Bills › 91st General Assembly

SF 543Withdrawn · HF 928 became law instead · April 14, 2025

Relating to the conduct of election recounts, providing penalties, and including effective date provisions

Sponsored by the Senate State Government Committee

Proposed by the Secretary of State · all agency proposals

Topics:Elections & votingState government

Same legislation: SSB 1176, HF 596, HF 928

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 24, 2025
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 25, 2025
  3. Done: Senate committeeMarch 5, 2025
  4. Done: Passes the SenateApril 14, 202531–14
  5. Skipped: House committeeSkipped
  6. Done: Passes the HouseMarch 25, 202566–31
  7. Done: To the GovernorMay 19, 2025
  8. Done: Signed into lawJune 2, 2025

HF 928 became law → The same legislation passed as HF 928, so this version was set aside. Go to HF 928 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill relates to the conduct of election recounts. The bill changes the composition of recount boards based on the population of the county. For a county of fewer than 15,000, the board shall consist of a designee of the candidate requesting the recount, a designee of the apparent winning candidate, and a person who is a precinct election official selected by the chief judge of the judicial district in which the canvass occurs. For a county with a population between 15,000 and 49,999, the board shall consist of a designee of the candidate requesting the recount, a designee of the apparent winning candidate, and three persons who are precinct election officials selected by the chief judge of the judicial district in which the canvass occurs.

Read the full explanation

For a county with a population of 50,000 or greater, the board shall consist of two designees of the candidate requesting the recount, two designees of the apparent winning candidate, and three persons who are precinct election officials selected by the chief judge of the judicial district in which the canvass occurs. Members appointed by the chief judge for the recount of a partisan election shall not be comprised of more than one-third of persons who are not members of either of the two political parties whose candidates for president received the most or next-most votes at the last general election for a partisan election and not more than a simple majority of members appointed by a chief judge shall be from the same political party or organization. The bill allows the state commissioner of elections to call for a recount of any election and to advise election recount boards. The bill removes the first and second Monday after an election as a possible date for canvassing an election. on the second day following the board’s canvass of the election. on the second day following the county canvass of the election in question. If automatic tabulating equipment was used to tabulate ballots in the precinct, a request for a recount shall indicate whether the recount shall be conducted using only automated tabulating equipment or by hand. The bill requires the candidate to request the same method of recounting in all counties in which the candidate requests a recount. The state commissioner of elections shall assess a civil penalty of $100 against a candidate for each county in which the candidate was required to request a hand recount but did not. The bill requires the penalty to first be deducted from the recount bond paid by the candidate and to be deposited in the general fund of the state. The bill allows a candidate to withdraw a request for a recount within hours of the completion of an administrative audit by a commissioner. on the sixth day following the canvass of the election. The commissioner shall then inform the board whether the candidate requested a hand recount. The board shall direct the commissioner to retabulate the ballots using the automatic tabulating equipment using the same program as was used to tabulate the votes on election day unless the program is believed or known to be flawed. The board shall recount only the ballots which were voted and counted for the office in question, including disputed ballots. After retabulating, the board shall compare the results to the abstract prepared pursuant to the county board’s canvass and note any discrepancies. If the candidate requested a hand recount, the bill requires the ballots to be separated into categories and tabulated. The board shall then compare the results of the tabulation to the results of the canvass and the automatic recount. If there are discrepancies, the results of the hand recount shall control. The bill then requires the board to reseal and preserve the ballots. The bill requires an election recount board to file its report by days after the canvass of an election for the offices of president and vice president, by days after the canvass of an election for a state office or a seat in the United States Congress, and by days after the canvass of any other election. The bill also requires a county commissioner of elections to notify the state commissioner when the county commissioner receives a recount request for any office elected by the residents of more than one county. Upon verification that a candidate requested a hand count in at least one but not all counties where a recount was requested, the bill also requires the state commissioner to inform each commissioner of a county where a recount was requested that a hand recount shall be performed. The bill allows a candidate or person who requested a recount to accept the results of the original canvass of the election, which will cause the election recount board to cease its work. The bill requires a petition for a recount of an election for a public measure to be submitted not later than two days following the canvass of the votes for the measure rather than three days. The bill changes the makeup of the recount board for a public measure by removing a designee named by the commissioner and a person jointly selected by that person and a designee named in the petition requesting the recount and replacing them with two election officials selected by the chief judge of the judicial district where the canvass occurs. on the sixth day following the county board’s canvass of the election in question. Under current law, a county commissioner of elections may conduct an administrative recount if the commissioner suspects that voting equipment used in the election malfunctioned or that programming errors may have affected the outcome of the election, or if the precinct election officials report counting errors to the commissioner. The bill instead allows the county commissioner of elections to conduct an administrative audit if such circumstances exist. The bill allows political parties, as defined in Code, to appoint observers to witness the audit. The bill changes the clerk of a court of contest for presidential electors and congresspersons from the secretary of state to the clerk of the supreme court. If the clerk of the supreme court is absent or unable to act, the secretary of state shall be the clerk of the court. For elections for state officers, the bill changes the clerk of a contest court to the clerk of the supreme court. If the clerk of the supreme court is absent or unable to act, the secretary of state shall be the clerk of the court. However, if the secretary of state is a party to the contest, the auditor of state shall be the clerk of the court. The bill takes effect upon enactment.

From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Changed since by amendments S-3093, H-1155; see Amendments. Full bill text · What changed before it passed

Senate subcommittee

Named February 25, 2025 (as SSB 1176). On March 4, 2025 it recommended passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§260C.15§43.49§43.56§46.24§47.1§50.12§50.21§50.24§50.48§50.49§50.50§50.51§60.2§61.2

Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works

Lobbying

3 for · 1 against · 10 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.