Bills › 91st General Assembly

SF 390Died when the session ended · February 20, 2025

Relating to vehicles operating with a permit for excessive size or weight, and providing fees

Sponsored by the Senate Transportation Committee

Proposed by the Department of Transportation · their explanation · all agency proposals

Topics:TaxesTransportation

Same legislation: SSB 1043

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 27, 2025
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 27, 2025
  3. Done: Senate committeeFebruary 19, 2025
  4. Stopped: Passes the SenateDied when the General Assembly ended
  5. Next: House committeeFunnel: by March 20, 2026
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The General Assembly adjourned on October 2, 2026. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill relates to vehicles operating with a permit for excessive size or weight (permit). Permits are generally issued by the authority responsible for the maintenance of the system of highways or streets on which the permitted vehicles are authorized to travel. One such permit is an all-systems permit that may be issued by the department of transportation (DOT) to authorize movement on most paved highways or streets, excluding the interstate road system and any highway or street under local authority where the permit is not valid, as determined by the local authority, if indicated to the DOT.

Read the full explanation

Despite local authority determinations, permitted vehicles may still travel the shortest route between loading and unloading sites and valid highways. The bill makes an all-systems permit valid for movement on all primary and secondary roads, including roads designated by a local authority as a truck route, subject to the exceptions for the interstate road system and roads deemed not valid by a local authority. Under the bill, a road designated as not valid is subject to DOT review. If the DOT disagrees with the justification, the dispute must be resolved in accordance with DOT rules. The bill requires a local authority to cooperate with the DOT to find alternate routes if all roads leading to a loading and unloading location used by a permitted vehicle are designated as not valid.463 (maximum gross weight), which varies based on the number of axles and distance between the axles, by more than percent.5 percent. Under current law, containers for international shipment must be considered an indivisible load when transported under a single-trip permit if the vehicle combination does not exceed maximum dimensions, the container is sealed for international shipment and is either being exported or arriving from a foreign country, specified documentation is carried in the vehicle, and the container holds only raw forest products. The bill strikes the requirement that the container hold only raw forest products.9). A vehicle traveling under an oversize or overweight permit is required to be registered for the gross weight of the vehicle and load.23, cannot use that trip permit in lieu of the oversize or overweight vehicle registration requirements. The bill authorizes a vehicle traveling under a single-trip permit to be registered with the DOT on a single-trip basis for the combined gross weight of the vehicle and load. The fee for single-trip registration is $4 per ton exceeding tons.23 trip permit in lieu of registration.

From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text

Senate subcommittee

Named March 3, 2025. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§321E.12§321E.3§321E.8§321E.9

Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works

Lobbying

4 for · 0 against · 12 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.

Similar bills

  • HF 696 Relating to the registration requirements for vehicles of excessive size and weight operat…
    91st General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 979
    Nearly identical

Matched by the wording of each bill’s explanation, or an identical title. Companion bills and renumbered versions of this bill aren’t listed; they’re the same bill.