Legislators › House
Rep. Derek Wulf
Republican · House District 76 · Black Hawk
In office since 2023 · 2 General Assemblies · Chair, Agriculture
3 of their 4 breaks with their party came on bipartisan votes, where most of both parties voted the same way, so they don’t count against the party-line record.
Votes most like
How often they voted the same way (yes or no) as each House colleague in the 2026 session. How it’s worked out
Most alike
- Joshua Meggers R100%
- Thomas Gerhold R99%
- Bobby Kaufmann R99%
- Carter F. Nordman R99%
- Jacob Bossman R99%
Least alike
- Elinor A. Levin D65%
- David Jacoby D67%
- Mary Lee Madison D68%
- Monica Kurth D68%
- Beth Wessel-Kroeschell D69%
Closest across the aisle: Daniel Gosa (D), 86%.
Lobbying groups they vote with
Rep. Derek Wulf’s contested votes in the 2026 session, compared with the sides 90 organizations registered on those bills.
Most often
- Iowa Baptists For Biblical Values21 of 21 · 100%
- Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition20 of 20 · 100%
- Americans For Prosperity13 of 13 · 100%
- Iowa Minuteman Civil Defense Corps13 of 13 · 100%
- The Family Leader11 of 11 · 100%
- The Family Leader Foundation11 of 11 · 100%
- 1st Amendment Partnership5 of 5 · 100%
- Inspired Life5 of 5 · 100%
Least often
- National Association of Social Workers, Iowa Chapter0 of 3 · 0%
- Iowa Mental Health Counselors Association0 of 3 · 0%
- Iowa Environmental Council0 of 3 · 0%
- Iowa ACEs 3600 of 3 · 0%
- Family Planning Council of Iowa0 of 3 · 0%
- Des Moines Area Religious Council0 of 3 · 0%
- Brain Injury Association of Iowa0 of 3 · 0%
- American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists0 of 3 · 0%
Each legislator’s last floor vote on a bill is compared with the side the organization registered on it (its latest declaration; undecided doesn’t count). Only contested votes count, where at least a tenth of the chamber voted the other way, since most bills pass nearly unanimously. A vote on an amended bill may not be the version that was lobbied. Organizations with fewer than 3 such votes aren’t listed. Lining up with a group doesn’t mean it swayed the vote.
Recent votes
- HF 2801 October 2, 2026Yes
- SF 2472 May 3, 2026Yes
- HF 2800 May 3, 2026Yes
- SJR 11 May 3, 2026Absent
- SF 2484 May 3, 2026Absent
- HF 2799 May 3, 2026Absent
- HF 2771 May 3, 2026Yes
- HF 2531 May 3, 2026Yes
- SF 2478 May 2, 2026Yes
- SF 2490 May 2, 2026Yes
- HF 2542 May 2, 2026Yes
- HF 2765 May 2, 2026Yes
- SF 2493 May 2, 2026Yes
- SF 2497 May 2, 2026Yes
- HF 2617 May 2, 2026Yes
- SF 469 May 2, 2026Yes
- SF 2465 May 2, 2026Yes
- SF 2492 May 2, 2026Yes
- HF 2797 May 2, 2026Yes
- HF 2770 May 2, 2026Absent
- HF 2769 May 2, 2026Absent
- SF 639 May 2, 2026Absent
- SF 2480 May 2, 2026Absent
- HF 2791 May 2, 2026Absent
- HF 2794 May 2, 2026Absent
Votes against their party
- HF 2768 A bill for an act relating to and making appropriations for state government administration and regu…NoApril 27, 2026 · voted no; Republicans voted 56–8 · Roll call
- HF 2617 A bill for an act relating to abandoned vehicles. (Formerly HSB 667 .) Effective date: 07/01/2026.NoMarch 4, 2026 · voted no; Republicans voted 55–11 · Roll call
- HF 2645 A bill for an act relating to the establishment of an electronic court notification system.(Formerly…NoMarch 4, 2026 · voted no; Republicans voted 61–5 · Roll call
- HF 131 A bill for an act relating to matters under the purview of the credit union division of the departme…NoMarch 25, 2024 · voted no; Republicans voted 50–9 · Roll call