Bills › 90th General Assembly
Relating to damages owed by a party at fault in crashes and collisions involving commercial motor vehicles
Topics:Transportation
Same legislation: SF 499
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 20, 2023
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 22, 2023
- Done: Senate committeeMarch 2, 2023
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: House committee
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Became SF 499 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 499 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
This bill relates to damages owed by a party at fault in crashes and collisions involving commercial motor vehicles (CMVs). The bill requires a party responsible who is at fault in a crash or collision involving a CMV to arrange for and pay the costs associated with the provision of a like replacement CMV to be delivered to the owner or operator of the damaged CMV, if requested by such owner or operator, without unnecessary delay. The like replacement CMV must be provided by the person at fault until the required repairs to the damaged CMV are completed or the damaged CMV is ready to be fully put back into service, whichever occurs first.
Read the full explanation
A party responsible who fails to arrange and provide a like replacement CMV must reimburse the owner or operator of the damaged CMV for the costs incurred by the owner or operator to obtain a like replacement CMV, including but not limited to rental charges, to use until the required repairs to the damaged CMV are completed or the damaged CMV is placed back into service by the owner or operator, whichever occurs first. The bill requires a party responsible who is at fault and causes damage to a CMV in a crash or collision to compensate the owner or operator of the damaged CMV for each day the owner or operator is unable to operate the CMV, or a like replacement CMV provided by the person at fault, as a result of the crash or collision. The compensation must equal the average of revenue the owner or operator received for each day the CMV was in service based on the previous in-service days. The bill authorizes the owner or operator of a damaged CMV to waive the provisions requiring a party responsible to provide a like replacement CMV. If so waived, the party responsible who is at fault is not required to provide a like replacement CMV but must compensate the owner or operator of the damaged CMV as required under the bill. Under current law, any damages for fault resulting in injury to property must be diminished in proportion to the amount of fault attributable to the claimant. Such comparative fault considerations do not apply to the bill.
From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text
Senate subcommittee
Named February 22, 2023. On February 28, 2023 it recommended passage. [].
- Sen. Adrian Dickey REmail
- Sen. T. Taylor
- Sen. Scott Webster REmail
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Iowa Code it changes
Creates§321.274
Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works
Lobbying
2 for · 1 against · 15 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.
90th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.
- SF 2259 Relating to damages owed by a person at fault in crashes and collisions involving commerci…89th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage · similarCleared committee
Matched by the wording of each bill’s explanation, or an identical title. Companion bills and renumbered versions of this bill aren’t listed; they’re the same bill.