Bills › HF 2592 › What changed
What changed in HF 2592
The bill as introduced, compared with the version both chambers passed (90th General Assembly).
1 passage reworded, 0 added and 0 removed; 5 of 6 unchanged.
Removed AddedIntroduced textText as passedAmendments
Compares wording only. The printed bills also mark changes to existing law with strikes and underlines, which aren’t shown here.
Section 1. Section 80F.1, Code 2024, is amended by adding the following new subsection:
NEW SUBSECTION.
25. An officer shall have the right to petition the district court, appeal, or intervene in an action regarding a prosecuting agency’s decision to place an officer on a Brady-Giglio list. The district court shall have jurisdiction over the review of the prosecuting agency’s decision. The district court shall perform an in camera review of the of the evidence and may hold a closed hearing upon the request of the officer or prosecuting agency, or upon the court’s own motion. The district court may affirm, modify, or reverse a prosecuting agency’s decision, and issue orders or provide relief, including removal of the officer from a Brady-Giglio list, as justice may require. Evidence presented to the district court shall be provided under seal and kept confidential unless otherwise provided by law and ordered by the district court.
Sec.
2.
NEW SECTION. 80F.3 Standard of proof. The standard of proof for an allegation, administrative charge, complaint, cause of action, claim, or defense under this chapter shall be a preponderance of the evidence unless a higher standard of proof is required by law.