Bills › 90th General Assembly

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedMarch 2, 2023
  2. Done: SubcommitteeMarch 14, 2024
  3. Done: House committeeMarch 7, 2024
  4. Skipped: Passes the HouseContinued as HF 2681
  5. Next: Senate committee
  6. Next: Passes the Senate
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Became HF 2681 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to HF 2681 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary Cities and counties can use automated systems to catch speeding drivers on major roads if they get permission from the Department of Transportation. These local governments must follow specific rules for where to put the equipment, how to maintain it, and how to warn drivers with signs. Every year, local officials must report to the state to show if the systems are actually working.1

Read the official explanation

In 2014, the department of transportation (DOT) adopted administrative rules authorizing and regulating the use of automated traffic enforcement (ATE) systems on the primary road system. After judicial review, the Iowa supreme court ruled the DOT did not have authority to adopt rules regulating the use of ATE systems. This bill codifies the previously adopted DOT rules, other than those relating to the use of ATE systems monitoring official traffic-control devices. The bill applies only to automated enforcement used by local jurisdictions to monitor and enforce excessive speed violations on the primary road system. The DOT is prohibited from using automated enforcement or receiving related payments from local jurisdictions. _____ seeking to use automated enforcement is required to receive approval from the DOT. A local jurisdiction is required to submit a justification report, detailing the need for automated enforcement based on factors described in the bill. The DOT must approve or deny a local jurisdiction’s request within days, unless additional time is needed to gather more data or conduct a speed study. If the DOT approves a request, the DOT must prepare an agreement which must be signed by the department and the local jurisdiction. The bill requires ATE systems to be installed and maintained in a safe manner and limits the locations on or along a roadway where the ATE system is permitted to be installed. The ATE systems must be calibrated quarterly, and if a mobile ATE system is used, it must be calibrated before each use at a new location. Local jurisdictions are required to post signs in advance of locations where ATE systems are used to advise drivers of such systems. Each year, a local jurisdiction that uses automated enforcement must evaluate the effectiveness of the ATE system and report its findings to the DOT on or before May 1. The DOT must review the annual reports and determine whether continued use of automated enforcement is justified. The DOT is authorized to require a local jurisdiction to remove or modify an ATE system in a particular location. A local jurisdiction may appeal a decision made by the DOT by submitting a written explanation of the issue and any supporting information to the director of the DOT. Once the director receives the appeal, the director has days to respond. The director’s decision is final agency action. Automated enforcement must be used in conjunction with conventional law enforcement methods, not as a replacement for law enforcement officer contact.

Changed since by amendments S-5141, H-8292, H-8286; see Amendments.

Full bill text · What changed before it passed2

House subcommittee

Named March 14, 2024. On March 20, 2024 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 3-0.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

88 written public comments to its subcommittee: February 28, 2023 (88) · on the Legislature’s site

Fiscal note

AI summary This bill regulates how local authorities use automated or remote systems, such as cameras, to issue citations for speeding violations. It is estimated to reduce local revenue for the city of Buffalo by $121,000 and for the city of LeClaire by $341,000 due to the loss of mobile systems. The full fiscal impact of the bill across all local authorities cannot be estimated.3

Read the fiscal note

Description

House File 2681 regulates the use of automated or remote systems for traffic law enforcement (ATE system).

Division I — Automated or Remote Systems for Traffic Law Enforcement — Automatic

Registration Plate Readers

“Automated or remote system for traffic law enforcement” is defined in the Bill as a camera or other optical device designed to work in conjunction with a speed measuring device to detect motor vehicles being operated in violation of the speed limit, the use of which results in the issuance of citations sent through the mail or by electronic means.

Division I requires local authorities to hold a valid permit from the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) before using an ATE system. The DOT is required to adopt administrative rules for the ATE systems. The DOT is authorized to determine whether an ATE system is appropriate and necessary and the least restrictive means to address the traffic safety issues at a location. The Bill establishes requirements that must be included in an application for a permit. A local authority is only authorized to use an ATE system to issue citations for traffic violations exceeding the speed limit by greater than 10 miles per hour. A local authority with a population of 20,000 or less is prohibited from using a mobile ATE system to issue citations but may issue warnings for violations detected by a mobile ATE system.

Data collected by automatic registration plate readers must be deleted within 30 days with exceptions for certain circumstances. A person who violates these automatic registration plate reader requirements commits a simple misdemeanor.

Division I of the Bill provides for signage and reporting requirements for ATE systems. The Bill also provides requirements for the installation and maintenance of an ATE system, including the requirement for a monthly calibration of an ATE system. The Bill requires a local authority using an ATE system to provide an annual report by March 1 to the DOT and to post on the local authority’s website detailing the number of traffic collisions and accidents that occurred at each location an ATE system is used, the number of citations issued, and any other relevant information.

Local authorities are required to review and approve a recorded photograph or video of a violation captured by an ATE system before a citation or warning is issued. For excessive speed violations detected by an ATE system, the citation amount must not exceed $75 for speeds greater than 10 miles and up to 20 miles per hour over the speed limit, $100 for speeds greater than 20 and up to 25 miles per hour over the speed limit, $250 for speeds greater than 25 and up to 30 miles per hour over the speed limit, and $500 for speeds greater than 30 miles per hour over the speed limit. These amounts are doubled if the violation occurs in a road work zone. All violations detected by an ATE system are civil infractions.

Division I requires local authorities to use revenue received from the use of an ATE system, minus the costs to install, operate, and maintain the system, to fund transportation infrastructure improvement projects or to offset costs related to the operation of a police or fire department. Division II — Existing Systems To continue to operate ATE systems that were used prior to January 1, 2024, a local authority is required to submit a list of ATE system locations and justifications for placement and use to the DOT by July 1, 2024. The DOT is required to issue a permit by October 1, 2024, to every local authority that provides valid submissions. A local authority using an ATE system prior to January 1, 2024, may continue to use the ATE system until a permit is received unless it is a mobile ATE system prohibited under the Bill. If a local authority has not been issued a permit by October 1, 2024, the local authority must cease using all ATE systems until the local authority obtains a permit. A local authority using an ATE system at a location for the first time on or after January 1, 2024, shall not be issued a permit by the DOT before July 1, 2026. Division II of the Bill takes effect upon enactment.

Background

As of January 2024, the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) is aware of 25 cities and towns in Iowa that operate an ATE system or systems, including Sioux City, Cedar Rapids, Davenport, Muscatine, Fort Dodge, Council Bluffs, Des Moines, Waterloo, Fayette, West Union, LeClaire, Strawberry Point, Hazleton, Hudson, Chester, Buffalo, Bellevue, Miles, Independence, Oelwein, Prairie City, Webster City, Marshalltown, Marion, and Postville. Data is not available at this time regarding the use of ATE systems in additional cities or towns. As of January 15, 2024, the LSA obtained data from Cedar Rapids, Council Bluffs, Davenport, Des Moines, LeClaire, Muscatine, Waterloo, Buffalo, Fayette, and Marshalltown regarding their current ATE systems. Sioux City recently changed its ATE system provider and does not have accurate data for a full year. Of the 25 cities and towns that currently operate an ATE system, 15 have populations of less than 20,000; however, the number of cities and towns that operate mobile ATEs is unknown. Figure 1 provides data obtained by the LSA related to the number of ATE devices, base cost per violation, vendors’ share of revenues, and local authorities’ share of revenues for the last full fiscal year. Figure 2 shows each city’s use of ATE system revenue.

Figure 1 — Data Provided for Fiscal Year 2023 Figure 2 — Local Uses for ATE System Revenue A simple misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than 30 days and a fine of at least $105 but not more than $855.

Assumptions

  • The number of cities and towns that currently operate ATE systems is unknown.
  • It is unknown how many local authorities with ATE systems that were used prior to January 1, 2024, will receive a permit from the DOT by October 1, 2024, for continued use of their ATE systems.
  • Local jurisdictions may be required to reduce the amount charged for a single citation for speeding violations as provided in the Bill.
  • For cities with a population of less than 20,000, the local authority revenue collected annually by mobile ATEs is in proportion to the number of mobile ATEs the local authority has as a percentage of that total number of operating ATEs. Revenue to the cities of Buffalo and LeClaire will be reduced by 33.0% and 20.0%, respectively, due to the removal of mobile ATE systems.
  • Marginal costs for county jails cannot be estimated due to a lack of data. For purposes of this analysis, the marginal cost for county jails is assumed to be $50 per day.

Correctional Impact

House File 2681 creates a new simple misdemeanor, and the correctional impact cannot be estimated for the Bill due to a lack of existing conviction data. A conviction for a simple misdemeanor does not result in a prison sentence but does carry the possibility of confinement in jail for up to 30 days. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Cost Estimates Used for Correctional Impact Statements, dated January 16, 2024, for information related to the correctional system.

Minority Impact

House File 2681 creates a new offense. As a result, the Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning (CJJP) of the Department of Management cannot use existing data to estimate the minority impact of the Bill. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Minority Impact Statement, dated January 16, 2024, for information related to minorities in the criminal justice system.

Fiscal Impact

House File 2681 is estimated to reduce local revenue by $121,000 to the city of Buffalo and $341,000 to the city of LeClaire due to the loss of the mobile ATE system. However, the full fiscal impact of the Bill across all localities cannot be estimated.

Sources

  • Department of Transportation
  • Local authorities
  • Legislative Services Agency calculations

How the estimate changed

  1. $362,813 April 8, 2024
  2. $341,000 April 12, 2024
  3. $341,000 May 9, 2024 · final
4

Reading a fiscal note5

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§321P.1§321P.10§321P.11§321P.12§321P.2§321P.3§321P.4§321P.5§321P.6§321P.7§321P.8§321P.9

How the Code works6

Lobbying

7 for · 4 against · 17 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Similar bills

  • HSB 161 HSB 161
    90th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 629
    Nearly identical

Matched by wording or an identical title.