Requiring that a primary runoff election be held in the event of an inconclusive primary election for certain offices, and including effective date and applicability provisions

Where it is now

1. ✓
   Done: IntroducedJanuary 15, 2019
2. ✓
   Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 22, 2019
3. ✓
   Done: Senate committeeFebruary 28, 2019
4. ✓
   Done: Passes the SenateMarch 28, 201946–0
5. Next: House committee
6. Next: Passes the House
7. Next: To the Governor
8. Next: Signed into law

Became SF 410 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 410 What’s a funnel?

Senate subcommittee

Named January 22, 2019. On February 14, 2019 it recommended passage.

• Sen. Brad Zaun R
• Sen. Tony Bisignano DEmail
• Sen. R. Smith

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Fiscal note

All costs for a primary runoff election would be paid at the county level. The effect on county expenditures would depend on the number of precincts involved. 4 million for a statewide runoff election. In the event of a statewide primary runoff, the Secretary of State’s Office will incur approximately $35,000 in additional computer programming costs and staff overtime expenses.

• Elections, Primary Runoff · March 5, 2019

Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.