Bills › 88th General Assembly

SF 410Died when the session ended · March 28, 2019

Requiring that a primary runoff election be held in the event of an inconclusive primary election for certain offices, and including effective date and applicability provisions

Topics:State government

Same legislation: SF 36

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 15, 2019
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 22, 2019
  3. Done: Senate committeeFebruary 28, 2019
  4. Done: Passes the SenateMarch 28, 201946–0
  5. Stopped: House committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The General Assembly adjourned on June 14, 2020. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

Fiscal note

Cost: up to $35,000 Compare with other bills

All costs for a primary runoff election would be paid at the county level. The effect on county expenditures would depend on the number of precincts involved. 4 million for a statewide runoff election. In the event of a statewide primary runoff, the Secretary of State’s Office will incur approximately $35,000 in additional computer programming costs and staff overtime expenses.

Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.