Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado22 de febrero de 2023
  2. Hecho: Subcomité22 de febrero de 2023
  3. Hecho: Comité del Senado2 de marzo de 2023
  4. Se saltó: Lo aprueba el SenadoSigue como SF 489
  5. Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Ahora es SF 489 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a SF 489 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA Local governments must get a permit from the Department of Transportation before using cameras or other devices to automatically catch traffic violators. These systems can only issue tickets for speeding, running red lights, or failing to stop at intersections and railroad crossings. Drivers must be notified with permanent signs before they reach a location where these systems are being used. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill creates a new Code chapter 321P which regulates the use of automated or remote systems for traffic law enforcement (systems). A system is a camera or other optical device designed to work in conjunction with an official traffic control signal or speed measuring device to detect motor vehicles being operated in violation of traffic laws, the use of which results in the issuance of citations sent through the mail or by electronic means. The bill requires local authorities to hold a valid permit from the department of transportation (DOT) before using a system or adopting, enforcing, or otherwise administering an ordinance authorizing the use of a system. A local authority may apply for a permit by submitting an application to the DOT. The DOT may approve or disapprove the application based on the DOT’s determination that a system is appropriate and necessary and the least restrictive means to address the critical traffic safety issues at a location. The DOT must only approve one permit for a local authority, which sets forth all locations at which a local authority is authorized to use a system. A local authority may submit an application to the DOT to update the local authority’s permit with a new location. The bill lists the required information to provide on an application for a permit, including but not limited to records relating to traffic violations and traffic collisions and accidents occurring at the location; an analysis of existing traffic speed data, posted speed limits, traffic volume data, and intersection and roadway measurements; the proposed cause of critical traffic safety issues; and alternative methods to improve traffic safety. _____ The bill limits the use of a system to issue citations only for violations for failure to yield or stop at an intersection controlled by a traffic control signal or at a railroad crossing, or exceeding the speed limit by more than miles per hour (MPH). A local authority cannot use a mobile system to issue citations. However, a local authority may issue a warning memorandum to the owner of a vehicle that was operated in violation of a traffic law if the violation was detected using a system, including a mobile system. The bill requires a local authority to provide certain notice to drivers about the use of a system. Permanent signage providing notice to drivers that a system is in place must be erected at least 500 feet but not more than 1,000 feet along the approach of any highway where the system is used. The signs must be erected at the expense of the local authority. Every location where an automated or remote system is used must be clearly identified at least days prior to the system enforcing any detected violations. A local authority must provide an annual report to the DOT about the local authority’s systems. A local authority is prohibited from issuing a citation or warning memorandum for a violation detected by a system until a peace officer of the local authority has reviewed and approved the recorded photograph or video to affirm a traffic violation occurred.8A. The maximum amount for a fine for an excessive speed violation is set forth in the bill based on MPH in excess of the limit, and is doubled if the violation occurs in a road work zone. A system not in compliance with the bill cannot be used to detect violations. A citation issued while the system is not in compliance is void and unenforceable. _____ of a motor vehicle, but also requires local authorities to provide an opportunity for an owner to identify another person who was operating the vehicle during the violation. However, the owner must still pay the associated fine if the other person does not pay the fine. A local authority that collects revenue for traffic violations detected by a system must remit monthly to the treasurer of state percent of the moneys from the use of the system, not including the cost to install, operate, and maintain the system. These moneys are deposited in the road use tax fund. The remaining moneys retained by the local authority are required to be used only for public safety or improvements to transportation infrastructure within the local authority’s jurisdiction. The bill requires that systems be installed to avoid the effect of camera flash on drivers and to prevent capturing recordings of persons in the vehicle. The bill regulates the required system maintenance and frequency of maintenance, including system compliance with generally accepted procedures for the system, daily internal calibrations, and monthly calibration by a person trained in the calibration of the system. The bill requires a local authority to maintain a monthly log detailing the maintenance and calibration records. The bill provides that a local authority using a system prior to April 1, 2023, may submit to the DOT by April 1, 2023, a list of system locations and justifications for placement and use. The department may, by July 1, 2023, issue a permit to the local authority. If, on July 1, 2023, the local authority has not been issued a permit, the local authority must cease using all systems until the local authority obtains a permit under the bill. A local authority using a system at a location for the first time on or after April 1, 2023, shall not be issued a permit before July 1, 2025. These provisions of the bill take effect upon enactment.

Cambiado después por las enmiendas S-5141, H-8292, H-8286; vea Enmiendas.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse2

Senate subcommittee

Named February 22, 2023. On February 28, 2023 it recommended amendment and passage. [].

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

88 comentarios públicos por escrito a su subcomité: 28 de febrero de 2023 (88) · en el sitio de la Legislatura

Nota fiscal

Resumen con IA This bill regulates how local authorities use automated or remote systems, such as cameras, to issue citations for speeding violations. It is estimated to reduce local revenue for the city of Buffalo by $121,000 and for the city of LeClaire by $341,000 due to the loss of mobile systems. The full fiscal impact of the bill across all local authorities cannot be estimated. (en inglés)3

Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)

Description

House File 2681 regulates the use of automated or remote systems for traffic law enforcement (ATE system).

Division I — Automated or Remote Systems for Traffic Law Enforcement — Automatic

Registration Plate Readers

“Automated or remote system for traffic law enforcement” is defined in the Bill as a camera or other optical device designed to work in conjunction with a speed measuring device to detect motor vehicles being operated in violation of the speed limit, the use of which results in the issuance of citations sent through the mail or by electronic means.

Division I requires local authorities to hold a valid permit from the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) before using an ATE system. The DOT is required to adopt administrative rules for the ATE systems. The DOT is authorized to determine whether an ATE system is appropriate and necessary and the least restrictive means to address the traffic safety issues at a location. The Bill establishes requirements that must be included in an application for a permit. A local authority is only authorized to use an ATE system to issue citations for traffic violations exceeding the speed limit by greater than 10 miles per hour. A local authority with a population of 20,000 or less is prohibited from using a mobile ATE system to issue citations but may issue warnings for violations detected by a mobile ATE system.

Data collected by automatic registration plate readers must be deleted within 30 days with exceptions for certain circumstances. A person who violates these automatic registration plate reader requirements commits a simple misdemeanor.

Division I of the Bill provides for signage and reporting requirements for ATE systems. The Bill also provides requirements for the installation and maintenance of an ATE system, including the requirement for a monthly calibration of an ATE system. The Bill requires a local authority using an ATE system to provide an annual report by March 1 to the DOT and to post on the local authority’s website detailing the number of traffic collisions and accidents that occurred at each location an ATE system is used, the number of citations issued, and any other relevant information.

Local authorities are required to review and approve a recorded photograph or video of a violation captured by an ATE system before a citation or warning is issued. For excessive speed violations detected by an ATE system, the citation amount must not exceed $75 for speeds greater than 10 miles and up to 20 miles per hour over the speed limit, $100 for speeds greater than 20 and up to 25 miles per hour over the speed limit, $250 for speeds greater than 25 and up to 30 miles per hour over the speed limit, and $500 for speeds greater than 30 miles per hour over the speed limit. These amounts are doubled if the violation occurs in a road work zone. All violations detected by an ATE system are civil infractions.

Division I requires local authorities to use revenue received from the use of an ATE system, minus the costs to install, operate, and maintain the system, to fund transportation infrastructure improvement projects or to offset costs related to the operation of a police or fire department. Division II — Existing Systems To continue to operate ATE systems that were used prior to January 1, 2024, a local authority is required to submit a list of ATE system locations and justifications for placement and use to the DOT by July 1, 2024. The DOT is required to issue a permit by October 1, 2024, to every local authority that provides valid submissions. A local authority using an ATE system prior to January 1, 2024, may continue to use the ATE system until a permit is received unless it is a mobile ATE system prohibited under the Bill. If a local authority has not been issued a permit by October 1, 2024, the local authority must cease using all ATE systems until the local authority obtains a permit. A local authority using an ATE system at a location for the first time on or after January 1, 2024, shall not be issued a permit by the DOT before July 1, 2026. Division II of the Bill takes effect upon enactment.

Background

As of January 2024, the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) is aware of 25 cities and towns in Iowa that operate an ATE system or systems, including Sioux City, Cedar Rapids, Davenport, Muscatine, Fort Dodge, Council Bluffs, Des Moines, Waterloo, Fayette, West Union, LeClaire, Strawberry Point, Hazleton, Hudson, Chester, Buffalo, Bellevue, Miles, Independence, Oelwein, Prairie City, Webster City, Marshalltown, Marion, and Postville. Data is not available at this time regarding the use of ATE systems in additional cities or towns. As of January 15, 2024, the LSA obtained data from Cedar Rapids, Council Bluffs, Davenport, Des Moines, LeClaire, Muscatine, Waterloo, Buffalo, Fayette, and Marshalltown regarding their current ATE systems. Sioux City recently changed its ATE system provider and does not have accurate data for a full year. Of the 25 cities and towns that currently operate an ATE system, 15 have populations of less than 20,000; however, the number of cities and towns that operate mobile ATEs is unknown. Figure 1 provides data obtained by the LSA related to the number of ATE devices, base cost per violation, vendors’ share of revenues, and local authorities’ share of revenues for the last full fiscal year. Figure 2 shows each city’s use of ATE system revenue.

Figure 1 — Data Provided for Fiscal Year 2023 Figure 2 — Local Uses for ATE System Revenue A simple misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than 30 days and a fine of at least $105 but not more than $855.

Assumptions

  • The number of cities and towns that currently operate ATE systems is unknown.
  • It is unknown how many local authorities with ATE systems that were used prior to January 1, 2024, will receive a permit from the DOT by October 1, 2024, for continued use of their ATE systems.
  • Local jurisdictions may be required to reduce the amount charged for a single citation for speeding violations as provided in the Bill.
  • For cities with a population of less than 20,000, the local authority revenue collected annually by mobile ATEs is in proportion to the number of mobile ATEs the local authority has as a percentage of that total number of operating ATEs. Revenue to the cities of Buffalo and LeClaire will be reduced by 33.0% and 20.0%, respectively, due to the removal of mobile ATE systems.
  • Marginal costs for county jails cannot be estimated due to a lack of data. For purposes of this analysis, the marginal cost for county jails is assumed to be $50 per day.

Correctional Impact

House File 2681 creates a new simple misdemeanor, and the correctional impact cannot be estimated for the Bill due to a lack of existing conviction data. A conviction for a simple misdemeanor does not result in a prison sentence but does carry the possibility of confinement in jail for up to 30 days. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Cost Estimates Used for Correctional Impact Statements, dated January 16, 2024, for information related to the correctional system.

Minority Impact

House File 2681 creates a new offense. As a result, the Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning (CJJP) of the Department of Management cannot use existing data to estimate the minority impact of the Bill. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Minority Impact Statement, dated January 16, 2024, for information related to minorities in the criminal justice system.

Fiscal Impact

House File 2681 is estimated to reduce local revenue by $121,000 to the city of Buffalo and $341,000 to the city of LeClaire due to the loss of the mobile ATE system. However, the full fiscal impact of the Bill across all localities cannot be estimated.

Sources

  • Department of Transportation
  • Local authorities
  • Legislative Services Agency calculations

Cómo cambió el cálculo

  1. $362,813 8 de abril de 2024
  2. $341,000 12 de abril de 2024
  3. $341,000 9 de mayo de 2024 · final
4

Cómo leer una nota fiscal5

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§321P.1§321P.2§321P.3§321P.4§321P.5§321P.6§321P.7§321P.8

Cómo funciona el Código6

Cabildeo

7 a favor · 4 en contra · 17 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Similar bills

  • HSB 161 HSB 161
    90th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 629
    Nearly identical

Matched by wording or an identical title.