Proyectos de ley › 91.ª Asamblea General
Relating to defense subpoenas in criminal cases, and providing penalties
Proposed by the Attorney General · all agency proposals
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado15 de enero de 2025
- Hecho: Subcomité15 de enero de 2025
- Se detuvo: Comité de la CámaraMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Se saltó: Comité del SenadoSe saltó
- Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado24 de marzo de 202534–15
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2026 terminó el 3 de mayo de 2026, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA People accused of crimes would no longer be able to request documents or evidence on their own. Instead, they must ask a judge for permission and prove that the information is absolutely necessary for their case. If a defendant gets evidence this way, they must also give a copy to the prosecutor within five business days. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to defense subpoenas in criminal cases. _____ acting on the defendant’s behalf shall not issue any subpoena for documents or other evidence except upon application to the court. An application shall not be granted unless a defendant proves by a preponderance of the evidence there is a compelling need for the evidence sought and that such evidence is material, necessary, exculpatory, and admissible at trial; and the evidence sought does not include the private information of a crime victim or any other person except for the defendant’s own private information. Notwithstanding any rule of criminal procedure concerning the issuance of a subpoena, the bill provides that the procedure set forth in the bill is the exclusive mechanism for a criminal defendant or counsel acting on behalf of the defendant to issue a subpoena for documents or other evidence. Documents or other evidence obtained by a subpoena that does not comply with the requirements of the bill shall not be admissible in any criminal action if offered by the defendant, and an attorney who knowingly issues a defense subpoena that does not comply with the requirements of the bill may be sanctioned by the court. An application for a defense subpoena shall not be made or reviewed ex parte. Any documents or evidence obtained by a defense subpoena must be provided to the prosecuting attorney within five business days of obtaining the documents or evidence. The bill provides that upon application by a crime victim or the prosecuting attorney, the court shall appoint an attorney to represent a person or entity served with a defense subpoena, if the person or entity is indigent. The bill provides that an applicant for postconviction relief shall not be entitled to relief on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel when that claim is predicated upon evidence that was obtained through a defense subpoena and required to be disclosed under the bill.
House subcommittee
Named January 15, 2025. On January 23, 2025 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
1 comentario público por escrito a su subcomité: 23 de enero de 2025 (1) · en el sitio de la Legislatura
Nota fiscal
Resumen con IA This bill requires criminal defendants to apply to a court before issuing subpoenas for evidence and requires the court to appoint attorneys for indigent persons served by such subpoenas. The total fiscal impact cannot be estimated, but the cost per criminal case involving defense subpoenas may double and the Indigent Defense Fund is expected to see significant increased costs. Additionally, the Office of the State Public Defender estimates a need to hire 15.0 Investigator 2 full-time equivalent positions at a total cost of $1.3 million to its operating budget. (en inglés)3
Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)
Description
Senate File 571 relates to defense subpoenas in criminal cases.
The Bill disallows a criminal defendant or counsel acting on the defendant’s behalf to issue any subpoena for documents or other evidence except upon application to the court. An application will not be granted unless a defendant proves by a preponderance of the evidence there is a compelling need for the evidence sought and that such evidence is material, necessary, exculpatory, and admissible at trial; and the evidence sought does not include the private information of a crime victim or any other person except for the defendant’s private information. The procedure is the exclusive mechanism for a criminal defendant or counsel acting on behalf of the defendant to issue a subpoena for documents or other evidence. Documents or other evidence obtained by a subpoena that does not comply with the requirements of the Bill will not be admissible in any criminal action if offered by the defendant, and an attorney who knowingly issues a defense subpoena that does not comply with the requirements of the Bill may be sanctioned by the court. An application for a defense subpoena will not be made or reviewed ex parte. Any documents or evidence obtained by a defense subpoena must be provided to the prosecuting attorney within five business days of obtaining the documents or evidence. The Bill requires the court to appoint an attorney to represent a person or entity served with a defense subpoena upon application by a crime victim or the prosecuting attorney if the person or entity is indigent. Counsel appointed must be paid from the Indigent Defense Fund. The Bill provides that an applicant for postconviction relief is not entitled to relief on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel when that claim is predicated upon evidence that was obtained through a defense subpoena and required to be disclosed under the Bill.
Background
Iowa Code section 815.9(1) provides the qualifications for indigency. Iowa Code section 815.11 establishes the Indigent Defense Fund. The Indigent Defense Fund consists of funds appropriated by the General Assembly from the General Fund to the Office of the State Public Defender (SPD) for indigent legal defense by a court-appointed attorney. Approximately $24.7 million was expended from the Indigent Defense Fund in FY 2024 for processing approximately 45,000 criminal claims. The average cost per criminal case in FY 2024 was $550 per case.
In FY 2024, 774 claims for investigators were made on adult criminal cases with an average investigator claim of $902. The current hourly rate for an investigator is $75.
Assumptions
- The number of applications to the court for defense subpoenas is unknown.
- The average cost per criminal case involving defense subpoenas may double from $550 to $1,100 per case.
- The hourly rate for an investigator will remain constant at $75.
- The average claim for an investigator is $902.
- The SPD will require 15.0 Investigator 2 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions at an approximate cost of $89,000 each to meet the increased investigatory needs of public defender employees.
Fiscal Impact
The total fiscal impact of Senate File 571 cannot be estimated, but the additional costs to the SPD operating budget and Indigent Defense Fund are anticipated to be significant. It is anticipated that the Indigent Defense Fund will incur increased costs due to an increase in contract attorney time spent on criminal cases; the use of investigators and time added for investigations; the number of motions, hearings, trials, and appeals; and the use of expert witnesses. As a result, the cost per criminal case involving defense subpoenas may double under the Bill; however, since the number of applications to the court for defense subpoenas cannot be estimated, the total fiscal impact to the Indigent Defense Fund cannot be determined. Additionally, the SPD estimates the need to hire 15.0 Investigator 2 FTE positions, for a total cost of $1.3 million to the SPD operating budget.
Source
- Office of the State Public Defender
- Criminal Procedure, Defense Subpoenas · 24 de marzo de 2025
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Crea§821A.1
Modifica§815.9
Cabildeo
5 a favor · 5 en contra · 5 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
91st General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None became law, though one got through a chamber.
- HF 2616 Relating to defense subpoenas in criminal cases, and providing penalties90th General Assembly · Approved by committee · same titleCleared committee
- SF 2349 Relating to defense subpoenas in criminal cases, and providing penalties90th General Assembly · Passed Senate · nearly identicalPassed a chamber
Matched by wording or an identical title.