Bills › 90th General Assembly

Relating to the placement of a police officer on a Brady-Giglio list, including the right of a police officer to petition the court and the standard of proof required for actions regarding such placement

Topics:Courts & civil lawCrime & corrections

Same legislation: HF 2295, SF 2338, HF 2592

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 1, 2024
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 7, 2024
  3. Done: Senate committeeFebruary 14, 2024
  4. Skipped: Passes the SenateContinued as SF 2338
  5. Next: House committee
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Became SF 2338 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 2338 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary Police officers can now ask a judge to review decisions made by prosecutors regarding their placement on certain disciplinary lists. If an officer believes a prosecutor's decision was wrong, a court can look at the evidence privately and decide whether to change or reverse that decision. This new process also sets a specific standard for how much evidence is needed to prove a claim in these cases.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to the right of a police officer to petition the court regarding placement on a Brady-Giglio list by a prosecuting agency, and establishes the standard of proof required for actions under Code chapter 80F. The bill provides that an officer shall have the right to petition the district court, appeal, or intervene in an action regarding a prosecuting agency’s decision to place an officer on a Brady-Giglio list or for refusing to prosecute cases involving the officer. The district court has jurisdiction over the review of the prosecuting agency’s decision. The district court shall perform an in camera review of the evidence and may hold a closed hearing upon the request of the officer or prosecuting agency, or upon the court’s own motion. The court may affirm, modify, or reverse a prosecuting agency’s decision, and issue orders or provide relief, including removal of the officer from a Brady-Giglio list. Evidence presented to the district court shall be provided under seal and kept confidential unless otherwise provided by law and ordered by the district court. The bill provides that the standard of proof for an allegation, administrative charge, complaint, cause of action, claim, or defense under Code chapter 80F shall be a preponderance of the evidence unless a higher standard of proof is required by law.

Changed since by amendments S-5092, H-8085; see Amendments.

Full bill text · What changed before it passed2

Senate subcommittee

Named February 7, 2024. On February 13, 2024 it recommended passage. [].

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§80F.3

Amends§80F.1

How the Code works3

Lobbying

4 for · 1 against · 9 undecided · Who →

Family tree