Bills › 90th General Assembly

SF 2325Died when the session ended · March 4, 2024

Relating to city civil service employees and related procedures and including effective date provisions

Sponsored by the Senate Local Government (successor To Sf 231) Committee

Topics:Courts & civil lawCities & countiesPublic safety & emergencies

Same legislation: SF 231, HSB 197, SF 457

Write your legislators about it

Also covers SF 231 and HSB 197 and SF 457.

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 8, 2023
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 13, 2023
  3. Done: Senate committeeFebruary 28, 2023
  4. Done: Passes the SenateMarch 4, 202437–9
  5. Done: House committeeMarch 12, 2024
  6. Stopped: Passes the HouseDied when the General Assembly ended
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The 2024 session adjourned on April 19, 2024, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary Cities with civil service commissions would no longer be allowed to create boards for citizens to review police officer conduct. The law also changes how many civil service commissioners a city must have based on its population. Additionally, it updates the rules for how city employees can be disciplined or how they can appeal those decisions in court.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to city civil service. The bill prohibits a city with a civil service commission established under Code chapter 400 from adopting, enforcing, or otherwise administering an ordinance, motion, resolution, or amendment, or using any other means, to establish a board or other entity for the purpose of citizen review of the conduct of police officers. The bill strikes language authorizing a city council to establish, by ordinance, the number of civil service commissioners at not less than three in a city having a population of more than 70,000. The bill requires a city council in a city having a population of more than 50,000 to establish, by ordinance, the number of civil service commissioners at not less than five and not more than seven. The bill modifies standards and procedures for the removal, discharge, demotion, or suspension of a city civil service employee. The bill modifies standards and procedures for appeals of such actions to a city civil service commission, including procedures and standards for hearings on such appeals and procedures applicable before such hearings are held. The bill also modifies standards and procedures for appeal of such decisions by a city civil service commission to the district court, including modifying the applicable scope of review and providing for reasonable attorney fees, expert fees, and costs and expenses to be awarded to a city civil service employee who substantially prevails in such an appeal. The bill takes effect upon enactment.

Changed since by amendment S-5038; see Amendments.

Full bill text2

House subcommittee

Named March 6, 2024. On March 7, 2024 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 2-1.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Fiscal note

AI summary This bill changes the rules for city civil service commissions and how employee disciplinary actions are handled and appealed. It is estimated to increase stipend costs for cities by a statewide total of $200 annually beginning in fiscal year 2024. The bill is also expected to increase costs for local governments through employee remedies and attorney fees, and it may increase costs for the Judicial Branch due to more trials, though these specific amounts cannot be estimated.3

Read the fiscal note

Requestor: Senator Janice Weiner

Description

Senate File 457 relates to city civil service commissions. The Bill does the following:

  • The Bill requires cities with a population of 50,000 or more to have between five and seven commissioners and requires the Mayor, with the approval of the city council, to appoint five commissioners in a city with a population of at least 50,000 and with a paid fire department or a paid police department. Removes language mandating not less than three civil service commissioners for cities with a population of 70,000 or more.
  • Provides that an employee with civil service rights may not be unreasonably or unjustly subject to disciplinary action, but may be subject to disciplinary actions due to an act or failure to act by the employee that violates a clearly established law or reasonable city policies or department rules. The Bill strikes language in current law providing that an employee with civil service rights not be disciplined for arbitrary reasons, but is subject to disciplinary actions for a variety of reasons, including when, based on the judgment of the person imposing disciplinary action, the employee is unsuitable or unfit for employment.
  • Allows an appointing authority to peremptorily impose disciplinary action on a subordinate, upon presentation of reasonable and just grounds, due to any proven act or failure to act by the employee that is in violation of established law or city policies or is immediately detrimental to the public. Strikes language in current law allowing an appointing authority to immediately impose disciplinary action on a subordinate for a variety of reasons, including when, in the judgment of the authority, the employee is unsuitable or unfit for employment.
  • Places the burden of proof for disciplinary action against an employee on the city, prohibits a person from knowingly withholding evidence from an employee charged with a violation, and allows the commission to deliberate in closed session upon request of the employee.
  • Provides that the commission only consider, order, or impose discipline upon the employee for charges proven by the city, and provides that the commission reverse any city decision with prejudice if the city fails to meet its burden of proof.
  • Requires the commission to base decisions on a majority vote and make any decision in writing, including any reasoning and facts involved, and to make any decision within 30 days of the close of the hearing or trial, with exceptions.
  • Strikes language providing that an appeal of the commission’s decision to district court be an appellate review without a trial, and instead provides that the review will be a trial.
  • Provides that the district court may award a prevailing employee, in addition to other remedies or relief, reasonable attorney and expert fees and other expenses. The Bill takes effect upon enactment.

Background

Iowa Code chapter 400 details laws around civil service commissions, qualifications for employees under civil service, and appeals for employees under civil service. Civil service provisions apply to full-time police officers and fire fighters and to all full-time employees except certain appointed positions, department heads, and employees funded through temporary revenues. Currently, cities with a population of more than 8,000 in the State and with a paid fire department or paid police department are required to have three civil service commissioners. Cities with a population of 70,000 or above may set, by ordinance, the number of commissioners, with a minimum of three. The following cities have a population of at least 50,000:

  • Des Moines
  • Cedar Rapids
  • Davenport
  • Sioux City
  • Iowa City
  • Ankeny
  • West Des Moines
  • Ames
  • Waterloo
  • Council Bluffs
  • Dubuque

Assumptions

  • The number of civil service commissioners in cities with a population of 50,000 or more will increase by a total of 16 statewide.
  • Stipend costs are expected to increase by a statewide total of $200 annually beginning in fiscal year (FY) 2024 due to the new commissioners.
  • Due to the Bill allowing new trials and shifting the burden of proof toward cities, the number of district court trials is expected to increase. The number cannot be estimated due to a lack of data.
  • The length of each trial is expected to last one day and cost the Judicial Branch approximately $1,500 per day.
  • City attorney and other costs for trial are expected to be absorbed within current salaries and revenue streams.
  • It is assumed that 20.0% of employees per year statewide, beginning in FY 2024, will win their cases and receive remedies, relief, and attorney fees averaging $10,000 each. The costs are borne by local governments.

Fiscal Impact

The potential fiscal impact of the Bill is illustrated in Figure 1, which shows a range based on the number of annual trials statewide attributed to the Bill.

Figure 1 — Estimated Costs, Senate File 457 The Bill is also expected to increase the costs of training Civil Service Commissioners for local governments in an amount that cannot be determined due to lack of data.

Sources

  • Iowa Judicial Branch
  • City of West Des Moines
  • City of Des Moines
  • City of Council Bluffs
  • Sioux City
  • City of Ankeny
  • City of Ames
  • Iowa City
  • City of Cedar Rapids
  • City of Waterloo
  • City of Davenport
  • City of Dubuque
  • Legislative Services Agency

Reading a fiscal note4

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§400.22A

Amends§364.3§400.1§400.18§400.19§400.23§400.24§400.26§400.27

How the Code works5

Lobbying

4 for · 11 against · 14 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Similar bills

  • HSB 82 Relating to city civil service employees and related procedures and including effective da…
    91st General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 641
    Nearly identical

Matched by wording or an identical title.