Bills › 90th General Assembly

SF 2195Withdrawn · HF 2618 became law instead · April 17, 2024

Relating to reading instruction, including modifying provisions related to the language arts instruction provided to students enrolled in kindergarten through grade three and the preparation in reading theory provided by practitioner preparation programs, and including applicability provisions

Sponsored by the Senate Education Committee

Topics:K–12 education

Same legislation: HF 2618

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 1, 2024
  2. Skipped: SubcommitteeSkipped
  3. Done: Senate committeeFebruary 1, 2024
  4. Done: Passes the SenateApril 17, 202446–0
  5. Skipped: House committeeSkipped
  6. Done: Passes the HouseApril 2, 202492–3
  7. Done: To the GovernorApril 24, 2024
  8. Done: Signed into lawMay 7, 2024

HF 2618 became law → The same legislation passed as HF 2618, so this version was set aside. Go to HF 2618 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill relates to reading instruction, including modifying provisions related to the language arts instruction provided to students enrolled in kindergarten through grade three and the preparation in reading theory provided by practitioner preparation programs. The bill requires the kindergarten program to include experiences designed to develop growth in skills related to encoding and decoding words. The bill modifies provisions related to the language arts instruction provided to students enrolled in kindergarten through grade three in school districts, accredited nonpublic schools, and charter schools.

Read the full explanation

The bill provides that, commencing with the school year beginning July 1, 2026, such instruction shall include evidence-based early reading instruction that follows a scope and sequence and that is direct, systematic, explicit, responsive, and that consists of phonemic and phonological awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. Additionally, the bill prohibits such instruction from incorporating any strategies or approaches that are designed to teach students to read words based on meaning drawn from context, structure and syntax, visual cues and pictures, or rote memorization, including the instruction model commonly known as the three-cueing system. The bill modifies provisions related to preparation in reading theory, knowledge, strategies, and approaches provided in practitioner preparation programs. The bill requires that such preparation include evidence-based early reading instruction and practical application that follow a scope and sequence that are direct, systematic, explicit, responsive, and that also consist of phonemic and phonological awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. The bill prohibits such preparation from including instruction or practical application that is designed to teach students to encode and decode words based on meaning drawn from context, structure and syntax, visual cues and pictures, or rote memorization, including the instruction model commonly known as the three-cueing system. The bill provides that these provisions apply to students admitted to an approved practitioner preparation program on or after July 1, 2025. The bill defines “evidence-based” to mean instruction based on studies that use rigorous methods to control common threats to internal and external validity, measures found to be reliable and valid indicators of literacy, and research findings or positive evaluation that such activity, strategy, or intervention is likely to improve student outcomes or other relevant outcomes and includes ongoing efforts to examine the effects of such activity, strategy, or intervention.

From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text · What changed before it passed

Fiscal note

Cost: up to $430,000 Compare with other bills

The fiscal impact to the State is estimated to be $430,000 in FY 2025. 0 new FTE positions and a $30,000 one-time cost to Iowa State University for redeveloping three of its courses. There may be a one-time fiscal impact to individual school districts.

Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§256.11§256.16§256E.7

Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works

Lobbying

5 for · 0 against · 12 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.