Sign in

Bills › 88th General Assembly

SF 83Renumbered as SF 187 · February 5, 2019

Relating to the gross weight of special trucks, and providing fees

Topics:Transportation

Same legislation: HF 75, SF 187, HF 483, HF 769, SF 637

Write your legislators about it

Also covers HF 75 and SF 187 and HF 483 and HF 769 and SF 637.

Official bill pageLobbyist declarationsOne-pager to print

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 22, 2019
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 24, 2019
  3. Done: Senate committeeFebruary 5, 2019
  4. Done: Passes the SenateApril 26, 201949–0
  5. Skipped: House committeeSkipped
  6. Done: Passes the HouseApril 25, 2019
  7. Done: To the GovernorMay 2, 2019
  8. Done: Signed into lawMay 13, 2019

Became SF 187 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 187 What’s a funnel?

Senate subcommittee

Named January 24, 2019. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Fiscal note

Under Senate File 637, if 625 special trucks opted for the maximum tonnage and corresponding fees, the additional revenue would be $100,000 annually to the RUTF. If 1,000 trucks opted for the maximum tonnage, the RUTF would receive an additional $160,000.

Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

88th General Assembly

SF 83RenumberedSenate companionHF 75Didn’t advanceHouse companionSF 187Renumberedfrom SF 83HF 483Didn’t advanceHouse companionHF 769Became lawHouse companionSF 637Didn’t advancefrom SF 187

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.