Bills › 91st General Assembly

Relating to the operation of driverless-capable vehicles, including associated civil and criminal liability, and making penalties applicable

Topics:Courts & civil lawCrime & correctionsTransportation

Same legislation: SSB 3052, SF 2384, HF 2673

Write your legislators about it

Also covers SSB 3052 and SF 2384 and HF 2673.

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 21, 2026
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 21, 2026
  3. Done: House committeeFebruary 18, 2026
  4. Skipped: Passes the HouseContinued as HF 2673
  5. Next: Senate committee
  6. Next: Passes the Senate
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Became HF 2673 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to HF 2673 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary Self-driving vehicles carrying dangerous materials must now have a human driver behind the wheel. The bill also makes vehicle owners responsible for any injuries, deaths, or property damage caused by their automated vehicles. Additionally, if someone modifies a self-driving system without permission, they can be held liable for any resulting damage.1

Read the official explanation

Under current law, a driverless-capable vehicle equipped with an automated driving system and meeting certain requirements is authorized to operate on highways while performing all real-time operational and tactical functions (dynamic driving task) regardless of whether a conventional human driver is present in the vehicle.519 and all applicable traffic and motor vehicle safety laws. This bill prohibits a driverless-capable vehicle transporting hazardous material from operating without a conventional human driver. secretary of transportation to be capable of posing an unreasonable risk to health, safety, and property when transported in commerce, and which has been so designated.482. _____ than $855. Under current law, an automated driving system that is capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task must be designed to operate within the system’s operational design domain in compliance with the applicable traffic and motor vehicle safety laws and regulations that govern the performance of the dynamic driving task, unless an exemption has been granted to the vehicle by the department of transportation. The bill rephrases this provision to require the system to operate within the system’s operational design domain rather than be designed to operate in that manner. The bill imputes liability to the owner of a driverless-capable vehicle for personal injury, death, or property damage that results in connection with the operation of the vehicle and for violations of traffic or motor vehicle safety laws and regulations. A person who modifies an automated driving system of a driverless-capable vehicle without the manufacturer’s consent is liable for any damage related to the operation of the vehicle, unless the owner of the vehicle directed the person to modify the system, in which case the owner is liable.

Full bill text2

House subcommittee

Named January 21, 2026. On February 16, 2026 it recommended passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

1 written public comment to its subcommittee: February 16, 2026 (1) · on the Legislature’s site

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§321.515A

Amends§321.515

How the Code works3

Lobbying

3 for · 4 against · 15 undecided · Who →

Family tree