Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General

SF 2338Retirado · HF 2592 se hizo ley en su lugar · 25 de marzo de 2024

Relating to the placement of a police officer on a Brady-Giglio list, including the right of a police officer to petition the court and the standard of proof required for actions regarding such placement

Presentado por el comité Judiciary del Senado

Temas:Courts & civil lawCrime & corrections

La misma legislación: SF 2200, HF 2295, HF 2592

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado1 de febrero de 2024
  2. Hecho: Subcomité7 de febrero de 2024
  3. Hecho: Comité del Senado14 de febrero de 2024
  4. Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado25 de marzo de 202447–0
  5. Se saltó: Comité de la CámaraSe saltó
  6. Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara29 de febrero de 202491–1
  7. Hecho: A gobernador(a)23 de abril de 2024
  8. Hecho: Firmado como ley1 de mayo de 2024

HF 2592 se hizo ley → La misma legislación se aprobó como HF 2592, así que esta versión se dejó de lado. Ir a HF 2592 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA Police officers can now ask a judge to review a prosecutor's decision to put them on a special list or refuse to prosecute their cases. A court will look at the evidence privately to decide if the prosecutor's decision should be changed or if the officer should be removed from the list. This law also sets the standard for how much proof is needed during these legal challenges. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to the right of a police officer to petition the court regarding placement on a Brady-Giglio list by a prosecuting agency, and establishes the standard of proof required for actions under Code chapter 80F. The bill provides that an officer shall have the right to petition the district court, appeal, or intervene in an action regarding a prosecuting agency’s decision to place an officer on a Brady-Giglio list or for refusing to prosecute cases involving the officer. The district court has jurisdiction over the review of the prosecuting agency’s decision. The district court shall perform an in camera review of the evidence and may hold a closed hearing upon the request of the officer or prosecuting agency, or upon the court’s own motion. The court may affirm, modify, or reverse a prosecuting agency’s decision, and issue orders or provide relief, including removal of the officer from a Brady-Giglio list. Evidence presented to the district court shall be provided under seal and kept confidential unless otherwise provided by law and ordered by the district court. The bill provides that the standard of proof for an allegation, administrative charge, complaint, cause of action, claim, or defense under Code chapter 80F shall be a preponderance of the evidence unless a higher standard of proof is required by law.

Cambiado después por las enmiendas S-5092, H-8085; vea Enmiendas.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse2

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§80F.3

Modifica§80F.1

Cómo funciona el Código3

Cabildeo

4 a favor · 1 en contra · 9 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree