Local taxes › Clarke County › Osceola

City

Osceola

Clarke County · How cities work

$3,660 a yearproperty tax on a $200,000 home here, FY27, for every local government ($43.45 per $1,000 of taxable value)1
$1,210 a yearof that goes to the city ($14.37 per $1,000)
$3.2Mproperty taxes the city levies, FY27
$20.3Mcity budget, FY27, without city-run utilities (not yet reported)2

Who runs it

The city council passes ordinances, adopts the budget and sets the city’s property tax.

  • Dan HooperOsceola City Council Ward 2 · elected November 4, 2025
  • Mel MillerOsceola City Council At-Large · elected November 4, 2025
  • Thomas KedleyOsceola Mayor · elected November 4, 2025
  • Dan HooperOsceola City Council Ward 1 · elected November 7, 2023
  • George FotiadisOsceola City Council At-Large · elected November 7, 2023
  • Sonya HicksOsceola City Council Ward 3 · elected November 7, 2023

Officials are worked out from election results: every member whose four-year term is still running, plus appointments and titles Iowa Funnel has been told about. A resignation may not show yet.

Meetings and agendas

What the council is deciding: each agenda, the resolutions and ordinances on it, and a plain-language summary.

Iowa Funnel doesn’t read this city’s agendas yet. Every council and board posts its agenda at least 24 hours before it meets.

Property taxes

How the bill is collected · What each levy is for

Who gets a property owner’s tax bill in Osceola

Homes and businesses in most of Osceola pay a combined $43.45 per $1,000 of taxable value (FY27). They pay it all to the Clarke County treasurer, who passes each government its share; the city sets and gets only its own piece, $14.37. Estimate your bill.

  • Clarke schools$16.5738%
  • City of Osceola$14.3733%
  • Clarke County$7.8818%
  • Clarke County Hospital$2.506%
  • Southwestern Community College$1.072%
  • Clarke County Assessor$0.742%
  • Clarke County Extension (ISU Extension and Outreach)$0.31<1%

Rates over time

Per $1,000 of taxable value: the typical combined rate people in Osceola pay, and the city government’s own piece of it.

YearCombinedCity’s own
FY20$42.80$14.33
FY21$42.66$14.48
FY22$42.80$14.49
FY23$41.74$14.24
FY24$43.13$14.71
FY25$43.88$14.77
FY26$44.41$14.78
FY27$43.45$14.37
Show the numbers
YearCombinedCity’s own
FY20$42.80$14.33
FY21$42.66$14.48
FY22$42.80$14.49
FY23$41.74$14.24
FY24$43.13$14.71
FY25$43.88$14.77
FY26$44.41$14.78
FY27$43.45$14.37

Compared with places this size3

Osceola’s city property tax rate of $14.37 per $1,000 is the 21st lowest of 58 Iowa cities with 3,700–8,300 people. The middle of the group is $14.92.

Red Oak: $20.65Oelwein: $20.16Independence: $19.01Iowa Falls: $18.86Denison: $18.69West Liberty: $18.68Chariton: $18.37Perry: $17.91Atlantic: $17.48Knoxville: $17.46Clarinda: $17.25Centerville: $16.85Algona: $16.75Webster City: $16.51Vinton: $16.25Winterset: $16.15Cresco: $16.13Humboldt: $16.00Anamosa: $15.95Charles City: $15.95Forest City: $15.77Decorah: $15.52Sheldon: $15.33Estherville: $15.27Washington: $15.21Harlan: $15.07Shenandoah: $15.02Creston: $14.99Manchester: $14.96Jefferson: $14.88Hampton: $14.86Carlisle: $14.82Cherokee: $14.82Glenwood: $14.77Waukon: $14.76Nevada: $14.58Monticello: $14.49Windsor Heights: $14.30Orange City: $14.01Hiawatha: $13.78Rock Valley: $13.76Sergeant Bluff: $13.70Mount Vernon: $13.50Adel: $13.43Maquoketa: $12.85Camanche: $12.75Le Claire: $12.64Tiffin: $11.80Huxley: $11.68Polk City: $11.00Carter Lake: $10.67Dyersville: $10.27Spirit Lake: $10.17Clear Lake: $9.85Asbury: $8.32Eldridge: $8.13Evansdale: $8.00Osceola: $14.37$8.00 lowest$20.65 highestmiddle
See all 58
#PlaceRate per $1,000People
1Red Oak$20.655,420
2Oelwein$20.165,788
3Independence$19.016,266
4Iowa Falls$18.864,993
5Denison$18.698,302
6West Liberty$18.683,724
7Chariton$18.374,278
8Perry$17.918,046
9Atlantic$17.486,717
10Knoxville$17.467,440
11Clarinda$17.255,334
12Centerville$16.855,345
13Algona$16.755,341
14Webster City$16.517,763
15Vinton$16.254,962
16Winterset$16.155,421
17Cresco$16.133,890
18Humboldt$16.004,774
19Anamosa$15.955,845
20Charles City$15.957,081
21Forest City$15.774,199
22Decorah$15.527,454
23Sheldon$15.335,584
24Estherville$15.275,796
25Washington$15.217,281
26Harlan$15.074,898
27Shenandoah$15.024,878
28Creston$14.997,421
29Manchester$14.965,283
30Jefferson$14.884,148
31Hampton$14.864,340
32Carlisle$14.824,381
33Cherokee$14.825,186
34Glenwood$14.775,250
35Waukon$14.763,799
36Nevada$14.587,082
37Monticello$14.494,095
38Osceola$14.375,585
39Windsor Heights$14.305,106
40Orange City$14.016,547
41Hiawatha$13.787,347
42Rock Valley$13.764,024
43Sergeant Bluff$13.705,335
44Mount Vernon$13.504,518
45Adel$13.436,763
46Maquoketa$12.856,064
47Camanche$12.754,536
48Le Claire$12.644,776
49Tiffin$11.806,695
50Huxley$11.684,737
51Polk City$11.006,430
52Carter Lake$10.673,752
53Dyersville$10.274,559
54Spirit Lake$10.175,548
55Clear Lake$9.857,602
56Asbury$8.326,051
57Eldridge$8.136,967
58Evansdale$8.004,515

The $8.10 limit

Osceola’s general levy is $7.97 per $1,000 of taxable value in FY27, $0.13 below the limit.4 465 of 934 Iowa cities have a higher general levy. All cities.

FY23 $8.10 · FY24 $8.10 · FY25 $8.21 · FY26 $8.21 · FY27 $7.97 (before FY25, the general levy alone)

Outside the limit: $6.40 more5

  • Debt Service Levy$2.79 · $659,928
  • Total Employee Benefit Levies$2.26 · $490,271
  • Liability, property & self insurance costs$1.35 · $294,163

Tax increment financing (TIF)

$19.2M of taxable value in Osceola is in TIF districts’ increment (8% of the city’s taxable value), 2025 valuations, taxed in FY27.6 It budgeted $634,370 in TIF revenue for FY25.

$657,791
$612,641

What that value would raise at each government’s rate, FY277

Taxes on TIF value go to the city’s TIF fund instead of the governments that levy them, including about $222,783 of the city’s own.

  • Clarke schools$230,647
  • Clarke County$145,110
YearTIF revenue
FY16$544,962
FY17$490,686
FY18$551,828
FY19$582,855
FY20$657,791
FY21$639,795
FY22$607,039
FY23$612,641
Show the numbers
YearTIF revenue
FY16$544,962
FY17$490,686
FY18$551,828
FY19$582,855
FY20$657,791
FY21$639,795
FY22$607,039
FY23$612,641

The city’s levies, FY27

What the city raises from each levy. The general levy is capped by state law; the others are set aside for one purpose.

  • Consolidate General Fund$1.7M55%
  • Debt Service Levy$659,92821%
  • Total Employee Benefit Levies$490,27115%
  • Liability, property & self insurance costs$294,1639%

Budget and spending

Reading a local budget

Where each dollar of Osceola’s budget goes, FY26

Business Type / Enterprise: 45¢ of every dollar45¢Capital Projects: 17¢ of every dollar17¢Debt Service: 13¢ of every dollar13¢Public Safety: 9¢ of every dollar9¢Culture and Recreation: 6¢ of every dollarEverything else: 10¢ of every dollar10¢

Planned spending from all funds, including city-run utilities like water and sewer (“business type”), which some cities run and others don’t. Transfers between funds are left out. “Cities this size” is the average for the 57 Iowa cities closest in size (3,700–8,300 people).

Where it goesOf each dollarCities this size (57)
Business Type / Enterprise45¢36¢
Capital Projects17¢20¢
Debt Service13¢7¢
Public Safety9¢13¢
Culture and Recreation6¢8¢
Everything else10¢16¢

Planned spending, FY27

All funds: property taxes, utility and other fees, state and federal money. “Business type” is city-run utilities and enterprises like water or sewer.

  • Capital Projects$11.9M59%
  • Public Safety$2.0M10%
  • Debt Service$1.7M9%
  • Public Works$1.7M8%
  • Culture and Recreation$1.6M8%
  • General Government$1.1M5%
  • Community and Economic Development$344,2002%

The state’s FY27 file doesn’t include business type / enterprise yet ($7.4M in FY26), so this total is low.

Budget compared with what it spent, FY23
FunctionBudgetSpent
Public Works$1.5M$1.9M
Public Safety$1.5M$1.7M
Health and Social Services$0$0
General Government$845,839$1.1M
Debt Service$2.2M$2.5M
Culture and Recreation$1.4M$971,890
Community and Economic Development$615,700$910,263
Capital Projects$30.6M$12.9M
Business Type / Enterprise$5.0M$8.4M

What it spent each year

FY24 left out8

$39.7M
$30.3M

Debt, reserves and audits

How local debt works · What an audit tells you

What Osceola owes

$42.2M at June 30, 2026: $7,802 per resident. 42nd most per resident of 939 Iowa places of its kind (the list).9

$46.3M
$42.2M
June 30OwedPer resident
2026$42.2M$7,802
2025$45.1M$8,320
2024$42.2M$7,784
2023$43.3M$7,990
2022$46.3M$8,542
2021$20.7M$3,825
2020$16.4M$3,029
2019$18.2M$3,355
2018$14.6M$2,695
2017$15.8M$2,921
2016$12.6M$2,326
2015$12.3M$2,280
2014$13.4M$2,477
2013$16.2M$2,992
2012$17.6M$3,245
2011$16.4M$3,036
2010$19.0M$3,514
Show the numbers
June 30OwedPer resident
2026$42.2M$7,802
2025$45.1M$8,320
2024$42.2M$7,784
2023$43.3M$7,990
2022$46.3M$8,542
2021$20.7M$3,825
2020$16.4M$3,029
2019$18.2M$3,355
2018$14.6M$2,695
2017$15.8M$2,921
2016$12.6M$2,326
2015$12.3M$2,280
2014$13.4M$2,477
2013$16.2M$2,992
2012$17.6M$3,245
2011$16.4M$3,036
2010$19.0M$3,514

Up 122% since 2010.

The 5% limit10

General obligation debt is $13.4M, 72% of the limit of about $18.6M (5% of $372.4M, the full value of its taxable property in 2024).

7 obligations at June 30, 2026
KindForPaid off byOwed
Revenue BondsNew Waste Water Treatment Plan, per DNR order2052$26.2M
General ObligationDemolition of 101/103 W Wash, housing, pool rehab, PD equipment, CIP, Comp PLan2044$6.7M
General Obligationrefinance of industrial park bond, new CIP money for E Street Paving, The Meadows, and Marina Parking, Downtown2035$4.2M
Revenue BondsRevenue Bond for Washington St, S Fillmore, and Force Main Sewer Projects and Old Plant combined two bonds in 20202033$2.7M
General ObligationIssued to fund land acquisition for new drinking water supply. Issued on an annual appropriation basis.2028$1.5M
General ObligationRefinance $500,000 Street Bond, $500,000 UR Bond, New money for demo fund, PD capital, landfill, snow plow2034$965,000
General ObligationRefi of casino rev bond into annual app bond for CCRC project PAID OFF EARLY2031$0

General obligation bonds are repaid from property taxes; revenue bonds and loans from the fees or revenue they’re tied to. On the Treasurer’s site

Money in reserve

The state’s budget files don’t include cities’ fund balances11. Osceola’s latest audit has them: Financial Statement, period ending Monday, June 30, 2025 (PDF).

Audits12

The latest: Financial Statement for the period ending Monday, June 30, 2025 (PDF), released Tuesday, March 31, 2026, by a CPA firm.

AI summary13

  • The auditors found that too few employees are handling financial tasks, meaning one person often manages multiple steps like handling cash, recording transactions, and reconciling bank accounts, which increases the risk of errors or theft.
  • Errors were found in how money was moved between funds, how certain payments were classified, and how receipts and disbursements were recorded, requiring significant adjustments to the financial statements.
  • The city does not deposit receipts daily, has not fully implemented a standard chart of accounts, and failed to perform complete reconciliations between bank accounts and the general ledger.
  • The city stated it will review its control procedures, attempt to implement new recording and deposit policies, and is working with an outside accounting firm to fix bank reconciliation issues.
The findings, as the report states them
Schedule of Findings Year Ended June 30, 2025 Part I: Findings Related to the Financial Statements: INTERNAL CONTROL DEFICIENCIES: 2025-001 Segregation of Duties Criteria — Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the City of Osceola's (City) financial statements. Condition — Generally, one or two individuals have control over each of the following areas for the City: 1) Cash — reconciling bank accounts, initiating cash receipts and handling and recording cash. 2) Investments — detailed record keeping, custody and reconciling. 3) Inventory — recording and reconciling. 4) Long-term debt — recording and reconciling. 5) Receipts — collecting, depositing, posting and reconciling. 6) Accounting system — performing all general accounting functions and having custody of City assets. 7) Disbursements — preparing checks, signing checks and access to the accounting records. 8) Petty cash — custody, reconciling and recording. 9) Payroll — recordkeeping, preparation and distribution. Cause — The City has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect — Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the City's ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation — The City should review its control activities to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff. Response — The City will review its control procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible with the limited staff it has. Conclusion — Response acknowledged. 2025-002 Preparation of Financial Statements Criteria - A properly designed system of internal control over financial reporting includes the preparation of an entity's financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements by internal personnel of the entity. -40- ### Page 41 City of Osceola Schedule of Findings Year Ended June 30, 2025 Condition - As auditors, we were requested to draft the financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements. It is the responsibility of management and those charged with governance to make the decision whether to accept the degree of risk associated with this condition because of cost or other considerations. Cause - We recognize that with a limited number of office employees, preparation of the financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements is difficult. Effect - The effect of this condition is that the year-end financial reporting is prepared by a party outside of the City. The outside party does not have the constant contact with ongoing financial transactions. Recommendation - We recommend that City officials continue reviewing operating procedures in order to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances to enable staff to draft the financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements internally. Response — These are very technical issues that the average citizen would not understand. This issue relates to auditor independence issues, and we accept the risk associated with not being able to prepare these documents and apply accounting principles in accordance with an other comprehensive basis of accounting. Conclusion — Response acknowledged. 2025-003 Material Adjustments Criteria — A deficiency in internal control over financial reporting exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements of the financial statements on a timely basis. Properly designed policies and procedures and implementation of the policies and procedures are an integral part of ensuring the reliability and accuracy of the City's financial statements. Condition — We noted that various interfund transfers were not properly recorded. Commercial/Industrial Replacement Claim Payments were not properly classified on the accounting system. Also, some receipts were credited to incorrect funds, and some disbursements were paid from incorrect funds. Cause — City policies do not require and procedures have not been established to provide for an independent review of receipts and disbursements to ensure the City's financial statements are accurate. Effect — Lack of City policies and procedures resulted in City employees not detecting the errors in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. As a result, material adjustments to the City's financial statements were necessary. Recommendation — The City should establish procedures to ensure all receipts and disbursements are properly recorded and reported in the City's financial statements. Response — The City will attempt to implement this recommendation. Conclusion — Response acknowledged. -41- ### Page 42 City of Osceola Schedule of Findings Year Ended June 30, 2025 2025-004 Receipts Criteria — A deficiency in internal control over financial reporting exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements of the financial statements on a timely basis. Properly designed policies and procedures and implementation of the policies and procedures are an integral part of ensuring the reliability and accuracy of the City's financial statement. Condition — Receipts are not deposited timely by the City. Currently, receipts are deposited to the bank within 2-3 days after receipt. Cause — City policies do not require and procedures have not been established to ensure all receipts are deposited timely. Effect — Lack of City policies and procedures resulted in City employees not depositing timely. Recommendation — The City should establish procedures to ensure all receipts are deposited timely, preferably on a daily basis. Response — We will attempt to implement this recommendation. Conclusion — Response acknowledged. 2025-005 Chart of Accounts Criteria — An effective internal control system provides for internal controls related to accurate and complete financial reporting. Condition — The City has not fully implemented the recommended Uniform Chart of Accounts for Iowa City Governments approved by the City Finance Committee. Cause — City policies and procedures have not been established to require the use of the Uniform Chart of Accounts. Effect — Not using a uniform chart account could result in inaccurate or incomplete financial reporting. Recommendation — To provide better financial information and control, the City should establish policies and procedures to require the use of the recommended Uniform Chart of Accounts, or its equivalent. Response — We will look at implementing a chart of accounts for the City. Conclusion — Response acknowledged. 2025-006 Bank Reconciliations Criteria — An effective internal control system provides for internal controls related to reconciling monthly financial reports to all bank accounts and investments. Condition — Although monthly bank reconciliations were prepared for individual bank accounts and investments, the reconciliations are not complied to show a complete reconciliation of all accounts with the general ledger. -42- ### Page 43 City of Osceola Schedule of Findings Year Ended June 30, 2025 Cause — Policies have not been established and procedures have not been implemented to prepare a complete bank reconciliation of all accounts and investments. Effect — Lack of performing and maintaining bank reconciliations could result in unrecorded transactions, undetected errors and opportunity for misappropriation. Recommendation — The City should establish procedures to ensure bank and investment account balances are reconciled to the general ledger monthly. Variances, if any, should be reviewed and resolved timely. Procedures should be established to ensure all financial reports reconcile and include all City activity. Response — Beginning with an effective date of June 30, 2025, this recommendation has been implemented. An outside accounting firm is assisting us with these reconciliations in fiscal year 2026. This should not be an issue in fiscal year 2026 and beyond. Conclusion — Response acknowledged. INSTANCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE: No matters were noted. -43- ### Page 44 City of Osceola Schedule of Findings Year Ended June 30, 2025 Part 11: Other Findings Related to Required Statutory Reporting: 2025-A Certified Budget — Disbursements during the year ended June 30, 2025 exceeded the amounts budgeted in the public works, community and economic development, general government and the business type activities functions. Chapter 384.20 of the Code of Iowa states, in part, "Public monies may not be expended or encumbered except under an annual or continuing appropriation." Recommendation — The budget should have been amended in accordance with Chapter 384.18 of the Code of Iowa before disbursements were allowed to exceed the budget. Response — The budget will be amended in the future, if applicable. Conclusion — Response acknowledged 2025-B Questionable Disbursements — No disbursements we believe may not meet the requirements of public purpose as defined in an Attorney General's opinion dated April 25, 1979 were noted. 2025-C Travel Expense — No disbursements of City of Osceola (City) money for travel expenses of spouses of City officials or employees were noted. 2025-D Business Transactions — No business transactions between the City and City officials or employees of the primary government were noted. 2025-E Restricted Donor Activity — No transactions were noted between the City, City officials, City employees and restricted donors in compliance with Chapter 68B of the Code of Iowa. 2025-F Bond Coverage — Surety bond coverage of City officials and employees is in accordance with statutory provisions. The amount of coverage should be reviewed annually to ensure the coverage is adequate for current operations. 2025-G Council Minutes — Transactions were found that we believe should have been approved in the Council minutes but were not. Some claims were not approved by the City Council. Several claims were not published in the newspaper. Chapter 372.13(6) of the Code of Iowa requires a summary of all receipts and the minutes of the proceedings of the Council be submitted to the newspaper for publication within fifteen days of the City Council meeting. In addition, this same Code Section requires that the City Council approve all claims and these claims be published in the newspaper. Recommendation - The City should implement procedures to ensure that all claims paid are approved by the City Council. The City should also implement procedures to ensure that all claims paid are included in the newspaper publications. Response - We will implement these recommendations. Conclusion - Response acknowledged. 2025-H Deposits and Investments — No instances of non-compliance with the deposit and investment provisions of Chapter 12B and 12C of the Code of Iowa and the City's investment policy were noted. -44- ### Page 45 City of Osceola Schedule of Findings Year Ended June 30, 2025 2025-I Sewer Revenue Bonds — The following instances of non-compliance with the sewer revenue bond resolutions were noted. • The sewer revenue bond resolutions require all users of the system, including the City, be charged for usage. The City is not currently charged for sewer usage. • The sewer revenue bond resolutions require the City to make sufficient monthly transfers to a separate sewer revenue bond sinking accourtt for the purpose of making the bond principal and interest payments when due. The City did not properly fund the sewer revenue bond sinking account each month as required. • The sewer revenue bond resolutions require the City to maintain and establish a sewer reserve fund with a balance of $436,900. While the City did properly establish this fund, this fund is not backed by cash since the cash balance in the Enterprise, Sewer Fund at June 30, 2025 is $93,386. Recommendation — The City should ensure all City departments pay for sewer usage and should make transfers in a timely manner and amount to the sewer revenue bond sinking account for the purpose of making the bond principal and interest payments when due. In addition, the City should ensure the balance in the sewer reserve fund is backed by cash. Response — We will review these recommendations and implement to the best of our ability. To address the lack of cash, we have additional monies available that the City can borrow, plus we will receive a donation in fiscal year 2026. These actions will help secure the financial issues in the Enterprise, Sewer Fund. Conclusion — Response acknowledged. 2025-J Legal Disbursements — The City paid $12,000 to its prior City Attorney in fiscal year 2025. The prior City Attorney does not provide invoices or detail to the City documenting the services provided by the this individual to the City. Recommendation — The City should ensure a written agreement is in place between the City and City Attorney, and adequate detail is provided to the City in relation to work performed by the City Attorney for the City. Response — The City has appointed a new City A
17 earlier reports for Osceola

State money

What the State of Iowa pays the city each year, and whether it has kept up with prices. Does state money keep pace? 14

What the state pays the city every year

Road Use Tax for streets, the commercial and industrial tax “backfill”, and ambulance reimbursement, paid every year by formula: $769,034 in FY25, up 21% since FY19 while prices rose 25%, so it buys 4% less. Grants are below.

Show the numbers
SourceFY22FY23FY24FY25
Road Use Tax (streets)$736,418$745,165$764,883$769,034

Grants and project money

State grants and money for specific projects (roads, development, natural resources) vary with what the city applies for and wins, so they aren’t counted as the state’s regular support.

$298,324
$3,537
  • State grants$3,537100%
YearGrants and projects
FY19$94,085
FY20$19,600
FY21$0
FY22$29,834
FY23$298,324
FY24$0
FY25$3,537
Show the numbers
YearGrants and projects
FY19$94,085
FY20$19,600
FY21$0
FY22$29,834
FY23$298,324
FY24$0
FY25$3,537

Has it kept up with prices?

Each source from FY19 to FY25, after inflation.

  • Road Use Tax (streets)−4%$636,756 → $769,034, up 21% since FY19 while prices rose 25%, so it buys 4% less

Collected by the state for the city

The local option sales tax is a city tax voters approved; the state collects it with the state sales tax and sends it back. It isn’t state aid. It’s up 48% since FY19 while prices rose 25%, so it buys 18% more.

$1.3M
$1.2M

Federal grants, for comparison: $324,460 in FY25.

Business awards

Every award statewide

State economic development awards

Community college new jobs training: 8 contracts since 1995 worth $2.7M, for 570 pledged jobs.

Awards statewide

Elections

Running for mayor and city council

Filing opens Monday, August 23, 2027: in 284 days.

For the Tuesday, November 2, 2027 election, candidates file Monday, August 23, 2027 to Thursday, September 16, 2027 with the county auditor (or the city clerk, if the auditor names the clerk to take them)15.

In a city that can hold a primary, filing runs Monday, August 9, 2027 to Thursday, August 26, 2027.

Most recent: November 4, 2025

City · 3

Local races from civicAPI and county auditors for Osceola; official results are on each county auditor’s site.

Who has filed for Tuesday, November 2, 2027

Filing hasn’t opened. These seats are expected on the ballot.

  • Osceola City Council At-Large
    Now held by George Fotiadis
  • Osceola City Council Ward 1
    Now held by Dan Hooper
  • Osceola City Council Ward 2
    Now held by Thomas Bahls
  • Osceola City Council Ward 3
    Now held by Sonya Hicks
  • Osceola Mayor
    Now held by Thomas Kedley

Candidates as county auditors and civicAPI list them; a filing can take a few days to appear here16.

Past ballot measures

  • Public Measure EKNovember 7, 2023

    Failed Yes 38.1% (255) · No 61.9% (415)

    Passes with more yes votes than no.

When a measure can be on the ballot

  • Tuesday, March 2, 2027 · no bond or debt questions
  • Tuesday, September 14, 2027 · no bond or debt questions
  • Tuesday, November 2, 2027 · any question, including bonds
  • Tuesday, March 7, 2028 · no bond or debt questions

Bonds and other borrowing can only go on the November ballot17.

Related places