Bills › 91st General Assembly

HF 1016Withdrawn · SF 565 became law instead · April 24, 2025

Providing for the continuation of health insurance in certain circumstances for the surviving spouse and each surviving child of employees of the state of Iowa and including retroactive applicability provisions

Sponsored by the House Appropriations (successor To Hsb 112) Committee

Topics:State budgetHealth care

Same legislation: SSB 1039, HSB 112, SF 565, HF 913

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedMarch 10, 2025
  2. Done: SubcommitteeApril 8, 2025
  3. Done: House committeeApril 16, 2025
  4. Done: Passes the HouseApril 24, 202589–0
  5. Skipped: Senate committeeSkipped
  6. Done: Passes the SenateApril 22, 202546–0
  7. Done: To the GovernorMay 19, 2025
  8. Done: Signed into lawMay 19, 2025

SF 565 became law → The same legislation passed as SF 565, so this version was set aside. Go to SF 565 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill provides for the continuation of health insurance (insurance) in certain circumstances for the surviving spouse (spouse) and each surviving child (child) of an eligible employee of the state of Iowa (eligible employee). The bill defines “eligible employee” as an employee of the state of Iowa, including but not limited to any department, agency, board, bureau, or commission of the state of Iowa, who is participating in a state health or medical group insurance plan under Code chapter 509A which covers the employee at the time of death of the employee and whose death is determined by the department of administrative services to be the direct and proximate result of a traumatic personal injury incurred in the performance of their work duties, and to whom none of the factors detailed in the bill apply.

Read the full explanation

The state must permit continuation of existing insurance, or reenrollment in previously existing insurance, for the spouse and each child of an eligible employee. The bill requires the state to permit continuation of existing insurance for the spouse and each child of an employee who dies and who is reasonably expected to be determined to be an eligible employee, until the determination of eligibility is made. The bill does not require the state to pay for the cost of the insurance; however, the state may pay the full cost or a portion of the cost, in which case the department, agency, board, bureau, commission, or other employing entity of the eligible employee shall bear the cost of such insurance. If the full cost or a portion of the cost of the insurance is not paid by the state, the spouse and each child who is eligible for insurance may elect to continue coverage by paying that portion of the cost of the insurance not paid by the state. The state must notify the provider of the insurance of the identity of the spouse and each child who is to be provided insurance pursuant to the requirements of the bill. The bill does not require continuation of insurance if the spouse or a child who would otherwise be entitled to continuation of insurance was, through the actions of the spouse or of the child, a substantial contributing factor to the death of the eligible employee, or the spouse or a child becomes ineligible for insurance coverage under the terms of the insurance coverage obtained by the state for reasons other than the death of the eligible employee. The bill applies retroactively to January 1, 2024.

From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Changed since by amendments H-1278, S-3122; see Amendments. Full bill text · What changed before it passed

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§509A.13E

Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works

Lobbying

6 for · 0 against · 8 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.