Bills › 90th General Assembly

Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and county supervisor vacancies, and including effective date provisions

Topics:Cities & counties

Same legislation: HF 116, HF 281, SF 443

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 25, 2023
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 21, 2023
  3. Done: Senate committeeFebruary 13, 2023
  4. Skipped: Passes the SenateContinued as SF 443
  5. Next: House committee
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Became SF 443 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 443 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary Counties with at least 60,000 people must elect their supervisors from specific districts rather than voting for them all at once. Smaller counties can no longer use certain election methods and must choose between two other options. Additionally, if a seat on the board of supervisors becomes empty, a special election must be held to fill it instead of just appointing someone.1

Read the official explanation

This bill concerns county supervisor representation plans and county supervisor vacancies. DIVISION I —— PLAN “THREE” COUNTY SUPERVISOR REPRESENTATION PLANS. This division requires a county with a population of 60,000 or more based on the most recent federal decennial census to use plan “three” for the election of county supervisors. Plan “three” requires individual members of the board of supervisors for that county to be elected from single-member equal-population districts. The bill provides that a county with a population of 60,000 or more as of the effective date of the bill, that does not use plan “three” as of that date for the election of supervisors shall not be required to elect supervisors under plan “three” until the election for supervisors in 2024 following adoption of a representation plan in conformity with the provisions of law governing the adoption of a plan “three” representation plan. DIVISION II —— PLAN “TWO” COUNTY SUPERVISOR REPRESENTATION PLANS. This division eliminates the option for counties to use plan “two” for the election of county supervisors. Plan “two” requires individual members of the board of supervisors for that county to be elected at large with equal-population district residence requirements. The bill provides that a county with a population of under 60,000 as of the effective date of the bill, that uses plan “two” as of that date for the election of supervisors shall not be required to elect supervisors under plan “one” or “three” until the election for supervisors in 2024. The bill requires the board of supervisors of a county subject to the requirements of the division to adopt either plan “one” or plan “three” by resolution within days of the effective date of the bill. If plan “three” is adopted, the county shall adopt a plan “three” representation plan in conformity with the provisions of law governing the adoption of a plan “three” representation plan to be used for the election of supervisors in 2024. DIVISION III —— COUNTY SUPERVISOR VACANCIES. This division requires vacancies on the board of supervisors to be filled by special election. Current law allows for vacancies to be filled by appointment under certain circumstances. DIVISION IV —— EFFECTIVE DATE. The bill takes effect upon enactment.

Changed since by amendments H-1132, H-1131, S-3038; see Amendments.

Full bill text2

Senate subcommittee

Named February 21, 2023. On February 22, 2023 it recommended passage. [].

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

1 written public comment to its subcommittee: February 1, 2023 (1) · on the Legislature’s site

Fiscal note

AI summary This bill requires counties with populations over 125,000 to use a specific district plan for electing supervisors and mandates that vacancies on a board of supervisors be filled by special election. For the three counties changing their district plans, the total one-time cost for fiscal year 2024 is estimated to be between $120,000 and $240,000. Additionally, counties holding special elections for supervisor vacancies may spend between $1,000 and $185,000 per county for each election, though the frequency of these vacancies cannot be estimated.3

Read the fiscal note

Description

Senate File 443 relates to county redistricting plans and makes the following changes:

  • Division I requires counties with a population greater than 125,000 to use plan “three” for election supervisors. Counties with a population of 125,000 or more based on the most recent federal decennial census that do not use plan “three” for the election of supervisors, as of the effective date of this Bill, are required to commence plan “three” for the election of supervisors in the 2024 general election.
  • Counties are required to establish a temporary county redistricting commission to adopt a representation plan no later than 30 days after the effective date of this Bill or May 15, 2023. The plan is required to be submitted to the Secretary of State’s office no later than November 1, 2023, and will become effective January 1, 2024.
  • Division II requires vacancies on a board of supervisors to be filled by special election.
  • Division III makes the Bill effective upon enactment.

Background

Under Iowa Code section 331.206, county redistricting plans are selected by the county board of supervisors or by special election (Iowa Code section 331.207). The three types of plans are as follows:

  • Plan “one” — Election at large and without district residence requirements for the members.
  • Plan “two” — Election at large but with equal-population district residence requirements for the members.
  • Plan “three” — Election from single-member equal-population districts in which the electors of each district shall elect one member who must reside in that district. Currently, there are five counties with a population of 125,000 or greater that would be required to use plan “three.” Of the five counties, three will be changing from plan “one” to plan “three,” and two already use plan “three.”

Iowa Code section 69.14A allows for the vacancies to be filled by appointment under certain circumstances.

Assumptions

Division I

  • Counties that operate under plan “one” are Scott, Johnson, and Black Hawk. These counties will experience an estimated cost between $40,000 and $80,000 per county to conform their district plans to that of plan “three.” The estimated cost will cover training, additional precincts, conforming ballots, and the mailing of new voter registration cards to all eligible voters within the county.
  • Counties that operate under plan “three” are Polk and Linn. These counties will see no additional cost.

Division II

Counties that are required to hold special elections as a result of vacancies for their board of supervisors may experience an estimated cost per county between $1,000 and $185,000, depending on the number of registered voters in the county. However, the frequency and location of these vacancies cannot be estimated.

Fiscal Impact

Division I

For the three counties required to change from plan “one” to plan “three,” the one-time cost per county is estimated to be between $40,000 and $80,000 for a total one-time cost between $120,000 and $240,000 for FY 2024.

Division II

Counties who hold special elections for their board of supervisors may make expenditures between $1,000 and $185,000 per county for each special election held.

Source

  • Iowa State Association of Counties

How the estimate changed

  1. $480,000 March 1, 2023
  2. $480,000 March 6, 2023
  3. $240,000 March 10, 2023
4

Reading a fiscal note5

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§331.201§331.203§331.204§331.206§331.207§331.209§331.210A§331.214§43.6§49.3§69.14A

Repeals§331.210

How the Code works6

Lobbying

2 for · 5 against · 5 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in 2 earlier General Assemblies. A version became law.

  • HF 2466 Concerning signature requirements for county supervisor candidate nominations and includin…
    89th General Assembly · Signed by Governor · very similar
    Became law
  • HF 218 Concerning county supervisor representation plans, and including effective date provisions
    89th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage · similar
    Cleared committee
  • HF 216 Concerning county supervisor representation plans
    88th General Assembly · In committee · similar
    Cleared committee

Similar bills this General Assembly

  • HF 2179 Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and coun…
    90th General Assembly · In committee
    Nearly identical
  • SF 2061 Relating to county supervisor representation plans, and including effective date provision…
    90th General Assembly · In committee
    Very similar
  • SF 2283 Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and coun…
    90th General Assembly · Approved by committee
    Very similar
  • SF 2439 Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and coun…
    90th General Assembly · Passed Senate
    Similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.