Bills › 91st General Assembly

SSB 1201Died when the session ended · March 4, 2025

Relating to magistrate judges, and including effective date provisions

Proposed by the Judicial Branch · their explanation · all agency proposals

Topics:Courts & civil law

Same legislation: HSB 260

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedMarch 4, 2025
  2. Done: SubcommitteeMarch 4, 2025
  3. Stopped: Senate committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
  4. Next: Passes the Senate
  5. Next: House committeeFunnel: by March 20, 2026
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The General Assembly adjourned on October 2, 2026. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill relates to magistrate judges. _____ counties. Under the bill, the substitution must not result in a lack of at least one district associate judge or magistrate appointed to serve each county. A district associate judge is allowed to be appointed to serve in more than one county. In addition, the bill allows a magistrate to be appointed to serve in more than one county. If a magistrate is appointed in more than one county, the appointment shall be made jointly from persons nominated by the county magistrate appointing commission of each county, with each commission following the procedures set forth under current law.

Read the full explanation

The bill strikes a prohibition on appointing more magistrates than are authorized for a county. The bill requires the supreme court to prescribe a new formula for apportioning magistrates based on an estimated case-related workload and to create the application to become a magistrate. Under current law, the magistrate appointing commission for each county creates the application in addition to any form provided by the supreme court. These magistrate provisions take effect January 1, 2029. Until January 1, 2029, if a magistrate vacancy occurs, the bill allows the chief judge of a judicial district to assign a magistrate to a county in the same judicial election district to the vacant magistrate position if the position cannot be filled by normal appointment and if the combined weighted workload of the two counties does not exceed percent of a full-time position. Under current law, a magistrate is required to be a resident of the county of appointment or a resident in a county contiguous to the county of appointment. Under the bill, a magistrate is instead required to be a resident of the judicial election district or a county contiguous to the judicial election district.

From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text

Senate subcommittee

Named March 4, 2025. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§602.6302§602.6401§602.6403§602.6404

Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works

Lobbying

1 for · 3 against · 6 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

91st General Assembly

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.