Bills › 91st General Assembly
Relating to the responsibilities of school districts and charter schools related to the discipline of students who cause violent or nonviolent disruptions
Sponsored by Sen. Kerry Gruenhagen (R)
Topics:K–12 education
Same legislation: SF 2428
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedJanuary 13, 2026
- Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 15, 2026
- Done: Senate committeeFebruary 23, 2026
- Skipped: Passes the SenateContinued as SF 2428
- Next: House committee
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Became SF 2428 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 2428 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Iowa school districts and charter schools must create new rules for disciplining students who cause violent or nonviolent disruptions in the classroom. These rules allow teachers to remove students from class and require principals to follow specific steps before a student can return to the room. If a student is removed for nonviolent reasons multiple times, the school must hold a meeting with parents and counselors to create a behavioral plan.1
Read the official explanation
This bill relates to the responsibilities of school districts and charter schools related to the discipline of students who cause violent or nonviolent disruptions.7(2)(m), charter schools, to adopt, in collaboration with teachers and administrative staff employed by the school, policies for different grade levels that describe how a school may discipline a student for making a threat of violence or causing an incident of violence that results in injury or property damage or assault.65A establishes requirements related to the policies. 65A to require school districts and charter schools to adopt, in collaboration with teachers and administrative staff employed by the school, policies for different grade levels that describe how a school may discipline a student for causing a violent disruption or nonviolent disruption. The bill defines “nonviolent disruption” to include a disruption to classroom instruction that is a result of disorderly conduct, abusive or profane language, bullying, or repeatedly disruptive behavior. The bill defines “violent disruption” to include a disruption to classroom instruction that is a result of a threat of violence or an incident of violence that results in injury, property damage, or assault. The policies must be consistent with the provisions of Code chapter 256B (special education) and rules adopted by the state board of education for purposes of Code chapter 256B and with certain specified federal laws. The policies must require each attendance center within the school district to create a placement review committee that is responsible for determining when a student who was removed from the classroom pursuant to the bill’s provisions may return to the classroom. The bill establishes the membership of the placement review committee. The policies must authorize a teacher to remove a student who causes a nonviolent disruption from the teacher’s classroom and place the student under the supervision of the principal for at least minutes. A student who is removed from the classroom pursuant to this provision is required to make up any work that the student missed while the student was under the supervision of the principal. In addition, the policies must prohibit the principal from returning a student who is removed from the classroom to the teacher’s classroom without the teacher’s consent, unless the placement review committee determines that the student should be returned to the classroom. The policies must also require the principal to inform the teacher of the disciplinary actions taken against the student who was removed from the classroom as soon as is reasonably possible after the student’s removal. The policies must require that if a student is removed from the classroom more than once in one school year, the teacher, a qualified guidance counselor, the student’s parent or legal guardian, if the student is not an emancipated minor, and the student are required to participate in a meeting to discuss the student’s nonviolent disruptions and to establish a behavioral plan and a course of discipline to correct the student’s behavior, which may include placement in an alternative learning environment. The policies must require a teacher to remove a student who causes a violent disruption from the teacher’s classroom and place the student under the supervision of the principal. The policies must prohibit the principal from returning a student who is removed from the classroom pursuant to this provision to the teacher’s classroom without the teacher’s consent, unless the placement review committee determines that the student should be returned to the classroom. However, the placement review committee shall not have the authority to require a student to return to a teacher’s classroom if the teacher removed the student from the teacher’s classroom because the student caused a violent disruption that included the student assaulting the teacher, and the teacher does not consent to allowing the student to return to the teacher’s classroom. The policies must require that a student removed from the classroom pursuant to this provision be suspended, expelled, or placed in an alternative learning environment. The bill makes conforming changes.
Changed since by amendments S-5166, H-8306, S-5087; see Amendments.
Senate subcommittee
Named January 15, 2026. On January 22, 2026 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
2 written public comments to its subcommittee: March 18, 2026 (1), January 22, 2026 (1) · on the Legislature’s site
Fiscal note
AI summary This bill creates a pilot program for one rural and one urban school district to establish attendance centers for eligible students and requires schools to follow new disciplinary processes for disruptive students. The pilot program is estimated to cost a rural district $165,000 annually and an urban district between $1.0 million and $4.4 million annually. School districts and charter schools may also face additional costs for providing alternative learning environments, hiring substitute teachers, or paying staff for meetings and leave.3
From the note: 4 million by an urban district to implement the pilot program. The Bill directs the DE to fully fund the pilot program using moneys appropriated by the General Assembly for the program unless participating school districts have the funds for their participation in the program. The Bill is anticipated to have no fiscal impact on the DE for the implementation of policies regarding disruptive students.
- Final Fiscal Note — Removal of Disruptive Students from Classrooms · May 20, 2026
- Removal of Disruptive Students from Classrooms · April 23, 2026
- Removal of Disruptive Students from Classrooms · April 14, 2026
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
7 for · 4 against · 12 undecided · Who →
Family tree
91st General Assembly
Similar bills
- HF 2435 Relating to education, including by modifying provisions related to when children may enro…91st General Assembly · In committeeVery similar
Matched by wording or an identical title.