Bills › 90th General Assembly
Relating to elementary literacy by modifying teacher preparation program requirements, requiring personalized reading plans for certain students, and providing parent and guardian discretion for their students to be retained at grade level
Sponsored by the House Education Committee
Topics:K–12 education
Same legislation: SF 2195
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 1, 2024
- Skipped: SubcommitteeSkipped
- Done: House committeeMarch 14, 2024
- Done: Passes the HouseApril 2, 202492–3
- Skipped: Senate committeeSkipped
- Done: Passes the SenateApril 17, 202446–0
- Done: To the GovernorApril 24, 2024
- Done: Signed into lawMay 7, 2024
Signed into law What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
This bill relates to elementary literacy by modifying teacher preparation program requirements, requiring personalized reading plans for certain students, and providing parent and guardian discretion for their students to be retained at grade level. The bill requires higher education institutions providing practitioner preparation programs to administer, prior to a student’s completion of the program, an examination identical to the foundations of reading assessment administered in 2012 as part of the Massachusetts tests for educator licensure, or the most current version of such assessment.
Read the full explanation
The bill establishes that, to successfully complete the program, a student must attain a score on the assessment that is at or above the minimum passing score established by the department. In establishing the minimum passing score, the bill requires the department to consider the minimum passing score recommended by the developer of the assessment and the current teaching standards in this state. The bill requires higher education institutions to report to the department annually the scores students receive on the assessment and any services or opportunities the institution makes available to students who fail the assessment. Additionally, the bill requires the department to compile these reports and publish on the department’s internet site the compiled reports related to students enrolled in the program who plan to teach in kindergarten through grade six. The bill requires a school district to provide written notice to the parent or guardian of any student in grade three who is not reading proficiently of the student’s level of reading or reading readiness. The bill provides that the written notice shall indicate that if the parent or guardian submits a request that the student be retained in grade three, the school district shall not promote the student to grade four but shall retain the student at grade three for the subsequent school year. However, the bill establishes that, if during the student’s grade three year, the administrator and the student’s classroom teacher provide evidence to the student’s parent or guardian that the student has made adequate progress and is reading at grade level, the student’s parent or guardian may withdraw the request and the school district may promote the student to grade four. The bill requires a school district to provide to students who are not reading proficiently at the start of the student’s grade three school year with a personalized reading plan. The bill provides that the school district shall continue to provide such plans to students in grade three through the end of grade six if necessary.3.2, subsection 3, which would relieve a political subdivision from complying with a state mandate if funding for the cost of the state mandate is not provided or specified. Therefore, political subdivisions are required to comply with any state mandate included in the bill.
From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text · What changed before it passed
Fiscal note
The fiscal impact to the State is estimated to be $430,000 in FY 2025. 0 new FTE positions and a $30,000 one-time cost to Iowa State University for redeveloping three of its courses. There may be a one-time fiscal impact to individual school districts.
Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note
Iowa Code it changes
Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works
Lobbying
5 for · 0 against · 12 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.
90th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.