Bills › 91st General Assembly

SSB 3118Renumbered as SF 2421 · February 19, 2026

Relating to utilization review organizations’ use of artificial intelligence, prior authorization determinations and exemptions, and prepayment audits, and including applicability provisions

Topics:Health careArtificial intelligence

Same legislation: HF 2438, HF 2635, SF 2421

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 5, 2026
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 5, 2026
  3. Done: Senate committeeFebruary 19, 2026
  4. Done: Passes the SenateMarch 4, 202644–0
  5. Skipped: House committeeSkipped
  6. Done: Passes the HouseMarch 3, 202694–1
  7. Done: To the GovernorMay 6, 2026
  8. Done: Signed into lawMay 13, 2026

Became SF 2421 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 2421 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill relates to utilization review organizations’ use of artificial intelligence, prior authorization determinations and exemptions, and prepayment audits. DIVISION I —— PRIOR AUTHORIZATION —— USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND PEER REVIEW. _____ a health care service (service) based on medical necessity, a URO shall not use an artificial intelligence-based algorithm as the sole basis for a decision to deny, delay, or downgrade the prior authorization request. “Downgrade” is defined in the bill.

Read the full explanation

A URO shall not deny or downgrade a request for prior authorization unless: (1) the decision is made by a qualified reviewer or clinical peer, (2) the URO provides the health care provider (provider) requesting prior authorization a written statement citing the reasons for the decision, explaining the appeals process, and a written attestation as described by the bill. If a request for prior authorization is denied, the URO shall notify the provider within seven days and conduct a consultation as described by the bill. “Clinical peer” and “qualified reviewer” are defined in the bill. If a URO’s decision to deny or downgrade a request for prior authorization is appealed by the requesting provider or covered person, the appeal shall be conducted by a qualified reviewer or clinical peer who was not involved in the initial denial or downgrade. When conducting an appeal of a request for prior authorization, the qualified reviewer or clinical peer shall consider the known clinical aspects of the services under review, including but not limited to medical records relevant to the medical condition and any relevant medical literature submitted by the provider. The commissioner of insurance (commissioner) may adopt rules to administer this division of the bill. This division of the bill applies to requests for prior authorization made before January 1, 2027, if the request has not been finally determined on or before that date, and requests for prior authorization made on or after January 1, 2027. DIVISION II —— PRIOR AUTHORIZATION —— CANCER-RELATED EXEMPTIONS. _____ review requirements on, a covered person for a cancer-related screening or cancer-related preventative service if the screening or service is recommended by the covered person’s health care professional based on the most recently updated national comprehensive cancer network clinical practice guidelines in oncology. The commissioner may adopt rules to administer this division of the bill. This division of the bill applies to health benefit plans delivered, issued for delivery, continued, or renewed on or after January 1, 2027; and requests for prior authorization for a cancer-related screening or cancer-related preventative health care service if the screening or service is recommended by the covered person’s health care professional, the request is made before January 1, 2027, and the request has not been finally determined on or before that date. DIVISION III —— UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS —— PREPAYMENT AUDITS. A URO that conducts a prepayment audit shall notify the provider that submitted the claim of the initiation of the prepayment audit no later than days after the carrier selects the claim for prepayment audit. “Prepayment audit” is defined by the bill. A URO shall complete a prepayment audit and issue a determination on the claim to the provider no later than days after the URO receives all requested documentation regarding the claim from the provider. A provider that submitted a claim that is the subject of a prepayment audit and that receives an adverse determination regarding the claim may appeal the determination no later than days after the provider receives the determination. A URO shall consider an appeal and issue a final determination on the claim no later than calendar days after receiving notice of an appeal. If a URO violates the bill, the claim shall be automatically approved by the URO and promptly paid, including interest. _____ this division of the bill. This division of the bill applies to prepayment audits initiated on or after January 1, 2027.

From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Changed since by amendments S-5067, S-5060, H-8080; see Amendments. Full bill text · What changed before it passed

Senate subcommittee

Named February 5, 2026. On February 10, 2026 it recommended amendment and passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Fiscal note

Division I of the Bill may increase costs to the State of Iowa and the BOR universities’ health plans incurred in responding to audits of clean claims; any potential fiscal impact is unknown but may be significant.

Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§514F.10§514F.8A§514F.8B

Amends§514F.8

Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works

Lobbying

25 for · 6 against · 15 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.