Concerning signature requirements for county supervisor candidate nominations and including effective date provisions

Where it is now

1. ✓
   Done: IntroducedFebruary 18, 2022
2. –
   Skipped: SubcommitteeSkipped
3. ✓
   Done: House committeeMarch 15, 2022
4. ✓
   Done: Passes the HouseMarch 15, 202296–0
5. ✓
   Done: Senate committeeMarch 16, 2022
6. ✓
   Done: Passes the SenateMarch 22, 202249–0
7. ✓
   Done: To the GovernorMarch 22, 2022
8. ✓
   Done: Signed into lawMarch 22, 2022

Signed into law What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill requires a county with a population of 60,000 or more based on the most recent federal decennial census to use plan “three” for the election of county supervisors. Plan “three” requires individual members of the board of supervisors for that county to be elected from single-member equal-population districts. The bill provides that a county with a population of 60,000 or more as of July 1, 2022, that does not use plan “three” as of that date for the election of supervisors shall not be required to elect supervisors under plan “three” until the election for supervisors in 2024 following adoption of a representation plan in conformity with the provisions of law governing the adoption of a plan “three” representation plan.

From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text · What changed before it passed

Senate subcommittee

Named March 16, 2022. It hasn’t reported yet.

• Sen. R. Smith
• Sen. Tony Bisignano DEmail
• Sen. et al

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Fiscal note

Cost: up to $250,000 Compare with other bills

The Bill is estimated to increase county supervisor election costs by a minimum of $250,000 in 2024. The cost is derived from the setup of additional precinct locations. There may be additional precinct locations that need setup; however, these expenses are unknown. There may also be additional costs related to further stratification of ballots; however, this cost cannot be estimated at this time.

• County Redistricting Plans · March 14, 2022

Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§331.206§331.207

Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works

Family tree

Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.

Similar bills

• SF 2061 Relating to county supervisor representation plans, and including effective date provision…
  90th General Assembly · In committee
  Very similar
• SF 2283 Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and coun…
  90th General Assembly · Approved by committee
  Very similar
• HF 116 Concerning county supervisor representation plans and including effective date provisions
  90th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 281
  Very similar
• SF 2439 Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and coun…
  90th General Assembly · Passed Senate
  Similar

Matched by the wording of each bill’s explanation, or an identical title. Companion bills and renumbered versions of this bill aren’t listed; they’re the same bill.