Bills › 90th General Assembly
Regulating the use of automated or remote systems for traffic law enforcement, and including effective date provisions
Sponsored by the Senate Transportation Committee
Topics:Taxes
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedMarch 2, 2023
- Done: SubcommitteeApril 4, 2023
- Done: Senate committeeMarch 2, 2023
- Done: Passes the SenateApril 15, 202446–1
- Skipped: House committeeSkipped
- Done: Passes the HouseApril 9, 202485–12
- Done: To the GovernorApril 23, 2024
- Done: Signed into lawMay 17, 2024
Became SF 2408 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 2408 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
This bill creates a new Code chapter 321P which regulates the use of automated or remote systems for traffic law enforcement (systems). A system is a camera or other optical device designed to work in conjunction with an official traffic control signal or speed measuring device to detect motor vehicles being operated in violation of traffic laws, the use of which results in the issuance of citations sent through the mail or by electronic means. The bill requires local authorities to hold a valid permit from the department of transportation (DOT) before using a system or adopting, enforcing, or otherwise administering an ordinance authorizing the use of a system.
Read the full explanation
A local authority may apply for a permit by submitting an application to the DOT. The DOT may approve or disapprove the application based on the DOT’s determination that a system is appropriate and necessary and the least restrictive means to address the critical traffic safety issues at a location. The DOT must only approve one permit for a local authority, which sets forth all locations at which a local authority is authorized to use a system. A local authority may submit an application to the DOT to update the local authority’s permit with a new location. The bill lists the required information to provide on an application for a permit, including but not limited to records relating to traffic violations and traffic collisions and accidents occurring at the location; an analysis of existing traffic speed data, posted speed limits, traffic volume data, and intersection and roadway measurements; the proposed cause of critical traffic safety issues; and alternative methods to improve traffic safety. The bill limits the use of a system to issue citations only for violations for failure to yield or stop at an intersection controlled by a traffic control signal or at a railroad crossing, or exceeding the speed limit by more than miles per hour (MPH). A local authority cannot use a mobile system to issue citations. However, a local authority may issue a warning memorandum to the owner of a vehicle that was operated in violation of a traffic law if the violation was detected using a system, including a mobile system. The bill requires a local authority to provide certain notice to drivers about the use of a system. Permanent signage providing notice to drivers that a system is in place must be erected at least 500 feet but not more than 1,000 feet along the approach of any highway where the system is used. The signs must be erected at the expense of the local authority. Every location where an automated or remote system is used must be clearly identified at least days prior to the system enforcing any detected violations. A local authority must provide an annual report to the DOT about the local authority’s systems. A local authority is prohibited from issuing a citation or warning memorandum for a violation detected by a system until a peace officer of the local authority has reviewed and approved the recorded photograph or video to affirm a traffic violation occurred.8A. The maximum amount for a fine for an excessive speed violation is set forth in the bill based on MPH in excess of the limit, and is doubled if the violation occurs in a road work zone. A system not in compliance with the bill cannot be used to detect violations. A citation issued while the system is not in compliance is void and unenforceable. The bill requires system citations to be issued to the owner of a motor vehicle, but also requires local authorities to provide an opportunity for an owner to identify another person who was operating the vehicle during the violation. However, the owner must still pay the associated fine if the other person does not pay the fine. A local authority that collects revenue for traffic violations detected by a system must remit monthly to the treasurer of state percent of the moneys from the use of the system, not including the cost to install, operate, and maintain the system. These moneys are deposited in the road use tax fund. The remaining moneys retained by the local authority are required to be used only for public safety or improvements to transportation infrastructure within the local authority’s jurisdiction. The bill requires that systems be installed to avoid the effect of camera flash on drivers and to prevent capturing recordings of persons in the vehicle. The bill regulates the required system maintenance and frequency of maintenance, including system compliance with generally accepted procedures for the system, daily internal calibrations, and monthly calibration by a person trained in the calibration of the system. The bill requires a local authority to maintain a monthly log detailing the maintenance and calibration records. The bill provides that a local authority using a system prior to April 1, 2023, may submit to the DOT by April 1, 2023, a list of system locations and justifications for placement and use. The department may, by July 1, 2023, issue a permit to the local authority. If, on July 1, 2023, the local authority has not been issued a permit, the local authority must cease using all systems until the local authority obtains a permit under the bill. A local authority using a system at a location for the first time on or after April 1, 2023, shall not be issued a permit before July 1, 2025. These provisions of the bill take effect upon enactment.
From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text · What changed before it passed
Senate subcommittee
Named April 4, 2023. On April 24, 2023 it recommended passage. [].
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Fiscal note
Can’t be estimated Compare with other bills
House File 2681 is estimated to reduce local revenue by $121,000 to the city of Buffalo and $341,000 to the city of LeClaire due to the loss of the mobile ATE system. However, the full fiscal impact of the Bill across all localities cannot be estimated.
- Final Fiscal Note — Automated Traffic Enforcement, Speed Cameras · May 9, 2024
- Automated Traffic Enforcement, Speed Cameras · April 12, 2024
- Automated Traffic Enforcement, Speed Cameras · April 8, 2024
- Traffic Cameras · March 29, 2024
- Traffic Cameras · March 21, 2023
Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note
Iowa Code it changes
Creates§321P.1§321P.2§321P.3§321P.4§321P.5§321P.6§321P.7§321P.8
Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works
Lobbying
7 for · 4 against · 17 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.
Similar bills
- HF 629 Relating to the use of automated traffic enforcement systems on the primary road system90th General Assembly · Approved by committeeNearly identical
Matched by the wording of each bill’s explanation, or an identical title. Companion bills and renumbered versions of this bill aren’t listed; they’re the same bill.