Sign in

Bills › 91st General Assembly

HF 2700Withdrawn · SF 2426 became law instead · March 31, 2026

Relating to sufficient English language proficiency requirements for commercial drivers, providing penalties, and including applicability provisions

Sponsored by the House Transportation (companion To Lsb 5328sv By Committee on Transportation) Committee

Topics:Transportation

Same legislation: SF 2173, HSB 699, SF 2426

Write your legislators about it

Also covers SF 2173 and HSB 699 and SF 2426.

What changed before it passed
Official bill pageLobbyist declarationsOne-pager to print

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 2, 2026
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 9, 2026
  3. Done: House committeeFebruary 18, 2026
  4. Done: Passes the HouseMarch 31, 202668–24
  5. Skipped: Senate committeeSkipped
  6. Done: Passes the SenateFebruary 25, 202647–0
  7. Done: To the GovernorMay 2, 2026
  8. Done: Signed into lawMay 2, 2026

SF 2426 became law → The same legislation passed as SF 2426, so this version was set aside. Go to SF 2426 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill requires the department of transportation (DOT) to deny the issuance or renewal of a commercial driver’s license (CDL) or commercial learner’s permit (CLP) if the person applying for or renewing the CDL or CLP fails to demonstrate proficiency in the English language, as required in the bill. The bill requires the DOT to examine the English language proficiency of each person who applies for initial issuance or renewal of a CDL or CLP. The examination must require the person to demonstrate the person is able to read and speak the English language sufficiently to converse with the general public, to understand highway traffic signs and signals in the English language, to respond to official inquiries, and to make entries on reports and records, pursuant to federal regulations.

Read the full explanation

The DOT must administer the examination in a computer-based format. The bill does not limit an applicant from retaking the examination, subject to the availability of the examination. The bill prohibits a person who is not sufficiently proficient in the English language from operating a commercial motor vehicle (CMV). A person who violates this provision commits a serious misdemeanor punishable by a $1,000 fine and imprisonment not to exceed one year.8108(8), all fines and fees attributable to CMV violations issued by the department of public safety must be deposited in the road use tax fund (RUTF). Under the bill, a commercial motor carrier is prohibited from employing or engaging the services of a commercial driver, including as an independent contractor, who is not sufficiently proficient in the English language. A carrier who violates this provision commits a serious misdemeanor and is subject to a civil penalty ranging from $3,000 to $10,000 based on the number of violations, to be imposed and collected by the DOT and deposited in the RUTF. A serious misdemeanor under this provision is punishable by confinement for no more than one year and a fine of at least $430 but not more than $2,500. The bill provides notice requirements regarding violations of the bill and provisions for a person who is sufficiently proficient in the English language to take possession of a stopped CMV or transfer the cargo to another CMV. The bill limits liability for damages that result from the tow or impoundment of a CMV if the driver did not possess sufficient English language proficiency. The DOT is prohibited from complying with a provision of the bill if compliance would cause the denial of federal funds or services or otherwise violate federal law.187B applies on and after March 1, 2027, or the date the department of transportation (DOT) submits to the Iowa administrative code editor for publication in the Iowa administrative bulletin a statement by the director of transportation that the applicable phase of the DOT’s new records system is implemented, whichever is earlier. The DOT is also required to forward a copy of the statement to the Iowa Code editor.

From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Changed since by amendments H-8265, H-8054, S-5029; see Amendments. Full bill text · What changed before it passed

House subcommittee

Named February 9, 2026 (as HSB 699). On February 17, 2026 it recommended amendment and passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

2 written public comments to its subcommittee: February 17, 2026 (1), February 11, 2026 (1) · on the Legislature’s site

Fiscal note

Cost: up to $6,200 Compare with other bills

The fiscal impact of the correctional impact cannot be determined because the number of new convictions under the Bill cannot be estimated. The average State cost per serious misdemeanor is between $350 and $6,200. The estimated impact to the General Fund includes operating costs incurred by the Judicial Branch, the Indigent Defense Fund, and the DOC.

The estimate held steady

  1. $6,200 February 25, 2026
  2. $6,200 February 26, 2026
  3. $6,200 February 28, 2026
  4. $6,200 March 2, 2026
  5. $6,200 March 2, 2026
  6. $6,200 April 1, 2026
  7. $6,200 May 27, 2026 · final

The largest dollar figure in each version’s summary.

Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§321.187B§321.449C

Amends§321.177

Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works

Lobbying

3 for · 5 against · 5 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

Study bill

HSB 699Renumbered

91st General Assembly

SF 2173RenumberedSenate companionSF 2426Became lawfrom SF 2173HF 2700Didn’t advancefrom HSB 699

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.