Bills › 90th General Assembly

SF 2439Died when the session ended · April 18, 2024

Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and county supervisor vacancies, and including effective date provisions

Sponsored by the Senate Ways and Means Committee

Topics:Cities & counties

Same legislation: SSB 3204

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedApril 4, 2024
  2. Done: SubcommitteeApril 4, 2024
  3. Done: Senate committeeApril 10, 2024
  4. Done: Passes the SenateApril 18, 202432–15
  5. Stopped: House committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The 2024 session adjourned on April 19, 2024, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary Counties with at least 125,000 people must use a specific system where supervisors are elected from districts with equal populations. These large counties must also hold special elections to fill any empty seats on their board of supervisors instead of using appointments. Smaller counties will continue to fill vacancies through appointments as they do now.1

Read the official explanation

This bill concerns county supervisor representation plans and county supervisor vacancies. DIVISION I —— PLAN “THREE” COUNTY SUPERVISOR REPRESENTATION PLANS. This division requires a county with a population of 125,000 or more based on the most recent federal decennial census to use plan “three” for the election of county supervisors. Plan “three” requires individual members of the board of supervisors for that county to be elected from single-member equal-population districts. The bill provides that a county with a population of 125,000 or more as of the effective date of the bill, that does not use plan “three” as of that date for the election of supervisors shall not be required to elect supervisors under plan “three” until the election for supervisors in 2026 following adoption of a representation plan in conformity with the provisions of law governing the adoption of a plan “three” representation plan. DIVISION II —— COUNTY SUPERVISOR VACANCIES. This division requires vacancies on the board of supervisors to be filled by special election in a county with a population of 125,000 or more. Current law allows for vacancies to be filled by appointment under certain circumstances. The bill requires vacancies to be filled by appointment in a county with a population of less than 125,000 in accordance with current law, including a vacancy that is treated as a resignation due to the physical or mental status of a supervisor. DIVISION III —— EFFECTIVE DATE. The bill takes effect upon enactment.

Full bill text2

Senate subcommittee

Named April 4, 2024 (as SSB 3204). On April 8, 2024 it recommended passage. [].

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Fiscal note

Cost: up to $240,000 Compare with other bills

AI summary This bill changes how certain counties redistrict for supervisor elections and how vacancies on those boards are filled. For the three counties required to change their election plan, there is a one-time cost of between $120,000 and $240,000 for fiscal year 2025. Additionally, counties that must hold special elections to fill supervisor vacancies may incur a cost of between $15,000 and $90,000 for each special election held.3

Read the fiscal note

Description

Senate File 2439 relates to county redistricting plans. The Bill is organized into three divisions.

Division I

This Division requires counties with a population of 125,000 or more based on the most recent federal decennial census to use plan “three” for the election of supervisors. The Bill provides that a county with a population of 125,000 or more as of the effective date of this Bill that does not use plan “three” as of the effective date for the election of supervisors is not required to elect supervisors under plan “three” until the election of supervisors in 2026. This Division also requires counties to establish a temporary county redistricting commission to adopt a representation plan by the later of 30 days after the effective date of this Bill or May 15, 2024. The plan is required to be submitted to the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) no later than November 1, 2024, and will become effective January 1, 2025.

Division II

This Division defines how a vacancy on a board of supervisors is to be filled. A county with a population of less than 125,000 based on the most recent federal decennial census is required to fill the vacancy by appointment by the committee of county officers. A county with a population of 125,000 or more based on the most recent federal decennial census is required to fill the vacancy with a special election.

Division III

This Division makes the Bill effective upon enactment.

Background

Currently, Iowa Code section 331.206 requires county redistricting plans to be selected by the county board of supervisors or by special election as provided in Iowa Code section 331.207. The three plans used for the election of supervisors are as follows:

  • Plan “one” — election at large without district residence requirements for the members.
  • Plan “two” — election at large but with equal-population district residence requirements for the members.
  • Plan “three” — election from single-member equal-population districts, in which the electors of each district shall elect one member who must reside in that district. Currently, there are five counties with a population of 125,000 or more that would be required to use plan “three.” Three of the five counties, Black Hawk, Johnson, and Scott, will be changing from plan “one” to plan “three,” and two of the five counties, Linn and Polk, already use plan “three.”

Iowa Code section 69.14A allows for the vacancies to be filled by appointment under certain circumstances.

Assumptions

Division I

  • The three counties changing from plan “one” to plan “three” will experience an estimated cost between $40,000 and $80,000 per county to conform their district to plan “three.” The estimated cost will cover training, additional precincts, conforming ballots, and the mailing of new voter registration cards to all eligible voters within the county.
  • There will be no additional costs to the two counties currently using plan “three.”

Division II

Counties that are required to hold special elections as a result of vacancies for their boards of supervisors are estimated to cost between $15,000 and $90,000 per county per election. The frequency of elections per county cannot be estimated.

Fiscal Impact

Division I

For the three counties required to change from plan “one” to plan “three” under Division I, the one-time cost per county is estimated to be between $40,000 and $80,000 for a total one-time cost of between $120,000 and $240,000 for FY 2025.

Division II

Counties that hold special elections for their boards of supervisors under Division II may incur a cost of between $15,000 and $90,000 for each special election held in each county.

Source

  • Iowa State Associations of Counties

Reading a fiscal note4

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§331.201§331.206§331.207§331.214§43.6§69.14A

How the Code works5

Lobbying

1 for · 4 against · 3 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Tried before

This idea has been filed in 2 earlier General Assemblies. A version became law.

  • HF 2466 Concerning signature requirements for county supervisor candidate nominations and includin…
    89th General Assembly · Signed by Governor · similar
    Became law
  • HF 218 Concerning county supervisor representation plans, and including effective date provisions
    89th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage · similar
    Cleared committee
  • HF 216 Concerning county supervisor representation plans
    88th General Assembly · In committee · similar
    Cleared committee

Similar bills this General Assembly

  • SF 2283 Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and coun…
    90th General Assembly · Approved by committee
    Nearly identical
  • SF 2061 Relating to county supervisor representation plans, and including effective date provision…
    90th General Assembly · In committee
    Similar
  • HF 116 Concerning county supervisor representation plans and including effective date provisions
    90th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 281
    Similar
  • HF 2179 Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and coun…
    90th General Assembly · In committee
    Similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.