Bills › 91st General Assembly

HSB 20Died when the session ended · January 23, 2025

Relating to defense subpoenas in criminal cases, and providing penalties

Topics:Courts & civil law

Same legislation: SSB 1055, SF 571

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 15, 2025
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 15, 2025
  3. Stopped: House committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
  4. Next: Passes the House
  5. Skipped: Senate committeeSkipped
  6. Done: Passes the SenateMarch 24, 202534–15
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The General Assembly adjourned on October 2, 2026. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill relates to defense subpoenas in criminal cases. _____ acting on the defendant’s behalf shall not issue any subpoena for documents or other evidence except upon application to the court. An application shall not be granted unless a defendant proves by a preponderance of the evidence there is a compelling need for the evidence sought and that such evidence is material, necessary, exculpatory, and admissible at trial; and the evidence sought does not include the private information of a crime victim or any other person except for the defendant’s own private information.

Read the full explanation

Notwithstanding any rule of criminal procedure concerning the issuance of a subpoena, the bill provides that the procedure set forth in the bill is the exclusive mechanism for a criminal defendant or counsel acting on behalf of the defendant to issue a subpoena for documents or other evidence. Documents or other evidence obtained by a subpoena that does not comply with the requirements of the bill shall not be admissible in any criminal action if offered by the defendant, and an attorney who knowingly issues a defense subpoena that does not comply with the requirements of the bill may be sanctioned by the court. An application for a defense subpoena shall not be made or reviewed ex parte. Any documents or evidence obtained by a defense subpoena must be provided to the prosecuting attorney within five business days of obtaining the documents or evidence. The bill provides that upon application by a crime victim or the prosecuting attorney, the court shall appoint an attorney to represent a person or entity served with a defense subpoena, if the person or entity is indigent. The bill provides that an applicant for postconviction relief shall not be entitled to relief on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel when that claim is predicated upon evidence that was obtained through a defense subpoena and required to be disclosed under the bill.

From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text

House subcommittee

Named January 15, 2025. On January 23, 2025 it recommended passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Fiscal note

The total fiscal impact of Senate File 571 cannot be estimated, but the additional costs to the SPD operating budget and Indigent Defense Fund are anticipated to be significant.

Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§821A.1

Amends§815.9

Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works

Lobbying

5 for · 5 against · 5 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None became law, though one got through a chamber.

  • HF 2616 Relating to defense subpoenas in criminal cases, and providing penalties
    90th General Assembly · Approved by committee · same title
    Cleared committee
  • SF 2349 Relating to defense subpoenas in criminal cases, and providing penalties
    90th General Assembly · Passed Senate · nearly identical
    Passed a chamber

Matched by the wording of each bill’s explanation, or an identical title. Companion bills and renumbered versions of this bill aren’t listed; they’re the same bill.