Bills › 91st General Assembly

SF 190Died when the session ended · February 3, 2025

Establishing certain privileges for communications made regarding incidents of sexual assault, harassment, or discrimination and creating a special motion for expedited relief in such actions

Sponsored by Sen. Liz Bennett (D), Sen. Tony Bisignano (D), Sen. Matt Blake (D), Sen. Molly Donahue (D), Sen. William A. Dotzler Jr. (D), Sen. Sarah Trone Garriott (D), Sen. Janet Petersen (D), Sen. Herman C. Quirmbach (D), Sen. Art Staed (D), Sen. Thomas Townsend (D), Sen. Janice Weiner (D), Sen. Cindy Winckler (D)

Topics:Courts & civil law

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 3, 2025
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 4, 2025
  3. Stopped: Senate committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
  4. Next: Passes the Senate
  5. Next: House committeeFunnel: by March 20, 2026
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The 2026 session adjourned on May 3, 2026, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill establishes certain privileges for communications made regarding incidents of sexual assault, harassment, or discrimination and creates a special motion for expedited relief in those actions involving defamation, libel, and slander. The bill provides definitions. The bill applies to a cause of action asserted in a civil action against a person involving communications about sexual assault, harassment, or discrimination are not actionable under Code chapter 659 unless made with malice. The bill only applies to a person that has, or at any time had, a reasonable basis to file a complaint of sexual abuse, harassment, or discrimination, whether the complaint is, or was, filed or not.

Read the full explanation

The bill provides for attorney fees and damages available to a prevailing defendant in any action brought under Code chapter 659 (libel and slander) against that defendant for making that communication. The bill allows a defendant in an action of such privileged communication to request an expedited review. The bill further provides for a prevailing defendant in any libel or slander action to recover (1) reasonable attorney fees and costs, (2) noneconomic damages, (3) punitive damages, and (4) any other relief otherwise permitted by law. The bill provides that no later than days after being served with a cause of action to which the bill applies, or at a later time upon showing of good cause, a party may file a special motion for expedited relief to dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause of action. The filing of the special motion stays all other proceedings between the parties, and the court has discretion to stay a proceeding involving another party if the hearing or ruling on motion would adjudicate an issue material to the motion. A hearing shall be held no later than days after filing the motion, unless the court orders a later hearing to allow discovery or for good cause. A stay remains in effect until an order ruling on the motion is entered and the 30-day appeal period following the order has concluded. During a stay, the court may allow limited discovery if a party shows the information is not reasonably available and that specific information is necessary to establish whether a party has satisfied the party’s burden under the bill. The court may also, for good cause, hear and rule on motions unrelated to the special motion and a motion seeking an injunction. The bill provides that a motion for costs, attorney fees, and expenses is not subject to the special motion for expedited relief stay. The parties’ ability to voluntarily dismiss or move to sever is not affected by the special motion for expedited relief stay. The bill provides that in ruling on a special motion for expedited relief, the court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action, or part of a cause of action, if the moving party establishes that either the responding party fails to establish a prima facie case as to each essential element of the cause of action or the moving party establishes that the responding party failed to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted or there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the cause of action or part of the cause of action. The bill provides that the court may award court costs, reasonable attorney fees, and reasonable litigation fees relating to the special motion to the prevailing party.

From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text

Senate subcommittee

Named February 4, 2025. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§659B.1§659B.10§659B.2§659B.3§659B.4§659B.5§659B.6§659B.7§659B.8§659B.9

Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works

Lobbying

3 for · 0 against · 1 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

91st General Assembly

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.

  • SF 2178 Establishing certain privileges for communications made regarding incidents of sexual assa…
    90th General Assembly · In committee · same title
    Cleared committee

Matched by the wording of each bill’s explanation, or an identical title. Companion bills and renumbered versions of this bill aren’t listed; they’re the same bill.