Bills › 88th General Assembly

HF 75Withdrawn · HF 769 became law instead · April 25, 2019

Relating to the gross weight of special trucks, and providing fees

Topics:Transportation

Same legislation: SF 83, SF 187, HF 483, HF 769, SF 637

Write your legislators about it

Also covers SF 83 and SF 187 and HF 483 and HF 769 and SF 637.

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 22, 2019
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 5, 2019
  3. Done: House committeeFebruary 5, 2019
  4. Done: Passes the HouseApril 25, 2019
  5. Skipped: Senate committeeSkipped
  6. Done: Passes the SenateApril 26, 201949–0
  7. Done: To the GovernorMay 2, 2019
  8. Done: Signed into lawMay 13, 2019

HF 769 became law → The same legislation passed as HF 769, so this version was set aside. Go to HF 769 What’s a funnel?

House subcommittee

Named February 5, 2019. On February 18, 2019 it recommended passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Fiscal note

Under Senate File 637, if 625 special trucks opted for the maximum tonnage and corresponding fees, the additional revenue would be $100,000 annually to the RUTF. If 1,000 trucks opted for the maximum tonnage, the RUTF would receive an additional $160,000.

Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.