $14.99Manchester: $14.96Jefferson: $14.88Hampton: $14.86Carlisle: $14.82Cherokee: $14.82Glenwood: $14.77Waukon: $14.76Nevada: $14.58Monticello: $14.49Windsor Heights: $14.30Orange City: $14.01Hiawatha: $13.78Rock Valley: $13.76Sergeant Bluff: $13.70Mount Vernon: $13.50Adel: $13.43Maquoketa: $12.85Camanche: $12.75Le Claire: $12.64Tiffin: $11.80Huxley: $11.68Polk City: $11.00Carter Lake: $10.67Dyersville: $10.27Spirit Lake: $10.17Clear Lake: $9.85Asbury: $8.32Eldridge: $8.13Evansdale: $8.00Osceola: $14.37$8.00 la más baja$20.65 la más altamedio
Ver los 58
#LugarTasa por $1,000Habitantes
1Red Oak$20.655,420
2Oelwein$20.165,788
3Independence$19.016,266
4Iowa Falls$18.864,993
5Denison$18.698,302
6West Liberty$18.683,724
7Chariton$18.374,278
8Perry$17.918,046
9Atlantic$17.486,717
10Knoxville$17.467,440
11Clarinda$17.255,334
12Centerville$16.855,345
13Algona$16.755,341
14Webster City$16.517,763
15Vinton$16.254,962
16Winterset$16.155,421
17Cresco$16.133,890
18Humboldt$16.004,774
19Anamosa$15.955,845
20Charles City$15.957,081
21Forest City$15.774,199
22Decorah$15.527,454
23Sheldon$15.335,584
24Estherville$15.275,796
25Washington$15.217,281
26Harlan$15.074,898
27Shenandoah$15.024,878
28Creston$14.997,421
29Manchester$14.965,283
30Jefferson$14.884,148
31Hampton$14.864,340
32Carlisle$14.824,381
33Cherokee$14.825,186
34Glenwood$14.775,250
35Waukon$14.763,799
36Nevada$14.587,082
37Monticello$14.494,095
38Osceola$14.375,585
39Windsor Heights$14.305,106
40Orange City$14.016,547
41Hiawatha$13.787,347
42Rock Valley$13.764,024
43Sergeant Bluff$13.705,335
44Mount Vernon$13.504,518
45Adel$13.436,763
46Maquoketa$12.856,064
47Camanche$12.754,536
48Le Claire$12.644,776
49Tiffin$11.806,695
50Huxley$11.684,737
51Polk City$11.006,430
52Carter Lake$10.673,752
53Dyersville$10.274,559
54Spirit Lake$10.175,548
55Clear Lake$9.857,602
56Asbury$8.326,051
57Eldridge$8.136,967
58Evansdale$8.004,515

El límite de $8.10

El cobro general de Osceola es de $7.97 por cada $1,000 de valor gravable en el FY27, $0.13 por debajo del límite.4 465 de 934 ciudades de Iowa tienen un cobro general más alto. Todas las ciudades (en inglés).

FY23 $8.10 · FY24 $8.10 · FY25 $8.21 · FY26 $8.21 · FY27 $7.97 (antes del FY25, solo el cobro general)

Fuera del límite: $6.40 más5

  • Debt Service Levy$2.79 · $659,928
  • Total Employee Benefit Levies$2.26 · $490,271
  • Liability, property & self insurance costs$1.35 · $294,163

Financiamiento por incremento de impuestos (TIF)

$19.2M del valor gravable de Osceola está en el incremento de distritos TIF (el 8% del valor gravable de la ciudad), tasaciones de 2025, que pagan impuestos en el FY27.6 Presupuestó $634,370 de ingresos TIF para el FY25.

$657,791
$612,641

Lo que ese valor recaudaría con la tasa de cada gobierno, FY277

Los impuestos sobre el valor TIF van al fondo TIF de la ciudad en lugar de a los gobiernos que los cobran, incluidos unos $222,783 de la propia ciudad.

  • Escuelas de Clarke$230,647
  • Condado de Clarke$145,110
AñoIngresos TIF
FY16$544,962
FY17$490,686
FY18$551,828
FY19$582,855
FY20$657,791
FY21$639,795
FY22$607,039
FY23$612,641
Ver los números
AñoIngresos TIF
FY16$544,962
FY17$490,686
FY18$551,828
FY19$582,855
FY20$657,791
FY21$639,795
FY22$607,039
FY23$612,641

Los cobros de la ciudad, FY27

Lo que la ciudad recauda con cada cobro. La ley estatal pone un tope al cobro general; los demás están apartados para un solo fin. Los nombres oficiales están en inglés.

  • Consolidate General Fund$1.7M55%
  • Debt Service Levy$659,92821%
  • Total Employee Benefit Levies$490,27115%
  • Liability, property & self insurance costs$294,1639%

Presupuesto y gastos

Cómo leer un presupuesto local

Adónde va cada dólar del presupuesto de Osceola, FY26

Business Type / Enterprise: 45¢ de cada dólar45¢Capital Projects: 17¢ de cada dólar17¢Debt Service: 13¢ de cada dólar13¢Public Safety: 9¢ de cada dólar9¢Culture and Recreation: 6¢ de cada dólarTodo lo demás: 10¢ de cada dólar10¢

El gasto previsto de todos los fondos, incluidos los servicios que maneja la ciudad, como el agua y el alcantarillado (“business type”), que algunas ciudades tienen y otras no. Se dejan fuera las transferencias entre fondos. “Ciudades de este tamaño” es el promedio de las 57 ciudades de Iowa de tamaño más parecido (3,700–8,300 habitantes).

Adónde vaDe cada dólarCiudades de este tamaño (57)
Business Type / Enterprise45¢36¢
Capital Projects17¢20¢
Debt Service13¢7¢
Public Safety9¢13¢
Culture and Recreation6¢8¢
Todo lo demás10¢16¢

Gasto previsto, FY27

Todos los fondos: impuesto a la propiedad, tarifas de servicios y otras, dinero estatal y federal. “Business type” son los servicios y negocios de la ciudad, como el agua o el alcantarillado. Los nombres de las partidas están en inglés.

  • Capital Projects$11.9M59%
  • Public Safety$2.0M10%
  • Debt Service$1.7M9%
  • Public Works$1.7M8%
  • Culture and Recreation$1.6M8%
  • General Government$1.1M5%
  • Community and Economic Development$344,2002%

El archivo del FY27 del estado todavía no incluye business type / enterprise ($7.4M en el FY26), así que este total es bajo.

El presupuesto comparado con lo que gastó, FY23
FunciónPresupuestoGastado
Public Works$1.5M$1.9M
Public Safety$1.5M$1.7M
Health and Social Services$0$0
General Government$845,839$1.1M
Debt Service$2.2M$2.5M
Culture and Recreation$1.4M$971,890
Community and Economic Development$615,700$910,263
Capital Projects$30.6M$12.9M
Business Type / Enterprise$5.0M$8.4M

Lo que gastó cada año

Sin FY248

$39.7M
$30.3M

Deuda, reservas y auditorías

Cómo funciona la deuda local · Lo que dice una auditoría

Lo que debe Osceola

$42.2M al 30 de junio de 2026: $7,802 por habitante. Puesto 42.º en deuda por habitante entre 939 gobiernos de su tipo de Iowa (la lista).9

$46.3M
$42.2M
30 de junioDeudaPor habitante
2026$42.2M$7,802
2025$45.1M$8,320
2024$42.2M$7,784
2023$43.3M$7,990
2022$46.3M$8,542
2021$20.7M$3,825
2020$16.4M$3,029
2019$18.2M$3,355
2018$14.6M$2,695
2017$15.8M$2,921
2016$12.6M$2,326
2015$12.3M$2,280
2014$13.4M$2,477
2013$16.2M$2,992
2012$17.6M$3,245
2011$16.4M$3,036
2010$19.0M$3,514
Ver los números
30 de junioDeudaPor habitante
2026$42.2M$7,802
2025$45.1M$8,320
2024$42.2M$7,784
2023$43.3M$7,990
2022$46.3M$8,542
2021$20.7M$3,825
2020$16.4M$3,029
2019$18.2M$3,355
2018$14.6M$2,695
2017$15.8M$2,921
2016$12.6M$2,326
2015$12.3M$2,280
2014$13.4M$2,477
2013$16.2M$2,992
2012$17.6M$3,245
2011$16.4M$3,036
2010$19.0M$3,514

Subió 122% desde 2010.

El límite del 5%10

La deuda de obligación general es de $13.4M, 72% del límite de unos $18.6M (el 5% de $372.4M, el valor completo de su propiedad gravable en 2024).

7 obligaciones al 30 de junio de 2026
TipoParaSe termina de pagarDeuda
Revenue BondsNew Waste Water Treatment Plan, per DNR order2052$26.2M
General ObligationDemolition of 101/103 W Wash, housing, pool rehab, PD equipment, CIP, Comp PLan2044$6.7M
General Obligationrefinance of industrial park bond, new CIP money for E Street Paving, The Meadows, and Marina Parking, Downtown2035$4.2M
Revenue BondsRevenue Bond for Washington St, S Fillmore, and Force Main Sewer Projects and Old Plant combined two bonds in 20202033$2.7M
General ObligationIssued to fund land acquisition for new drinking water supply. Issued on an annual appropriation basis.2028$1.5M
General ObligationRefinance $500,000 Street Bond, $500,000 UR Bond, New money for demo fund, PD capital, landfill, snow plow2034$965,000
General ObligationRefi of casino rev bond into annual app bond for CCRC project PAID OFF EARLY2031$0

Los bonos de obligación general se pagan con el impuesto a la propiedad; los bonos de ingresos y los préstamos, con las tarifas o los ingresos a los que están ligados. En el sitio de la Tesorería (en inglés)

Dinero en reserva

Los archivos de presupuesto del estado no incluyen los saldos de los fondos de las ciudades11. La auditoría más reciente de Osceola los tiene: Financial Statement, period ending Monday, June 30, 2025 (PDF).

Auditorías12

La más reciente: Financial Statement del período que termina el 30 de junio de 2025 (PDF, en inglés), publicada el 31 de marzo de 2026, hecha por una firma de contadores públicos.

Resumen con IA13 (en inglés)

  • The auditors found that too few employees are handling financial tasks, meaning one person often manages multiple steps like handling cash, recording transactions, and reconciling bank accounts, which increases the risk of errors or theft.
  • Errors were found in how money was moved between funds, how certain payments were classified, and how receipts and disbursements were recorded, requiring significant adjustments to the financial statements.
  • The city does not deposit receipts daily, has not fully implemented a standard chart of accounts, and failed to perform complete reconciliations between bank accounts and the general ledger.
  • The city stated it will review its control procedures, attempt to implement new recording and deposit policies, and is working with an outside accounting firm to fix bank reconciliation issues.
Los hallazgos, tal como los dice el informe (en inglés)
Schedule of Findings Year Ended June 30, 2025 Part I: Findings Related to the Financial Statements: INTERNAL CONTROL DEFICIENCIES: 2025-001 Segregation of Duties Criteria — Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the City of Osceola's (City) financial statements. Condition — Generally, one or two individuals have control over each of the following areas for the City: 1) Cash — reconciling bank accounts, initiating cash receipts and handling and recording cash. 2) Investments — detailed record keeping, custody and reconciling. 3) Inventory — recording and reconciling. 4) Long-term debt — recording and reconciling. 5) Receipts — collecting, depositing, posting and reconciling. 6) Accounting system — performing all general accounting functions and having custody of City assets. 7) Disbursements — preparing checks, signing checks and access to the accounting records. 8) Petty cash — custody, reconciling and recording. 9) Payroll — recordkeeping, preparation and distribution. Cause — The City has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect — Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the City's ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation — The City should review its control activities to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff. Response — The City will review its control procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible with the limited staff it has. Conclusion — Response acknowledged. 2025-002 Preparation of Financial Statements Criteria - A properly designed system of internal control over financial reporting includes the preparation of an entity's financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements by internal personnel of the entity. -40- ### Page 41 City of Osceola Schedule of Findings Year Ended June 30, 2025 Condition - As auditors, we were requested to draft the financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements. It is the responsibility of management and those charged with governance to make the decision whether to accept the degree of risk associated with this condition because of cost or other considerations. Cause - We recognize that with a limited number of office employees, preparation of the financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements is difficult. Effect - The effect of this condition is that the year-end financial reporting is prepared by a party outside of the City. The outside party does not have the constant contact with ongoing financial transactions. Recommendation - We recommend that City officials continue reviewing operating procedures in order to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances to enable staff to draft the financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements internally. Response — These are very technical issues that the average citizen would not understand. This issue relates to auditor independence issues, and we accept the risk associated with not being able to prepare these documents and apply accounting principles in accordance with an other comprehensive basis of accounting. Conclusion — Response acknowledged. 2025-003 Material Adjustments Criteria — A deficiency in internal control over financial reporting exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements of the financial statements on a timely basis. Properly designed policies and procedures and implementation of the policies and procedures are an integral part of ensuring the reliability and accuracy of the City's financial statements. Condition — We noted that various interfund transfers were not properly recorded. Commercial/Industrial Replacement Claim Payments were not properly classified on the accounting system. Also, some receipts were credited to incorrect funds, and some disbursements were paid from incorrect funds. Cause — City policies do not require and procedures have not been established to provide for an independent review of receipts and disbursements to ensure the City's financial statements are accurate. Effect — Lack of City policies and procedures resulted in City employees not detecting the errors in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. As a result, material adjustments to the City's financial statements were necessary. Recommendation — The City should establish procedures to ensure all receipts and disbursements are properly recorded and reported in the City's financial statements. Response — The City will attempt to implement this recommendation. Conclusion — Response acknowledged. -41- ### Page 42 City of Osceola Schedule of Findings Year Ended June 30, 2025 2025-004 Receipts Criteria — A deficiency in internal control over financial reporting exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements of the financial statements on a timely basis. Properly designed policies and procedures and implementation of the policies and procedures are an integral part of ensuring the reliability and accuracy of the City's financial statement. Condition — Receipts are not deposited timely by the City. Currently, receipts are deposited to the bank within 2-3 days after receipt. Cause — City policies do not require and procedures have not been established to ensure all receipts are deposited timely. Effect — Lack of City policies and procedures resulted in City employees not depositing timely. Recommendation — The City should establish procedures to ensure all receipts are deposited timely, preferably on a daily basis. Response — We will attempt to implement this recommendation. Conclusion — Response acknowledged. 2025-005 Chart of Accounts Criteria — An effective internal control system provides for internal controls related to accurate and complete financial reporting. Condition — The City has not fully implemented the recommended Uniform Chart of Accounts for Iowa City Governments approved by the City Finance Committee. Cause — City policies and procedures have not been established to require the use of the Uniform Chart of Accounts. Effect — Not using a uniform chart account could result in inaccurate or incomplete financial reporting. Recommendation — To provide better financial information and control, the City should establish policies and procedures to require the use of the recommended Uniform Chart of Accounts, or its equivalent. Response — We will look at implementing a chart of accounts for the City. Conclusion — Response acknowledged. 2025-006 Bank Reconciliations Criteria — An effective internal control system provides for internal controls related to reconciling monthly financial reports to all bank accounts and investments. Condition — Although monthly bank reconciliations were prepared for individual bank accounts and investments, the reconciliations are not complied to show a complete reconciliation of all accounts with the general ledger. -42- ### Page 43 City of Osceola Schedule of Findings Year Ended June 30, 2025 Cause — Policies have not been established and procedures have not been implemented to prepare a complete bank reconciliation of all accounts and investments. Effect — Lack of performing and maintaining bank reconciliations could result in unrecorded transactions, undetected errors and opportunity for misappropriation. Recommendation — The City should establish procedures to ensure bank and investment account balances are reconciled to the general ledger monthly. Variances, if any, should be reviewed and resolved timely. Procedures should be established to ensure all financial reports reconcile and include all City activity. Response — Beginning with an effective date of June 30, 2025, this recommendation has been implemented. An outside accounting firm is assisting us with these reconciliations in fiscal year 2026. This should not be an issue in fiscal year 2026 and beyond. Conclusion — Response acknowledged. INSTANCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE: No matters were noted. -43- ### Page 44 City of Osceola Schedule of Findings Year Ended June 30, 2025 Part 11: Other Findings Related to Required Statutory Reporting: 2025-A Certified Budget — Disbursements during the year ended June 30, 2025 exceeded the amounts budgeted in the public works, community and economic development, general government and the business type activities functions. Chapter 384.20 of the Code of Iowa states, in part, "Public monies may not be expended or encumbered except under an annual or continuing appropriation." Recommendation — The budget should have been amended in accordance with Chapter 384.18 of the Code of Iowa before disbursements were allowed to exceed the budget. Response — The budget will be amended in the future, if applicable. Conclusion — Response acknowledged 2025-B Questionable Disbursements — No disbursements we believe may not meet the requirements of public purpose as defined in an Attorney General's opinion dated April 25, 1979 were noted. 2025-C Travel Expense — No disbursements of City of Osceola (City) money for travel expenses of spouses of City officials or employees were noted. 2025-D Business Transactions — No business transactions between the City and City officials or employees of the primary government were noted. 2025-E Restricted Donor Activity — No transactions were noted between the City, City officials, City employees and restricted donors in compliance with Chapter 68B of the Code of Iowa. 2025-F Bond Coverage — Surety bond coverage of City officials and employees is in accordance with statutory provisions. The amount of coverage should be reviewed annually to ensure the coverage is adequate for current operations. 2025-G Council Minutes — Transactions were found that we believe should have been approved in the Council minutes but were not. Some claims were not approved by the City Council. Several claims were not published in the newspaper. Chapter 372.13(6) of the Code of Iowa requires a summary of all receipts and the minutes of the proceedings of the Council be submitted to the newspaper for publication within fifteen days of the City Council meeting. In addition, this same Code Section requires that the City Council approve all claims and these claims be published in the newspaper. Recommendation - The City should implement procedures to ensure that all claims paid are approved by the City Council. The City should also implement procedures to ensure that all claims paid are included in the newspaper publications. Response - We will implement these recommendations. Conclusion - Response acknowledged. 2025-H Deposits and Investments — No instances of non-compliance with the deposit and investment provisions of Chapter 12B and 12C of the Code of Iowa and the City's investment policy were noted. -44- ### Page 45 City of Osceola Schedule of Findings Year Ended June 30, 2025 2025-I Sewer Revenue Bonds — The following instances of non-compliance with the sewer revenue bond resolutions were noted. • The sewer revenue bond resolutions require all users of the system, including the City, be charged for usage. The City is not currently charged for sewer usage. • The sewer revenue bond resolutions require the City to make sufficient monthly transfers to a separate sewer revenue bond sinking accourtt for the purpose of making the bond principal and interest payments when due. The City did not properly fund the sewer revenue bond sinking account each month as required. • The sewer revenue bond resolutions require the City to maintain and establish a sewer reserve fund with a balance of $436,900. While the City did properly establish this fund, this fund is not backed by cash since the cash balance in the Enterprise, Sewer Fund at June 30, 2025 is $93,386. Recommendation — The City should ensure all City departments pay for sewer usage and should make transfers in a timely manner and amount to the sewer revenue bond sinking account for the purpose of making the bond principal and interest payments when due. In addition, the City should ensure the balance in the sewer reserve fund is backed by cash. Response — We will review these recommendations and implement to the best of our ability. To address the lack of cash, we have additional monies available that the City can borrow, plus we will receive a donation in fiscal year 2026. These actions will help secure the financial issues in the Enterprise, Sewer Fund. Conclusion — Response acknowledged. 2025-J Legal Disbursements — The City paid $12,000 to its prior City Attorney in fiscal year 2025. The prior City Attorney does not provide invoices or detail to the City documenting the services provided by the this individual to the City. Recommendation — The City should ensure a written agreement is in place between the City and City Attorney, and adequate detail is provided to the City in relation to work performed by the City Attorney for the City. Response — The City has appointed a new City A
17 informes anteriores de Osceola

Dinero del estado

Lo que el Estado de Iowa le paga a la ciudad cada año, y si se ha mantenido al día con los precios. ¿El dinero del estado se mantiene al día? 14

Lo que el estado le paga a la ciudad cada año

Road Use Tax para las calles, la “reposición” (backfill) del impuesto comercial e industrial y el reembolso de ambulancias, que se pagan cada año por fórmula: $769,034 en el FY25, subió un 21% desde el FY19 mientras los precios subieron un 25%, así que compra un 4% menos. Las subvenciones están más abajo.

Ver los números
FuenteFY22FY23FY24FY25
Road Use Tax (calles)$736,418$745,165$764,883$769,034

Subvenciones y dinero para proyectos

Las subvenciones estatales y el dinero para proyectos concretos (caminos, desarrollo, recursos naturales) cambian según lo que la ciudad pide y gana, así que no cuentan como el apoyo regular del estado.

$298,324
$3,537
  • Subvenciones estatales$3,537100%
AñoSubvenciones y proyectos
FY19$94,085
FY20$19,600
FY21$0
FY22$29,834
FY23$298,324
FY24$0
FY25$3,537
Ver los números
AñoSubvenciones y proyectos
FY19$94,085
FY20$19,600
FY21$0
FY22$29,834
FY23$298,324
FY24$0
FY25$3,537

¿Se mantuvo al día con los precios?

Cada fuente del FY19 al FY25, después de la inflación.

  • Road Use Tax (calles)−4%$636,756 → $769,034, subió un 21% desde el FY19 mientras los precios subieron un 25%, así que compra un 4% menos

Lo que el estado cobra para la ciudad

El impuesto local sobre las ventas es un impuesto de la ciudad que aprobaron los votantes; el estado lo cobra junto con el impuesto estatal sobre las ventas y lo devuelve. No es ayuda estatal. Subió un 48% desde el FY19 mientras los precios subieron un 25%, así que compra un 18% más.

$1.3M
$1.2M

Subvenciones federales, para comparar: $324,460 en el FY25.

Incentivos a empresas

Todos los incentivos del estado (en inglés)

Incentivos estatales de desarrollo económico

Capacitación para empleos nuevos de los colegios comunitarios: 8 contratos desde 1995 por $2.7M, para 570 empleos prometidos.

Incentivos en todo el estado (en inglés)

Elecciones

Candidatos a la alcaldía y el concejo municipal

La inscripción de candidatos abre el lunes, 23 de agosto de 2027: en 284 días.

Para la elección del martes, 2 de noviembre de 2027, los candidatos se inscriben del lunes, 23 de agosto de 2027 al jueves, 16 de septiembre de 2027 ante el auditor del condado (o la secretaría municipal, si el auditor la designa para recibirlas)15.

En una ciudad que puede tener una primaria, la inscripción va del lunes, 9 de agosto de 2027 al jueves, 26 de agosto de 2027.

La más reciente: 4 de noviembre de 2025

Ciudad · 3

Contiendas locales de civicAPI y de los auditores de los condados para Osceola; los resultados oficiales están en el sitio del auditor de cada condado.

Quién se inscribió para el martes, 2 de noviembre de 2027

La inscripción de candidatos todavía no abre. Se espera que estos puestos vayan en la boleta.

  • Osceola City Council At-Large
    Lo ocupa ahora: George Fotiadis
  • Osceola City Council Ward 1
    Lo ocupa ahora: Dan Hooper
  • Osceola City Council Ward 2
    Lo ocupa ahora: Thomas Bahls
  • Osceola City Council Ward 3
    Lo ocupa ahora: Sonya Hicks
  • Osceola Mayor
    Lo ocupa ahora: Thomas Kedley

Los candidatos tal como los publican los auditores de los condados y civicAPI; una inscripción puede tardar unos días en aparecer aquí16.

Medidas anteriores en la boleta

  • Public Measure EK7 de noviembre de 2023

    Rechazada Sí 38.1% (255) · No 61.9% (415)

    Se aprueba con más votos a favor que en contra.

Cuándo puede ir una medida en la boleta

  • martes, 2 de marzo de 2027 · sin preguntas sobre bonos ni deuda
  • martes, 14 de septiembre de 2027 · sin preguntas sobre bonos ni deuda
  • martes, 2 de noviembre de 2027 · cualquier pregunta, incluidos los bonos
  • martes, 7 de marzo de 2028 · sin preguntas sobre bonos ni deuda

Los bonos y otros préstamos solo pueden ir en la boleta de noviembre17.

Lugares relacionados

En el Capitolio estatal y en el Congreso18