Bills › 90th General Assembly
Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and county supervisor vacancies, and including effective date provisions
Topics:Cities & counties
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 8, 2024
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 8, 2024
- Done: Senate committeeFebruary 13, 2024
- Stopped: Passes the SenateDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: House committee
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2024 session adjourned on April 19, 2024, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Counties with at least 125,000 people must eventually use a specific system where supervisors are elected from districts with equal populations. If a large county does not already use this system, they have until the 2026 election to switch. Additionally, this law changes how empty seats on a board of supervisors are filled by requiring a special election instead of an appointment.1
Read the official explanation
This bill concerns county supervisor representation plans and county supervisor vacancies. DIVISION I —— PLAN “THREE” COUNTY SUPERVISOR REPRESENTATION PLANS. This division requires a county with a population of 125,000 or more based on the most recent federal decennial census to use plan “three” for the election of county supervisors. Plan “three” requires individual members of the board of supervisors for that county to be elected from single-member equal-population districts. The bill provides that a county with a population of 125,000 or more as of the effective date of the bill, that does not use plan “three” as of that date for the election of supervisors shall not be required to elect supervisors under plan “three” until the election for supervisors in 2026 following adoption of a representation plan in conformity with the provisions of law governing the adoption of a plan “three” representation plan. DIVISION II —— COUNTY SUPERVISOR VACANCIES. This division requires vacancies on the board of supervisors to be filled by special election. Current law allows for vacancies to be filled by appointment under certain circumstances. DIVISION III —— EFFECTIVE DATE. The bill takes effect upon enactment.
Senate subcommittee
Named February 8, 2024. On February 13, 2024 it recommended passage. [].
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
1 written public comment to its subcommittee: February 12, 2024 (1) · on the Legislature’s site
Fiscal note
Cost: up to $240,000 Compare with other bills
AI summary This bill requires certain large counties to change how they elect supervisors and mandates special elections to fill vacancies on those boards. For the three counties changing their election plans, there is an estimated one-time cost between $120,000 and $240,000 for fiscal year 2025. Additionally, counties holding special elections for supervisor vacancies may incur a cost of between $1,000 and $185,000 for each election held.3
Read the fiscal note
Description
Senate File 2283 relates to county redistricting plans. The Bill is organized into three divisions:
Division I
This Division requires counties with a population of 125,000 or more based on the most recent federal decennial census that do not use plan “three” for the election of supervisors, as of the effective date of this Bill, to commence plan “three” for the election of supervisors in the 2024 general election.
This Division also requires counties to establish a temporary county redistricting commission to adopt a representation plan by the later of 30 days after the effective date of this Bill or May 15, 2024. The plan is required to be submitted to the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) no later than November 1, 2024, and will become effective January 1, 2025.
Division II
This Division requires vacancies on a board of supervisors to be filled by special election.
Division III
This Division makes the Bill effective upon enactment.
Background
Under Iowa Code section 331.206, county redistricting plans are selected by the county board of supervisors or by special election (Iowa Code section 331.207). The three types of plans are as follows:
- Plan “one” — Election at large and without district residence requirements for the members.
- Plan “two” — Election at large but with equal-population district residence requirements for the members.
- Plan “three” — Election from single-member equal-population districts in which the electors of each district shall elect one member who must reside in that district. Currently, there are five counties with a population of 125,000 or more that would be required to use plan “three.” Of the five counties, three, Black Hawk, Johnson, and Scott, will be changing from plan “one” to plan “three,” and two, Linn and Polk, already use plan “three.” Iowa Code section 69.14A allows for the vacancies to be filled by appointment under certain circumstances.
Assumptions
Division I
- The three counties changing from plan “one” to plan “three” will experience an estimated cost between $40,000 and $80,000 per county to conform their district to plan “three.” The estimated cost will cover training, additional precincts, conforming ballots, and the mailing of new voter registration cards to all eligible voters within the county.
- There will be no additional costs to the two counties currently using plan “three.”
Division II
Counties that are required to hold special elections as a result of vacancies for their boards of supervisors may experience an estimated cost per county between $1,000 and $185,000, depending on the number of registered voters in the county. The frequency and location of these vacancies cannot be estimated.
Fiscal Impact
Division I
For the three counties required to change from plan “one” to plan “three” under Division I, the one-time cost per county is estimated to be between $40,000 and $80,000 for a total one-time cost between $120,000 and $240,000 for FY 2025.
Division II
Counties that hold special elections for their boards of supervisors pursuant to Division II may incur a cost of between $1,000 and $185,000 for each special election held in each county.
Source
- Iowa State Association of Counties
- County Supervisor Districts · February 28, 2024 · $240,000
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
1 for · 2 against · 4 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Tried before
90th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in 2 earlier General Assemblies. A version became law.
- HF 2466 Concerning signature requirements for county supervisor candidate nominations and includin…89th General Assembly · Signed by Governor · very similarBecame law
- HF 218 Concerning county supervisor representation plans, and including effective date provisions89th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage · similarCleared committee
- HF 216 Concerning county supervisor representation plans88th General Assembly · In committee · similarCleared committee
Similar bills this General Assembly
- SF 2439 Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and coun…90th General Assembly · Passed SenateNearly identical
- SF 2061 Relating to county supervisor representation plans, and including effective date provision…90th General Assembly · In committeeVery similar
- HF 116 Concerning county supervisor representation plans and including effective date provisions90th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 281Very similar
- HF 2179 Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and coun…90th General Assembly · In committeeSimilar
Matched by wording or an identical title.