Bills › 90th General Assembly

HSB 541Died when the session ended · January 10, 2024

HSB 541

Topics:Courts & civil law

Same legislation: SSB 3036

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 10, 2024
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 10, 2024
  3. Stopped: House committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
  4. Next: Passes the House
  5. Next: Senate committee
  6. Next: Passes the Senate
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The 2024 session adjourned on April 19, 2024, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary If a person wins a legal fight against the Department of Revenue over tax penalties or interest, they can ask to have their lawyer, accountant, or expert witness fees paid back. This law removes the $25,000 limit on those payments and lets a judge or the director of revenue decide the final amount. However, if the Department of Revenue can prove their original position was reasonable, the taxpayer will not be able to get those costs covered.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to the costs of litigation in administrative hearings or court proceedings involving the collection of tax penalties and interest (dispute) by the department of revenue (department). The bill changes the costs allowed to be recovered in the dispute. The costs allowed to be recovered under the bill include reasonable court costs; reasonable prevailing market rates for expert witnesses, studies, tests, analysis, or special projects; and reasonable attorney or accountant fees including fees related to the recovery of costs allowed under the bill. The bill strikes the current $25,000 cap recoverable by a taxpayer in a dispute and provides that the dollar amount of an award in a dispute be determined within the discretion of the director of revenue or court, as applicable. Under the bill, if the taxpayer substantially prevails in the dispute relating to the amount in controversy or issues involved, the burden of proof shifts to the department to prove that the position of the department was substantially justified. If the department proves the position of the department was substantially justified, the bill prohibits the taxpayer from recovering an award in the dispute. Under current law, the taxpayer must prove the position of the department was not substantially justified in addition to the amount in controversy and issues involved.

Full bill text2

House subcommittee

Named January 10, 2024. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§421.60

How the Code works3

Lobbying

0 for · 0 against · 4 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Similar bills

  • HF 773 Relating to awarding the costs in administrative hearings or court proceedings involving t…
    91st General Assembly · Approved by committee
    Very similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.