Bills › 88th General Assembly
Relating to the assessment of an agricultural crime surcharge on criminal offenses involving crops, livestock, or honeybees, and making an appropriation
Topics:AgricultureState budgetCrime & correctionsLivestock & confinements
Same legislation: HF 553
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 28, 2019
- Done: SubcommitteeMarch 5, 2019
- Done: House committeeMarch 13, 2019
- Done: Passes the HouseApril 24, 2019
- Stopped: Senate committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The General Assembly adjourned on June 14, 2020. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
Senate subcommittee
Named April 25, 2019. On January 22, 2020 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Fiscal note
Can’t be estimated Compare with other bills
The fiscal impact of HF 742 cannot be estimated because the current criminal code does not differentiate between theft and agricultural theft. The Agricultural Crime Surcharge would be applied in addition to the fine and surcharge imposed for a Class C or Class D felony or an aggravated misdemeanor. 7%. 6% of the amount assessed from the Agricultural Crime Surcharge.
- Livestock and Crop Theft · March 19, 2019
Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note
Family tree
Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.
88th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.