Bills › 91st General Assembly

Relating to the responsibilities of school districts and charter schools related to the discipline of students who cause violent or nonviolent disruptions

Sponsored by Sen. Kerry Gruenhagen (R)

Topics:K–12 education

Same legislation: SF 2428

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 13, 2026
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 15, 2026
  3. Done: Senate committeeFebruary 23, 2026
  4. Skipped: Passes the SenateContinued as SF 2428
  5. Next: House committee
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Became SF 2428 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 2428 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary Iowa school districts and charter schools must create new rules for disciplining students who cause violent or nonviolent disruptions in the classroom. These rules allow teachers to remove students from class and require principals to follow specific steps before a student can return to the room. If a student is removed for nonviolent reasons multiple times, the school must hold a meeting with parents and counselors to create a behavioral plan.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to the responsibilities of school districts and charter schools related to the discipline of students who cause violent or nonviolent disruptions.7(2)(m), charter schools, to adopt, in collaboration with teachers and administrative staff employed by the school, policies for different grade levels that describe how a school may discipline a student for making a threat of violence or causing an incident of violence that results in injury or property damage or assault.65A establishes requirements related to the policies. 65A to require school districts and charter schools to adopt, in collaboration with teachers and administrative staff employed by the school, policies for different grade levels that describe how a school may discipline a student for causing a violent disruption or nonviolent disruption. The bill defines “nonviolent disruption” to include a disruption to classroom instruction that is a result of disorderly conduct, abusive or profane language, bullying, or repeatedly disruptive behavior. The bill defines “violent disruption” to include a disruption to classroom instruction that is a result of a threat of violence or an incident of violence that results in injury, property damage, or assault. The policies must be consistent with the provisions of Code chapter 256B (special education) and rules adopted by the state board of education for purposes of Code chapter 256B and with certain specified federal laws. The policies must require each attendance center within the school district to create a placement review committee that is responsible for determining when a student who was removed from the classroom pursuant to the bill’s provisions may return to the classroom. The bill establishes the membership of the placement review committee. The policies must authorize a teacher to remove a student who causes a nonviolent disruption from the teacher’s classroom and place the student under the supervision of the principal for at least minutes. A student who is removed from the classroom pursuant to this provision is required to make up any work that the student missed while the student was under the supervision of the principal. In addition, the policies must prohibit the principal from returning a student who is removed from the classroom to the teacher’s classroom without the teacher’s consent, unless the placement review committee determines that the student should be returned to the classroom. The policies must also require the principal to inform the teacher of the disciplinary actions taken against the student who was removed from the classroom as soon as is reasonably possible after the student’s removal. The policies must require that if a student is removed from the classroom more than once in one school year, the teacher, a qualified guidance counselor, the student’s parent or legal guardian, if the student is not an emancipated minor, and the student are required to participate in a meeting to discuss the student’s nonviolent disruptions and to establish a behavioral plan and a course of discipline to correct the student’s behavior, which may include placement in an alternative learning environment. The policies must require a teacher to remove a student who causes a violent disruption from the teacher’s classroom and place the student under the supervision of the principal. The policies must prohibit the principal from returning a student who is removed from the classroom pursuant to this provision to the teacher’s classroom without the teacher’s consent, unless the placement review committee determines that the student should be returned to the classroom. However, the placement review committee shall not have the authority to require a student to return to a teacher’s classroom if the teacher removed the student from the teacher’s classroom because the student caused a violent disruption that included the student assaulting the teacher, and the teacher does not consent to allowing the student to return to the teacher’s classroom. The policies must require that a student removed from the classroom pursuant to this provision be suspended, expelled, or placed in an alternative learning environment. The bill makes conforming changes.

Changed since by amendments S-5166, H-8306, S-5087; see Amendments.

Full bill text · What changed before it passed2

Senate subcommittee

Named January 15, 2026. On January 22, 2026 it recommended passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

2 written public comments to its subcommittee: March 18, 2026 (1), January 22, 2026 (1) · on the Legislature’s site

Fiscal note

AI summary This bill creates a pilot program for one rural and one urban school district to establish attendance centers for eligible students and requires schools to follow new disciplinary processes for disruptive students. The pilot program is estimated to cost a rural district $165,000 annually and an urban district between $1.0 million and $4.4 million annually. School districts and charter schools may also face additional costs for providing alternative learning environments, hiring substitute teachers, or paying staff for meetings and leave.3

Read the fiscal note

Description

Senate File 2428 requires the Department of Education (DE) to develop and administer a pilot program for a rural district and an urban district to establish attendance centers to be used to provide educational services to eligible students, with exceptions for an eligible student’s participation. The Bill provides conditions that must be met for participation. The rural school district and urban school district will be required to submit an annual report to the DE by June 1 of each year, and the DE is required to compile and submit these reports to the General Assembly by June 30 of each year. The pilot program is repealed July 1, 2031. The Bill also requires school districts and charter schools to initiate a disciplinary process when a student causes a violent or nonviolent disruption, with definitions. The process will include removal from the classroom, review of actions, and conditions for readmittance into the classroom or conditions for sustainment of removal. If the principal of a school determines disciplinary action should be taken against a student removed from the classroom, action must be taken and notice given to the parent or guardian of said student. Such action may include suspension or placement into an alternative learning environment, such as a therapeutic classroom. The Bill gives teachers decision-making authority regarding whether a student may be readmitted to the classroom after removal. Trauma support for teachers, students, and other school employees affected by violent and nonviolent disruptions shall be offered, as well as paid leave for teachers and school employees for physical recovery.

The Bill requires the Director of the DE to develop and distribute both model policies regarding disciplinary action to school districts and charter schools and the requirements for a least restrictive environment, pursuant to the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The board of directors of each school district and charter school is then required to adopt and publish policies for different grade levels regarding student discipline that meet requirements outlined in the Bill and under the IDEA. The board of directors must also ensure that conditions regarding each student’s individual education program (IEP) plan are met. Each school district employee responsible for the implementation of a student’s IEP plan, as listed in the Bill, must read all changes to the accommodations and modifications in the IEP plan. After reading the most recent changes, the regular education teacher shall provide written notice to the special education teacher who is part of the IEP team indicating they have read it. An oversight review committee must also be established by the school district, consisting of two teachers at the attendance center and one administrative employee, mental health professional, or behavioral interventionist. The oversight review committee may issue recommendations related to the student removed from the classroom.

The Bill requires school districts to pay costs required by the Bill from State Foundation School Aid per Iowa Code section 25B.2(3) (State Mandates).

Background

The pilot program established by the Bill may be similar to the Therapeutic Classroom Incentive Grant program but is associated with a different funding source and is not administered as a competitive grant program. There are currently 13 urban school districts and 1 rural school district that would meet the definitions of “urban school district” and “rural school district,” respectively, in the Bill.

The Therapeutic Classroom Incentive Grant program currently receives a $2.4 million appropriation annually in the Education Appropriations Act with additional claims-based pupil funding provided through a standing appropriation for Therapeutic Classroom Services. The DE oversees the current Therapeutic Classroom Incentive Grant program and released a 2025 Therapeutic Classroom Report detailing the history of the annually awarded grants. Iowa Code section 256.9 requires the Director of the DE to develop and distribute to school districts and charter schools model policies outlining the school districts’ and the charter schools’ responsibilities relating to the discipline of a student for making a threat of violence or causing an incident of violence that results in injury, property damage, or assault. Iowa Code section 279.65A outlines requirements for policies regarding the discipline of students who make threats of violence or cause incidents of violence. Current law does not include incidences of nonviolent disruptions, as defined in the Bill.

The average daily cost to a school district for a substitute teacher ranges from $120 to $160 per day, depending on the district and length of assignment.

Assumptions

  • The DE and board of directors for school districts and charter schools will be required to adopt and publish policies regarding the disciplinary process for students causing violent and nonviolent disruptions. Costs associated with implementing these policies are anticipated to be minimal.
  • School districts and charter schools may need to provide an alternative learning environment for students who are removed from the classroom for violent or nonviolent disruptions.
  • Substitute teachers may be needed to fill in for teachers attending oversight review meetings or taking a leave of absence after an incident with a disruptive student.
  • One rural school district, which will be the only rural school district to meet the requirements of the Bill, will participate in the pilot program.
  • One of 13 urban school districts will be chosen to participate in the pilot program.
  • The DE will have minimal additional administrative costs to meet the requirements of the Bill.

Fiscal Impact

Senate File 2428 will require annual expenditures of $165,000 by a rural district and between $1.0 million and $4.4 million by an urban district to implement the pilot program. The Bill directs the DE to fully fund the pilot program using moneys appropriated by the General Assembly for the program unless participating school districts have the funds for their participation in the program.

The Bill is anticipated to have no fiscal impact on the DE for the implementation of policies regarding disruptive students. School districts and charter schools may incur costs related to providing alternative learning environments for students removed from the classroom. If an oversight review meeting takes place during the school day or if a teacher were to take time off due to an incident with a disruptive student, schools may be required to employ a substitute teacher. For meetings taking place beyond contract hours, teachers may also receive prorated pay. The Bill requires school districts to pay costs required by the Bill from State Foundation School Aid per Iowa Code section 25B.2(3).

Sources

  • Department of Education
  • Urban Education Network
  • Iowa Association of School Boards

Reading a fiscal note4

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§256.9§256E.7§279.65A

How the Code works5

Lobbying

7 for · 4 against · 12 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Similar bills

  • HF 2435 Relating to education, including by modifying provisions related to when children may enro…
    91st General Assembly · In committee
    Very similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.