Proyectos de ley › 91.ª Asamblea General
Relating to unlawful practices involving providing a false social security number to an employer or prospective employer, or to a potential employee, and making penalties applicable
Presentado por el comité Labor and Workforce de la Cámara, Rep. Dean Fisher (R)
Temas:Crime & correctionsJobs & workers
La misma legislación: HF 2088
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado15 de enero de 2026
- Hecho: Subcomité12 de febrero de 2026
- Hecho: Comité de la Cámara17 de febrero de 2026
- Se detuvo: Lo aprueba la CámaraMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Comité del SenadoEmbudo: antes del 20 de marzo de 2026
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2026 terminó el 3 de mayo de 2026, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA Employers are prohibited from hiring or keeping workers who use a social security number that does not belong to them. It is also illegal for a person to give a fake social security number to get a job or for an employer to provide a fake number to a potential worker. Companies that break these rules can face large fines, and repeat offenders may have to close their business until their managers complete special training. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to unlawful practices involving providing a false social security number to an employer or prospective employer, or to a potential employee. The bill provides that an employer may not hire or continue to employ an employee whom the employer knows to have provided the employer with a social security number on any documentation for employment that does not belong to the employee. The bill provides that an employer violating the bill is subject to a $10,000 civil penalty to be collected by the department of inspections, appeals, and licensing. For a fourth or subsequent violation, in addition to the civil penalty, an employer must cease operations at the location where the violation occurred until any individual who holds a majority ownership interest in the employer, and all managerial staff at the location, participate in training developed by the department regarding compliance with the bill. The bill provides that it is a fraudulent practice for a person, for the purpose of retaining or obtaining employment, or any other thing of value, to falsely provide an employer or prospective employer with a social security number that does not belong to the person. The bill provides that it is a fraudulent practice for an employer to knowingly provide a potential employee with a fraudulent social security number for the purpose of hiring the potential employee. Penalties for fraudulent practices range from a class “C” felony to a simple misdemeanor based upon the amount of money or value of property or services involved.
Nota fiscal
Cost: up to $369,000 Compare con otros proyectos
Resumen con IA This bill makes it a crime to provide a false social security number for employment and prohibits employers from hiring people they know have provided false numbers. Iowa Workforce Development would see an annual cost of approximately $311,000 to $369,000 to add three new staff positions. The fiscal impact on the justice system and the General Fund cannot be determined because the number of convictions cannot be estimated. (en inglés)3
Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)
Description
House File 2611 relates to unlawful practices involving providing a false social security number to an employer or prospective employer, or to a potential employee.
The Bill prohibits an employer from hiring or continuing to employ an employee whom the employer knows has provided the employer with a false social security number on any documentation for employment.
An employer violating the Bill is subject to a $10,000 civil penalty to be collected by Iowa Workforce Development (IWD). For a fourth or subsequent violation, in addition to the civil penalty, an employer must cease operations at the location where the violation occurred until any individual who holds a majority ownership interest in the employer, and all managerial staff at the location, participate in training developed by the Department regarding compliance with the Bill.
Under the Bill, it is a fraudulent practice for a person, for the purpose of retaining or obtaining employment, or any other thing of value, to falsely provide an employer or prospective employer with a social security number that does not belong to the person. It is a fraudulent practice for an employer to knowingly provide a potential employee with a fraudulent social security number for the purpose of hiring the potential employee.
Penalties for fraudulent practices range from a simple misdemeanor to a Class C felony depending upon the amount of money or value of property or services involved.
Background
A simple misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for up to 30 days or a fine of at least $105 but not more than $855. A serious misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for up to one year and a fine of at least $430 but not more than $2,560. An aggravated misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for up to two years and a fine of at least $855 but not more than $8,540. A Class D felony is punishable by confinement for up to five years and a fine of at least $1,025 but not more than $10,245. A Class C felony is punishable by confinement for up to 10 years and a fine of at least $1,370 but not more than $13,660.
Assumptions
- The following will not change over the projection period: charge, conviction, and sentencing patterns and trends; prisoner length of stay (LOS); revocation rates; plea bargaining; and other criminal justice system policies and practices.
- County jail data is unavailable. For purposes of this analysis, the marginal cost for county jails is assumed to be $50 per day.
- Conviction data reflects the total number of convictions in adult court, which may include multiple convictions per individual. Not all convictions lead to incarceration, and there may be a delay between conviction and prison admission, which can contribute to differences in totals.
- A six-month delay is assumed from the effective date of the Bill to the date the first offender will enter the correctional system.
- Offender-based convictions are a count of individuals convicted of the same offense. Each offender is counted only once per Iowa Code section, regardless of the number of individual convictions.
- Admissions are a count of individuals newly admitted to the Department of Corrections (DOC) for supervision during a selected time period, based on the most serious offense committed.
- Implementation and workload will require three additional full-time equivalent (FTE) positions. According to the IWD, the required job classes and costs of these positions will be as follows:
- 1.0 Attorney position with estimated base salary and benefits ranging from $107,000 to $124,000.
- 2.0 Investigator 2 positions with estimated total base salary and benefits for both positions ranging from $163,000 to $197,000.
- IWD would incur ongoing indirect costs between $41,000 and $48,000.
Correctional Impact
House File 2611 creates a new criminal offense, and the correctional impact cannot be estimated due to a lack of existing conviction data. Figure 1 shows estimates for sentencing to State prison, parole, probation, or Community-Based Corrections (CBC) residential facilities; LOS in months under those supervisions; and supervision marginal costs per day for a serious misdemeanor, aggravated misdemeanor, Class D felony, and Class C felony. Figure 1 — Sentencing Estimates and Length of Stay (LOS) in Months
Conviction Offense Class
Percent
Ordered to
State
Prison
FY 2025 Avg
LOS in
Prison (All Releases)
Marginal
Cost Per
Day
Prison
Percent
Ordered to
Probation
FY 2025
Field Avg
LOS on
Probation
Avg Cost
Per Day
Probation
Marginal
Cost Per
Day CBC
Marginal
Cost Per
Day Jail
FY 2025
Field Avg
LOS on
Parole
Marginal
Cost Per
Day Parole
Serious Misdemeanor 2.3% 7.3 $23.07 44.8% 21.0 $8.00 $16.35 $50.00 N/A $8.00 Aggravated Misdemeanor Non-Persons 31.1% 9.3 $23.07 37.1% 28.4 $8.00 $16.35 $50.00 11.2 $8.00 D Felony Non-Persons 84.2% 12.5 $23.07 69.4% 41.4 $8.00 $16.35 $50.00 15.5 $8.00 C Felony Non-Persons 84.0% 16.8 $23.07 66.4% 51.4 $8.00 $16.35 $50.00 24.3 $8.00 Refer to the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) memo addressed to the General Assembly, Cost Estimates Used for Correctional Impact Statements, dated January 12, 2026, for information related to the correctional system.
Minority Impact
House File 2611 creates a new criminal offense. As a result, the Department of Management (DOM) Division of Data, Planning, and Improvement (DPI) cannot use existing data and cannot be used to estimate the minority impact of the Bill. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Minority Impact Statements, dated January 12, 2026, for information related to minorities in the criminal justice system.
Fiscal Impact
The cost to IWD to add 3.0 FTE positions is approximately $311,000 to $369,000 annually. The fiscal impact on the justice system cannot be determined because the number of convictions cannot be estimated. Figure 2 shows the average State cost per relevant offense. The estimated impact to the General Fund includes operating costs incurred by the Judicial Branch, the Indigent Defense Fund, and the DOC. The costs would be incurred across multiple fiscal years for prison and parole supervision.
Figure 2 — Average State Cost Per Offense
Offense Class Average Cost
Serious Misdemeanor $350 to $6,200 Aggravated Misdemeanor $8,300 to $12,200 Class D Felony $13,000 to $18,100 Class C Felony $15,000 to $25,200
Sources
- Iowa Workforce Development
- Department of Corrections
- Division of Data, Planning, and Improvement (DPI), Department of Management (DOM)
- Providing False Social Security Number to Employers, Criminal Offense · 6 de marzo de 2026 · $369,000
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Modifica§714.8
Cabildeo
4 a favor · 0 en contra · 2 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
91st General Assembly