Bills › 91st General Assembly

Relating to awarding the costs in administrative hearings or court proceedings involving the collection of tax, penalties, and interest by the department of revenue

Topics:Courts & civil lawTaxes

Same legislation: HSB 14, HF 773, SF 524

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 14, 2025
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 14, 2025
  3. Done: Senate committeeMarch 4, 2025
  4. Skipped: Passes the SenateContinued as SF 524
  5. Next: House committee
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Became SF 524 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 524 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary If a person wins a legal fight against the Department of Revenue over taxes, they can now ask to be paid back for things like lawyer fees, expert witnesses, and court costs. This change removes a previous limit that capped these payments at $25,000. Once a person wins, the Department of Revenue must pay those costs unless they can prove their original position was reasonable.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to the costs of litigation in administrative hearings or court proceedings involving the collection of tax, penalties, and interest (dispute) by the department of revenue (department). The bill changes the costs allowed to be recovered in the dispute. The costs allowed to be recovered under the bill include reasonable court costs; reasonable prevailing market rates for expert witnesses, studies, tests, analysis, or special projects; and reasonable attorney or accountant fees including fees related to the recovery of costs allowed under the bill. The bill strikes the current $25,000 cap recoverable by a taxpayer in a dispute. Under the bill, if the taxpayer substantially prevails in the dispute relating to the amount in controversy or issues involved, the burden of proof shifts to the department to prove that the position of the department was substantially justified. If the department proves the position of the department was substantially justified, the bill prohibits the taxpayer from recovering an award in the dispute. If the taxpayer prevails, the bill requires the department to pay the reasonable costs described in the bill. Under current law, the taxpayer must prove the position of the department was not substantially justified in addition to the amount in controversy and issues involved.

Full bill text2

Senate subcommittee

Named January 14, 2025. On January 15, 2025 it recommended amendment and passage. [].

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

1 written public comment to its subcommittee: January 21, 2025 (1) · on the Legislature’s site

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§421.60

How the Code works3

Lobbying

1 for · 0 against · 8 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.

  • HSB 541 HSB 541
    90th General Assembly · In committee · very similar
    Cleared committee

Matched by wording or an identical title.