Local taxes › Lee County › Fort Madison

City

Fort Madison

Lee County · How cities work

$3,640 a yearproperty tax on a $200,000 home here, FY27, for every local government ($43.27 per $1,000 of taxable value)1
$1,590 a yearof that goes to the city ($18.84 per $1,000)
$6.4Mproperty taxes the city levies, FY27
$22.1Mcity budget, FY27, without city-run utilities (not yet reported)2

Who runs it

The city council passes ordinances, adopts the budget and sets the city’s property tax.

  • Angela RollerFort Madison City Council Ward 2 · elected November 4, 2025
  • Jerry D. SparrowFort Madison City Council Ward 3 · elected November 4, 2025
  • Matthew EmmettFort Madison City Council At-Large · elected November 4, 2025
  • Melinda BlindFort Madison Mayor · elected November 4, 2025
  • Nicole MerschmanFort Madison City Council Ward 4 · elected November 4, 2025
  • Rusty AndrewsFort Madison City Council At-Large · elected November 4, 2025
  • Donna AmandusFort Madison City Council Ward 3 · elected November 7, 2023
  • Dustin YagerFort Madison City Council Ward 5 · elected November 7, 2023
  • Kevin RinkFort Madison City Council At-Large · elected November 7, 2023
  • Richard TheleFort Madison City Council Ward 1 · elected November 7, 2023

Officials are worked out from election results: every member whose four-year term is still running, plus appointments and titles Iowa Funnel has been told about. A resignation may not show yet.

Meetings and agendas

What the council is deciding: each agenda, the resolutions and ordinances on it, and a plain-language summary.

Iowa Funnel doesn’t read this city’s agendas yet. Every council and board posts its agenda at least 24 hours before it meets.

Property taxes

How the bill is collected · What each levy is for

Who gets a property owner’s tax bill in Fort Madison

Homes and businesses in most of Fort Madison pay a combined $43.27 per $1,000 of taxable value (FY27). They pay it all to the Lee County treasurer, who passes each government its share; the city sets and gets only its own piece, $18.84. Estimate your bill.

Rates over time

Per $1,000 of taxable value: the typical combined rate people in Fort Madison pay, and the city government’s own piece of it.

YearCombinedCity’s own
FY20$37.78$15.37
FY21$37.84$15.07
FY22$36.86$15.07
FY23$36.52$15.07
FY24$42.09$17.00
FY25$42.81$18.28
FY26$42.42$18.24
FY27$43.27$18.84
Show the numbers
YearCombinedCity’s own
FY20$37.78$15.37
FY21$37.84$15.07
FY22$36.86$15.07
FY23$36.52$15.07
FY24$42.09$17.00
FY25$42.81$18.28
FY26$42.42$18.24
FY27$43.27$18.84

Compared with places this size3

Fort Madison’s city property tax rate of $18.84 per $1,000 is the 2nd highest of 31 Iowa cities with 6,700–12,000 people. The middle of the group is $14.99.

Keokuk: $19.68Denison: $18.69Perry: $17.91Waverly: $17.53Atlantic: $17.48Knoxville: $17.46Fairfield: $16.69Webster City: $16.51Charles City: $15.95Grinnell: $15.60Decorah: $15.52Washington: $15.21Storm Lake: $15.17Boone: $15.13Creston: $14.99Nevada: $14.58Oskaloosa: $14.47Spencer: $13.84Hiawatha: $13.78Adel: $13.43Pleasant Hill: $12.10Mount Pleasant: $11.94Tiffin: $11.80Carroll: $11.25Le Mars: $11.18Sioux Center: $11.05Bondurant: $10.82Pella: $10.75Clear Lake: $9.85Eldridge: $8.13Fort Madison: $18.84$8.13 lowest$19.68 highestmiddle
See all 31
#PlaceRate per $1,000People
1Keokuk$19.689,462
2Fort Madison$18.849,983
3Denison$18.698,302
4Perry$17.918,046
5Waverly$17.5310,576
6Atlantic$17.486,717
7Knoxville$17.467,440
8Fairfield$16.699,511
9Webster City$16.517,763
10Charles City$15.957,081
11Grinnell$15.609,495
12Decorah$15.527,454
13Washington$15.217,281
14Storm Lake$15.1711,627
15Boone$15.1312,461
16Creston$14.997,421
17Nevada$14.587,082
18Oskaloosa$14.4711,575
19Spencer$13.8411,418
20Hiawatha$13.787,347
21Adel$13.436,763
22Pleasant Hill$12.1011,942
23Mount Pleasant$11.948,509
24Tiffin$11.806,695
25Carroll$11.2510,125
26Le Mars$11.1810,674
27Sioux Center$11.058,675
28Bondurant$10.829,511
29Pella$10.7510,965
30Clear Lake$9.857,602
31Eldridge$8.136,967

The $8.10 limit

Fort Madison’s general levy is $7.97 per $1,000 of taxable value in FY27, $0.13 below the limit.4 465 of 934 Iowa cities have a higher general levy. All cities.

FY23 $8.10 · FY24 $8.10 · FY25 $8.21 · FY26 $8.21 · FY27 $7.97 (before FY25, the general levy alone)

Outside the limit: $10.87 more5

  • Total Employee Benefit Levies$5.59 · $1.9M
  • Debt Service Levy$4.91 · $1.7M
  • Liability, property & self insurance costs$0.38 · $127,093

Tax increment financing (TIF)

Fort Madison’s TIF revenue, from its reports to the state. It budgeted $167,630 in TIF revenue for FY25.

$1.0M
$233,470
YearTIF revenue
FY16$423,262
FY17$549,052
FY18$1.0M
FY19$186,381
FY20$249,998
FY21$264,862
FY22$274,624
FY23$233,470
Show the numbers
YearTIF revenue
FY16$423,262
FY17$549,052
FY18$1.0M
FY19$186,381
FY20$249,998
FY21$264,862
FY22$274,624
FY23$233,470

The city’s levies, FY27

What the city raises from each levy. The general levy is capped by state law; the others are set aside for one purpose.

  • Consolidate General Fund$2.7M42%
  • Total Employee Benefit Levies$1.9M30%
  • Debt Service Levy$1.7M26%
  • Liability, property & self insurance costs$127,0932%

Budget and spending

Reading a local budget

Where each dollar of Fort Madison’s budget goes, FY26

Business Type / Enterprise: 37¢ of every dollar37¢Public Safety: 21¢ of every dollar21¢Capital Projects: 13¢ of every dollar13¢General Government: 11¢ of every dollar11¢Public Works: 7¢ of every dollarEverything else: 11¢ of every dollar11¢

Planned spending from all funds, including city-run utilities like water and sewer (“business type”), which some cities run and others don’t. Transfers between funds are left out. “Cities this size” is the average for the 30 Iowa cities closest in size (6,700–12,000 people).

Where it goesOf each dollarCities this size (30)
Business Type / Enterprise37¢34¢
Public Safety21¢13¢
Capital Projects13¢23¢
General Government11¢5¢
Public Works7¢8¢
Everything else11¢17¢

Planned spending, FY27

All funds: property taxes, utility and other fees, state and federal money. “Business type” is city-run utilities and enterprises like water or sewer.

  • Capital Projects$8.8M40%
  • Public Safety$5.4M24%
  • General Government$3.0M14%
  • Debt Service$1.7M8%
  • Public Works$1.6M7%
  • Culture and Recreation$1.3M6%
  • Community and Economic Development$317,0201%

The state’s FY27 file doesn’t include business type / enterprise yet ($9.3M in FY26), so this total is low.

Budget compared with what it spent, FY23
FunctionBudgetSpent
Public Works$1.7M$1.5M
Public Safety$4.7M$4.6M
Health and Social Services$0$0
General Government$2.4M$3.0M
Debt Service$688,810$997,264
Culture and Recreation$2.2M$1.9M
Community and Economic Development$480,810$626,047
Capital Projects$9.1M$10.3M
Business Type / Enterprise$8.1M$7.8M

What it spent each year

FY24 left out6

$34.0M
$30.8M

Fort Madison’s own budget documents

The adopted budgets, resolutions and hearing notices the city posts, often weeks before the state publishes the figures. The city’s finance page

Debt, reserves and audits

How local debt works · What an audit tells you

What Fort Madison owes

$51.2M at June 30, 2026: $4,985 per resident. 131st most per resident of 939 Iowa places of its kind (the list).7

$51.2M
June 30OwedPer resident
2026$51.2M$4,985
2025$43.3M$4,215
2024$45.6M$4,437
2023$47.6M$4,636
2022$41.6M$4,048
2021$43.0M$4,184
2020$44.0M$4,285
2019$45.6M$4,438
2018$47.0M$4,578
2017$38.5M$3,749
2016$29.3M$2,848
2015$27.6M$2,683
2014$27.0M$2,631
2013$23.1M$2,244
2012$23.5M$2,293
2011$24.4M$2,380
2010$21.7M$2,112
Show the numbers
June 30OwedPer resident
2026$51.2M$4,985
2025$43.3M$4,215
2024$45.6M$4,437
2023$47.6M$4,636
2022$41.6M$4,048
2021$43.0M$4,184
2020$44.0M$4,285
2019$45.6M$4,438
2018$47.0M$4,578
2017$38.5M$3,749
2016$29.3M$2,848
2015$27.6M$2,683
2014$27.0M$2,631
2013$23.1M$2,244
2012$23.5M$2,293
2011$24.4M$2,380
2010$21.7M$2,112

Up 136% since 2010.

The 5% limit8

General obligation debt is $20.3M, 73% of the limit of about $27.8M (5% of $556.4M, the full value of its taxable property in 2024).

16 obligations at June 30, 2026
KindForPaid off byOwed
Revenue BondsREHAB WWTP2047$14.9M
General ObligationFire Station 7.2M, PW Bldg 950k, Refi 2013 GO Bond2046$10.3M
General ObligationROAD CONSTRUCTION2042$7.5M
Revenue BondsWATER TREATMENT PLANT2047$6.3M
Revenue BondsSW INDUSTRIAL SEWER2045$2.5M
General ObligationQUALITY OF LIFE - STREETS; PARKS VARIOUS PROJECTS2033$2.5M
Revenue BondsWATER PROJECT2041$1.5M
Revenue BondsSEWER2035$1.4M
Revenue BondsWATER PROJECT2041$1.3M
Revenue BondsREHAB WATER RESERVOIR2038$1.1M
Revenue BondsWWTP REHAB2035$988,000
Revenue BondsWATER PROJECT2030$245,000
Revenue BondsWATER PROJ2040$221,000
Revenue BondsWATER PROJ2027$193,000
Revenue BondsTIF - APT COMPLEX2031$105,000
LoansEcon Dev-Bldg Rehab2035$90,442

General obligation bonds are repaid from property taxes; revenue bonds and loans from the fees or revenue they’re tied to. On the Treasurer’s site

Money in reserve

The state’s budget files don’t include cities’ fund balances9. Fort Madison’s latest audit has them: Financial Statement, period ending Tuesday, June 30, 2026 (PDF).

Audits10

The latest: Financial Statement for the period ending Tuesday, June 30, 2026 (PDF), released Monday, October 19, 2026, by a CPA firm.

AI summary11

  • One employee has too much control over financial tasks, such as handling cash, making bank deposits, recording transactions, and printing checks.
  • The city spent more money on debt service than was allowed in the budget.
  • The city's Annual Urban Renewal Report contained incorrect cash balances and negative obligation amounts.
  • Two funds had deficit balances: the Economic Development fund was short $180,007 and the Airport fund was short $88,712.
  • The city will review operating procedures to better separate duties, amend budgets before overspending, ensure report accuracy, and expects to resolve fund deficits through upcoming reimbursements.
The findings, as the report states them
Schedule of Findings and Responses # SECTION I – BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS 2026-001 LACK OF SEGREGATION OF ACCOUNTING DUTIES Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the City's financial statements. Condition: Generally, one or two individuals identified may have control over the following areas for which no compensating controls exist. One individual in the City has control over the cash receipts listing, bank deposits and the posting of cash receipts to the cash receipts journal. This same individual also reviews payroll and prints disbursement checks which are electronically signed when printed. This same individual is able to enter invoices and print checks. This same individual also is able to post journal entries without review and utility billing adjustments are not reviewed. Cause: The City has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect or Potential Effect: Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the City's ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation: We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the City should review its operating procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances. The City should utilize current personnel, including elected officials, to provide additional control through review of financial transactions, reconciliations and reports. Such reviews should be performed by independent persons and should be documented by the signature or initials of the reviewer and the date of the review. Response: The City will continue to review operating procedures and segregate employee duties to the extent financially feasible to maximize internal control. Conclusion: Response accepted. ### Page 68 City of Fort Madison Schedule of Findings and Responses SECTION II: FINDINGS RELATED TO STATUTORY REPORTING II-A-26 - Certified Budget Disbursements for the year ended June 30, 2026, did exceed budgeted amounts in the debt service function. Recommendation: The City should ensure the budget is amended prior to exceeding budgeted expenditures. Responses: The City will ensure budget amendments are done in the future. Conclusion: Response accepted. II-B-26 - Questionable Disbursements We noted no disbursements for parties, banquets or other entertainment for employees that we believe may constitute an unlawful expenditure from funds as defined in an Attorney General's opinion dated April 25, 1979. II-C-26 - Travel Expense No disbursements of City money for travel expenses of spouses of City officials or employees were noted. II-D-26 - Business Transactions Business transactions between the City and City officials or employees are detailed as follows: In accordance with Chapter 362.5(3)(j) of the Code of Iowa, the transactions with the Firefighter do not appear to represent conflicts of interest even though the amount paid exceeded $6,000 during the fiscal year due to the purchases being competitively quoted and the lowest quote being chosen. II-E-26 - Restricted Donor Activity No Transactions were noted between the City, City officials, City employees and restricted donors in compliance with Chapter 68B of the Code of Iowa. II-F-26 - Bond Coverage Surety bond coverage of City officials and employees is in accordance with statutory provisions. The amount of coverage should be reviewed annually to ensure that the coverage is adequate for current operations. II-G-26 - Council Minutes No transactions were found that we believe should have been approved in the Council minutes but were not. ### Page 69 City of Fort Madison Schedule of Findings and Responses SECTION II: FINDINGS RELATED TO STATUTORY REPORTING (CONTINUED) II-H-26 - Deposits and Investments No instances of noncompliance with the deposit and investment provision of Chapter 12B and 12C of the Code of Iowa and the City's investment policy were noted. II-I-26 - Revenue Bonds and Notes No instances of non-compliance with the revenue bond and note resolutions were noted. II-J-26 - Tax Increment Financing The Special Revenue, Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Fund properly disbursed payments for TIF loans and rebates. Also, the City of Fort Madison properly completed the Tax Increment Debt Certificate Forms to request TIF property taxes. II-K-26 - Annual Urban Renewal Report The Annual Urban Renewal Report was properly approved and certified to the Iowa Department of Management on or before December 1, as required. However, the cash balance on the Levy Authority Summary page does not match City records and the total outstanding TIF Obligations on the Annual Urban Renewal Report were negative. Recommendation: The City should ensure the amounts reported on the Annual Urban Renewal Report are supported and agree with City records. Response: The City will ensure that the cash balances and outstanding TIF obligations are correct in future reports. Conclusion: Response accepted. II-L-26 - Financial Condition At June 30, 2026, the following funds had deficit balances: - • Special Revenue, Economic Development $ 180,007 - • Enterprise, Airport 88,712 Recommendation: The City should investigate alternatives to eliminate this deficit and return these funds to a sound financial condition. Response: The deficit in Special Revenue, Economic Development is for funds that have been used for abandoned properties that the City will receive revenues to cover the expenses. The deficit also includes expenses for projects that will be reimbursed in fiscal 2027. The deficit in Enterprise Airport is for unreimbursed grant funds that will be received in fiscal 2027. Conclusion: Response accepted.
17 earlier reports for Fort Madison

State money

What the State of Iowa pays the city each year, and whether it has kept up with prices. Does state money keep pace? 12

What the state pays the city every year

Road Use Tax for streets, the commercial and industrial tax “backfill”, and ambulance reimbursement, paid every year by formula: $1.8M in FY25, up 12% since FY19 while prices rose 25%, so it buys 11% less. Grants are below.

Show the numbers
SourceFY22FY23FY24FY25
Road Use Tax (streets)$1.4M$1.4M$1.5M$1.5M
Commercial and industrial tax replacement (“backfill”)$149,398$131,717$320,495$324,803

Grants and project money

State grants and money for specific projects (roads, development, natural resources) vary with what the city applies for and wins, so they aren’t counted as the state’s regular support.

$2.3M
$61,396
  • State grants$61,396100%
YearGrants and projects
FY19$1.2M
FY20$643,867
FY21$2.3M
FY22$151,565
FY23$2.3M
FY24$919,857
FY25$61,396
Show the numbers
YearGrants and projects
FY19$1.2M
FY20$643,867
FY21$2.3M
FY22$151,565
FY23$2.3M
FY24$919,857
FY25$61,396

Has it kept up with prices?

Each source from FY19 to FY25, after inflation.

  • Road Use Tax (streets)−18%$1.4M → $1.5M, up 3% since FY19 while prices rose 25%, so it buys 18% less
  • Commercial and industrial tax replacement (“backfill”)+51%$171,106 → $324,803, up 90% since FY19 while prices rose 25%, so it buys 51% more

Collected by the state for the city

The local option sales tax is a city tax voters approved; the state collects it with the state sales tax and sends it back. It isn’t state aid. It’s up 27% since FY19 while prices rose 25%, so it buys 1% more.

$1.9M
$1.5M

Federal grants, for comparison: $1.4M in FY25.

Business awards

Every award statewide

State economic development awards

3 businesses have state awards in FORT MADISON: $1.7M in grants, loans and tax benefits, for 145 jobs. Closed projects promised 132 jobs; 132 were there at the end.13

  • ConAgra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC
    High Quality Jobs Program · FY20 · Closed: Met its contract · 91 jobs required, 91 at the end
    $1.3M
  • Scott's Miracle-Gro Company, Inc.
    High Quality Jobs Program · FY18 · Closed: Met its contract · 41 jobs required, 41 at the end
    $192K
  • Gregory Manufacturing Company
    Targeted Jobs · FY16 · Under contract: Keeping the jobs · 13 jobs required, 13 reported
    $222K

Community college new jobs training: 8 contracts since 1997 worth $7.2M, for 815 pledged jobs.

Awards statewide

Elections

Running for mayor and city council

Filing opens Monday, August 23, 2027: in 284 days.

For the Tuesday, November 2, 2027 election, candidates file Monday, August 23, 2027 to Thursday, September 16, 2027 with the county auditor (or the city clerk, if the auditor names the clerk to take them)14.

In a city that can hold a primary, filing runs Monday, August 9, 2027 to Thursday, August 26, 2027.

Local races from civicAPI and county auditors for Fort Madison; official results are on each county auditor’s site.

Who has filed for Tuesday, November 2, 2027

Filing hasn’t opened. These seats are expected on the ballot.

  • Fort Madison City Council At-Large
    Now held by Kevin Rink
  • Fort Madison City Council Ward 1
    Now held by Richard Thele
  • Fort Madison City Council Ward 3
    Now held by Donna Amandus
  • Fort Madison City Council Ward 5
    Now held by Dustin Yager
  • Fort Madison Mayor
    Now held by Melinda Blind

Candidates as county auditors and civicAPI list them; a filing can take a few days to appear here15.

Past ballot measures

None found since 2022.

When a measure can be on the ballot

  • Tuesday, March 2, 2027 · no bond or debt questions
  • Tuesday, September 14, 2027 · no bond or debt questions
  • Tuesday, November 2, 2027 · any question, including bonds
  • Tuesday, March 7, 2028 · no bond or debt questions

Bonds and other borrowing can only go on the November ballot16.

Related places