Sign in

Bills › 88th General Assembly

SF 637Withdrawn · HF 769 became law instead · April 26, 2019

Relating to the gross weight of special trucks, and providing fees

Same legislation: SF 83, HF 75, SF 187, HF 483, HF 769

Write your legislators about it

Also covers SF 83 and HF 75 and SF 187 and HF 483 and HF 769.

Official bill pageLobbyist declarationsOne-pager to print

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 22, 2019
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 24, 2019
  3. Done: Senate committeeFebruary 5, 2019
  4. Done: Passes the SenateApril 26, 201949–0
  5. Skipped: House committeeSkipped
  6. Done: Passes the HouseApril 25, 2019
  7. Done: To the GovernorMay 2, 2019
  8. Done: Signed into lawMay 13, 2019

HF 769 became law → The same legislation passed as HF 769, so this version was set aside. Go to HF 769 What’s a funnel?

Fiscal note

Cost: up to $160,000 Compare with other bills

Under Senate File 637, if 625 special trucks opted for the maximum tonnage and corresponding fees, the additional revenue would be $100,000 annually to the RUTF. If 1,000 trucks opted for the maximum tonnage, the RUTF would receive an additional $160,000.

Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

88th General Assembly

SF 83RenumberedSenate companionHF 75Didn’t advanceHouse companionSF 187Renumberedfrom SF 83HF 483Didn’t advanceHouse companionHF 769Became lawHouse companionSF 637Didn’t advancefrom SF 187

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.