Bills › 91st General Assembly
Requiring school districts, charter schools, and innovation zone schools to adopt policies related to carrying out a reduction in force
Sponsored by the House Education Committee
Topics:K–12 education
Same legislation: HSB 217
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 20, 2025
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 20, 2025
- Done: House committeeMarch 4, 2025
- Stopped: Passes the HouseDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: Senate committeeFunnel: by March 20, 2026
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The General Assembly adjourned on October 2, 2026. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
This bill requires school districts, charter schools, and innovation zone schools to adopt policies related to carrying out a reduction in force. The bill defines “administrative staff member” as a school employee who does not hold a license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition issued by the board of educational examiners (BOEE). The bill defines “practitioner” as a school employee who is an administrator, teacher, or other professional licensed by the BOEE who provides educational assistance to students.
Read the full explanation
The bill also defines “practitioner performance” as an assessment of the quality of the practitioner that is measured using factors that include student academic performance, student growth measures, and performance evaluations. Additionally, the bill defines “reduction in force” as the termination of a practitioner’s employment due to economic reasons that include decreased funding, decreased enrollment, and the closure or reorganization of schools in the school system. The bill requires schools to adopt a policy related to carrying out a reduction in force and publish the policy on the school’s internet site within days after adoption. The policy must require the school to consider whether to terminate the employment of administrative staff members prior to carrying out a reduction in force. The policy must also require the school to use practitioner performance as the sole factor or a primary factor when carrying out a reduction in force. Additionally, the policy must identify the factor or factors that are used to measure practitioner performance for purposes of carrying out a reduction in force. The policy must prohibit the school from using a practitioner’s seniority or tenure as the sole factor or a primary factor when carrying out a reduction in force. Also, the policy must include a timeline for notifying practitioners who may be affected by a reduction in force and practitioners whose employment has been terminated due to a reduction in force. Finally, the policy must include a description of any grievance procedures available to a practitioner whose employment is terminated due to a reduction in force.
From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text
House subcommittee
Named February 20, 2025 (as HSB 217). On February 26, 2025 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Iowa Code it changes
Creates§279.87
Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works
Lobbying
0 for · 7 against · 0 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.
Study bill
91st General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.