Sign in

Bills › 88th General Assembly

HF 553Withdrawn · April 24, 2019

Relating to the assessment of an agricultural theft surcharge on criminal offenses involving the theft of crops, livestock, or honeybees, and making an appropriation

Topics:AgricultureState budgetCrime & correctionsLivestock & confinements

Same legislation: HF 742

Write your legislators about it

Also covers HF 742.

Official bill pageLobbyist declarationsOne-pager to print

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 28, 2019
  2. Done: SubcommitteeMarch 5, 2019
  3. Done: House committeeMarch 13, 2019
  4. Done: Passes the HouseApril 24, 2019
  5. Stopped: Senate committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
  6. Next: Passes the Senate
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The General Assembly adjourned on June 14, 2020. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

House subcommittee

Named March 5, 2019. On March 13, 2019 it recommended amendment and passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Fiscal note

The fiscal impact of HF 742 cannot be estimated because the current criminal code does not differentiate between theft and agricultural theft. The Agricultural Crime Surcharge would be applied in addition to the fine and surcharge imposed for a Class C or Class D felony or an aggravated misdemeanor. 7%. 6% of the amount assessed from the Agricultural Crime Surcharge.

Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

88th General Assembly

HF 553Didn’t advanceHF 742Passed a chamber

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.