Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado10 de enero de 2024
  2. Hecho: Subcomité10 de enero de 2024
  3. Hecho: Comité del Senado13 de febrero de 2024
  4. Se saltó: Lo aprueba el SenadoSigue como SF 2349
  5. Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Ahora es SF 2349 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a SF 2349 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA People accused of crimes would no longer be able to request documents or evidence on their own. Instead, they must ask a judge for permission and prove that the information is absolutely necessary for their case. If a lawyer breaks these new rules, they could face a misdemeanor charge. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to defense subpoenas in criminal cases. _____ court. An application shall not be granted unless a defendant proves by clear and convincing evidence there is a compelling need for the evidence sought and that such evidence is material, necessary, exculpatory, and admissible at trial; and the evidence sought does not include the private information of a crime victim or any other person except for the defendant’s own private information. Notwithstanding any rule of criminal procedure concerning the issuance of a subpoena, the bill provides that the procedure set forth in the bill is the exclusive mechanism for a criminal defendant or counsel acting on behalf of the defendant to issue a subpoena for documents or other evidence. Documents or other evidence obtained by a subpoena that does not comply with the requirements of the bill shall not be admissible in any criminal action if offered by the defendant, and an attorney who knowingly issues a defense subpoena that does not comply with the requirements of the bill commits a simple misdemeanor. An application for a defense subpoena shall not be made or reviewed ex parte. Any documents or evidence obtained by a defense subpoena must be provided to the prosecuting attorney within hours of obtaining the documents or evidence. The bill provides that upon application by a crime victim or the prosecuting attorney, the court shall appoint an attorney to represent a person or entity served with a defense subpoena, if the person or entity is indigent. The bill provides that an applicant for postconviction relief shall not be entitled to relief on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel as a result of evidence obtained through a defense subpoena.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

Senate subcommittee

Named January 10, 2024. On January 23, 2024 it recommended amendment and passage. [].

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Nota fiscal

Resumen con IA This bill requires criminal defendants to get court approval before issuing subpoenas for evidence and provides for court-appointed attorneys to represent those served with such subpoenas if they are indigent. The total fiscal impact cannot be estimated, but the costs to the Office of the State Public Defender are anticipated to be significant and will be paid from the Indigent Defense Fund. The Office of the State Public Defender also estimates a need for 15.0 Investigator 2 full-time equivalent positions at a cost of $1.0 million to its operating budget. (en inglés)3

Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)

Description

House File 2616 relates to defense subpoenas in criminal actions and provides the following:

  • A criminal defendant or counsel acting on the defendant’s behalf may not issue any subpoena for documents or evidence except upon application to the court. The defendant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence all of the following:
  • There is a compelling need for the evidence sought, and the evidence is material, necessary, exculpatory, and admissible at trial.
  • The evidence sought does not include the private information of a crime victim or any other person except for the defendant’s private information.
  • Notwithstanding any rule of criminal procedure concerning the issuance of a subpoena, the Bill serves as the exclusive mechanism for a criminal defendant or counsel acting on the defendant’s behalf to issue a subpoena for documents or other evidence.
  • An application for a defense subpoena must not be filed or reviewed ex parte.
  • The prosecuting attorney is not required to execute or effectuate any order or subpoena issued pursuant to the Bill.
  • A crime victim or other party who is the subject of a subpoena must not be required by the court to execute a waiver.
  • Upon application by a crime victim or the prosecuting attorney, the court must appoint an attorney to represent the person or entity served with a defense subpoena if the person or entity is determined to be indigent. Counsel appointed for this purpose pursuant to the Bill must be paid from the Indigent Defense Fund.
  • Documents or other evidence obtained through a defense subpoena must be provided to the prosecuting attorney within three business days after the receipt of the documents or other evidence.
  • Documents or other evidence obtained through a defense subpoena that does not comply with the requirements in the Bill are not admissible in any criminal action if offered by the defendant.
  • The court may sanction an attorney for knowingly issuing a defense subpoena in violation of the Bill.
  • An applicant for postconviction relief is not entitled to relief on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel as a result of evidence obtained through a defense subpoena.

Background

Iowa Code section 815.9(1) provides the qualifications for indigency. Iowa Code section 815.11 establishes the Indigent Defense Fund. The Indigent Defense Fund consists of funds appropriated by the General Assembly from the General Fund to the Office of the State Public Defender (SPD) for indigent legal defense by a court-appointed attorney. Approximately $22.7 million was expended from the Indigent Defense Fund in FY 2023 for processing criminal claims. The average cost per criminal case in FY 2023 was $524 per case.

Assumptions

  • Expanding representation by the SPD to indigent individuals who receive a defense subpoena may significantly increase costs to the Indigent Defense Fund due to an increase in attorney time spent on criminal cases; the time needed for investigation; the number of motions, hearings, trials, and appeals; and the use of expert witnesses. The number of individuals to which this will apply cannot be estimated.
  • The requirement to provide information obtained through a subpoena to the prosecutor within three days may also increase costs to the Indigent Defense Fund due to additional staff needed to comply.
  • The SPD will require 15.0 Investigator 2 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions at a cost of $67,000 each to meet the increased investigatory needs of public defender employees and contract attorneys.
  • The number of applications to the court for defense subpoenas is unknown.
  • The average cost per criminal case is estimated to double from $524 to $1,048 per case.

Fiscal Impact

The total fiscal impact of House File 2616 cannot be estimated, but the costs to the SPD are anticipated to be significant. Under the Bill, the amount of attorney time spent on a case is estimated to increase due to the increased numbers of motions, hearings, and investigations, and fewer resolutions before trials which may increase the average cost per criminal case handled by court-appointed attorneys. The costs will be incurred by the Indigent Defense Fund. Additionally, the SPD estimates the need to hire 15.0 Investigator 2 FTE positions, for a total cost of $1.0 million to the SPD operating budget.

Sources

  • Office of the State Public Defender
  • Legislative Services Agency

Cómo leer una nota fiscal4

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§821A.1

Modifica§815.9

Cómo funciona el Código5

Cabildeo

4 a favor · 4 en contra · 9 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Similar bills

  • HSB 20 Relating to defense subpoenas in criminal cases, and providing penalties
    91st General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage
    Nearly identical

Matched by wording or an identical title.