Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General
HSB 153
Temas:State governmentPublic safety & emergenciesTechnology & privacy
La misma legislación: HF 554
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado9 de febrero de 2023
- Hecho: Subcomité9 de febrero de 2023
- Hecho: Comité de la Cámara28 de febrero de 2023
- Se saltó: Lo aprueba la CámaraSigue como HF 554
- Sigue: Comité del Senado
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Ahora es HF 554 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a HF 554 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA State and local governments, including cities and school districts, are prohibited from using taxpayer money to pay people who carry out ransomware attacks. If an attack happens, these government groups must quickly notify the state's chief information officer. While payments to attackers are generally banned, the state may allow them during extreme emergencies or permit the use of funds for cybersecurity insurance. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill prohibits the state or a political subdivision of the state from expending revenue received from taxpayers for payment to persons responsible for ransomware attacks.24. “Critical infrastructure” includes but is not limited to buildings, structures, offices, lines, poles, pipes, and equipment, as well as real and personal property owned or used to provide fire fighting, law enforcement, medical, or other emergency services. The bill defines “encryption” as the use of an algorithmic process to transform data into a form in which the data is rendered unreadable or unusable without the use of a confidential process or key. The bill defines “political subdivision” as a city, county, township, or school district.1, or the use of any form of software that results in the unauthorized encryption of data, the denial of access to data, the denial of access to a computer, or the denial of access to a computer system. _____ and discovers the attack, the state or political subdivision shall expeditiously provide notice to the office of the chief information officer. The office of the chief information officer shall adopt rules establishing notification procedures. The bill provides that the state or a political subdivision of the state shall not expend revenue received from taxpayers for payment to a person responsible for, or reasonably believed to be responsible for, a ransomware attack. The bill allows the office of the chief information officer to authorize such expenditures in the event of a critical or emergency situation as determined by the department of homeland security and emergency management. The bill provides that information related to a political subdivision’s insurance coverage for cybersecurity or ransomware attack shall be considered confidential records. The bill provides that the state or a political subdivision of the state may use taxpayer revenue to pay for cybersecurity insurance or related ransomware insurance if the state or political subdivision first exhausts all other reasonable means of mitigating a potential ransomware attack. The bill includes a legislative intent section, which provides that it is the intent of the general assembly that the state and political subdivisions of the state have tested cybersecurity mitigation plans and policies. The bill takes effect July 1, 2024, except for the section of the bill requiring the office of the chief information officer to prepare a notice of intended action (NOIA) for the adoption of rules, which takes effect upon enactment. The NOIA must be submitted to the administrative rules coordinator and administrative code editor as soon as possible and no later than October 1, 2023.5(2)(b).
House subcommittee
Named February 9, 2023. On February 23, 2023 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 2-0.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Modifica§8B.4
Cabildeo
0 a favor · 0 en contra · 26 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Tried before
Study bill
90th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.
- HSB 691 HSB 69189th General Assembly · In committee · same titleCleared committee
Matched by wording or an identical title.