Proyectos de ley › 88.ª Asamblea General
Requiring that a primary runoff election be held in the event of an inconclusive primary election for certain offices, and including effective date and applicability provisions
Presentado por el comité State Government del Senado
Temas:Elections & voting
La misma legislación: SF 36
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado15 de enero de 2019
- Hecho: Subcomité22 de enero de 2019
- Hecho: Comité del Senado28 de febrero de 2019
- Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado28 de marzo de 201946–0
- Se detuvo: Comité de la CámaraMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2020 terminó el 14 de junio de 2020, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
La explicación oficial está en inglés; todavía no hay resumen en palabras sencillas.
This bill requires a primary runoff election be held to determine a party’s nominee in the case of an inconclusive primary election for certain offices. Under current law, an inconclusive primary occurs when there is not a sufficient number of candidates who received at least percent of the vote in the primary election to fill the necessary number of nominations for an office. Current law provides that nominations following an inconclusive primary be filled by the party’s state convention, congressional district convention, party precinct committee members, county convention delegates, or county convention precinct delegates, as applicable.
Lea la explicación completa
Primary runoff elections are to be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in August following the primary election and are to be conducted and the results canvassed in the same manner as primary elections. Relating to primary runoff elections for county offices, the bill provides that when one nominee is required, the two candidates who received the highest number of votes cast for the nomination shall be the candidates in the primary runoff election. When two or more nominees are required and the necessary number of nominations were not made at the primary election, the number of candidates in the primary runoff election shall equal one more than the remaining necessary number of nominations, and the candidates shall be the remaining candidates who received the highest number of votes cast in the primary election but who did not receive at least percent of the vote cast to be nominated in the primary election. The candidate or candidates who receive the highest number of votes cast by voters of the nominating party in the primary runoff election shall be the nominee or nominees of that party for that office in the general election. Relating to primary runoff elections for statewide office, congressional office, and members of the general assembly, the bill provides that the two candidates who received the highest number of votes cast in the primary election shall be the candidates in the primary runoff election. The candidate in the primary runoff election who receives the highest number of votes cast by voters of the nominating party shall be the nominee of that party for that office in the general election. The bill requires that if a person receives enough write-in votes at an inconclusive primary election to be placed on a primary runoff election ballot, the county commissioner of elections or the state commissioner of elections, as appropriate, shall immediately after the canvass of the primary election notify the person that the person is required to file an affidavit of candidacy if the person wishes to be a candidate for nomination to that office at the primary runoff election.3.2, subsection 3, which would relieve a political subdivision from complying with a state mandate if funding for the cost of the state mandate is not provided or specified. Therefore, political subdivisions are required to comply with any state mandate included in the bill.
Nota fiscal
Cost: up to $35,000 Compare con otros proyectos
Resumen con IA Senate File 410 requires a primary runoff election to be held if no candidate receives at least 35.0% of the vote to fill necessary nominations. All costs for these elections would be paid at the county level, with expenses ranging from approximately $10,000 for a local county board of supervisors seat to an approximate average of $849,800 for each of the four congressional districts and up to $3.4 million for a statewide runoff election. If a statewide runoff occurs, the Secretary of State’s Office will incur approximately $35,000 in additional computer programming costs and staff overtime expenses. (en inglés)2
Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)
Description
Senate File 410 requires that a primary runoff election be held to determine a party’s nominee in in the event of an inconclusive primary election. An inconclusive primary election occurs when there is not a sufficient number of candidates from one political party who received at least 35.0% of the vote in a primary election to fill the necessary number of nominations for an office. This includes elections for county offices, statewide offices, congressional offices, and members of the General Assembly.
Background
- Under current law, the winner of an inconclusive primary election is determined by applicable delegates at convention, and expenses are paid by the applicable political party.
- In Iowa, one congressional district seat in the 2002 election and in the 2014 election was determined by convention.
- The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) reports that 10 states have provisions for primary runoff elections: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, and Vermont. Vermont only holds runoffs in the event of a tie, and South Dakota only holds runoffs for the offices of U.S. Senator, U.S. Representative, and Governor.
Assumptions
- Each county auditor will determine how to staff, equip, and supply the election site with precinct officials and the appropriate quantity of ballots.
- Based on responses from 56 counties, the average cost of a special election per capita is $1.18. The highest cost is $4.21, the lowest cost is $0.33, and the median cost is $1.07. It is assumed these numbers would hold statewide, but $1.10 will be used for the calculations below.
- Precinct workers’ pay varies from county to county but averages approximately $8.50 per hour, plus travel reimbursement, training, and supplies. Travel costs in rural precincts will be higher than in precincts in cities. Each precinct has approximately five workers working a 16-hour day.
- The cost per ballot is $0.25, and the cost for postage and envelopes per absentee ballot is $1.68.
- County election administration costs are estimated to be $30 per hour per person, including base pay, overtime pay, and benefits.
- Publication costs per county are $2,000.
- The voting equipment programming cost per county is $3,000.
- The calculations assume a 25.0% voter turnout.
- The average cost per precinct for officials, equipment, and supplies is approximately $1,470.
- Some county supervisors are elected “at large” by the entire county, while others are elected by a specific district within the county. The smallest district is assumed to include seven precincts.
- Primary runoff elections happen infrequently but are assumed to happen more frequently at the county level than at the state or congressional level.
Fiscal Impact
All costs for a primary runoff election would be paid at the county level. The effect on county expenditures would depend on the number of precincts involved. Cost estimates range from approximately $10,000 for seven precincts in a county local election for a specific county board of supervisors seat; to an approximate average of $849,800 for each of the four congressional districts; and up to $3.4 million for a statewide runoff election.
In the event of a statewide primary runoff, the Secretary of State’s Office will incur approximately $35,000 in additional computer programming costs and staff overtime expenses.
Sources
- Iowa State Association of Counties (ISAC)
- Secretary of State’s Office
- National Conference of State Legislatures
- Elections, Primary Runoff · 5 de marzo de 2019 · $35,000
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
1 a favor · 3 en contra · 6 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
88th General Assembly