Bills › 90th General Assembly
Prohibiting the state or a political subdivision of the state from expending revenue received from taxpayers for payment to persons responsible for ransomware attacks, and including effective date provisions
Sponsored by the House Economic Growth and Technology Committee
Topics:Business & economyCities & countiesTechnology & privacy
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedMarch 2, 2023
- Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 16, 2024
- Stopped: House committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: Senate committee
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The General Assembly adjourned on April 19, 2024. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
This bill prohibits the state or a political subdivision of the state from expending revenue received from taxpayers for payment to persons responsible for ransomware attacks.24. “Critical infrastructure” includes but is not limited to buildings, structures, offices, lines, poles, pipes, and equipment, as well as real and personal property owned or used to provide fire fighting, law enforcement, medical, or other emergency services. The bill defines “encryption” as the use of an algorithmic process to transform data into a form in which the data is rendered unreadable or unusable without the use of a confidential process or key.
Read the full explanation
The bill defines “political subdivision” as a city, county, township, or school district.1, or the use of any form of software that results in the unauthorized encryption of data, the denial of access to data, the denial of access to a computer, or the denial of access to a computer system. The bill requires that when the state or a political subdivision of the state is subject to a ransomware attack and discovers the attack, the state or political subdivision shall expeditiously provide notice to the office of the chief information officer. The office of the chief information officer shall adopt rules establishing notification procedures. The bill provides that the state or a political subdivision of the state shall not expend revenue received from taxpayers for payment to a person responsible for, or reasonably believed to be responsible for, a ransomware attack. The bill allows the office of the chief information officer to authorize such expenditures in the event of a critical or emergency situation as determined by the department of homeland security and emergency management and requires the office of the chief information officer to notify the departments of the expenditures. The bill provides that information related to a political subdivision’s insurance coverage for cybersecurity or ransomware attack shall be considered confidential records. The bill provides that the state or a political subdivision of the state may use taxpayer revenue to pay for cybersecurity insurance or related ransomware insurance at any time if the state or political subdivision first exhausts all other reasonable means of mitigating a potential ransomware attack. The bill includes a legislative intent section, which provides that it is the intent of the general assembly that the state and political subdivisions of the state have tested cybersecurity mitigation plans and policies. The bill takes effect July 1, 2024, except for the section of the bill requiring the office of the chief information officer to prepare a notice of intended action (NOIA) for the adoption of rules, which takes effect upon enactment. The NOIA must be submitted to the administrative rules coordinator and administrative code editor as soon as possible and no later than October 1, 2023.5(2)(b).
From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text
House subcommittee
Named January 16, 2024. On February 1, 2024 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 2-1.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Iowa Code it changes
Creates§8H.1§8H.2§8H.3§8H.4§8H.5
Amends§8B.4
Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works
Lobbying
0 for · 0 against · 19 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.
Tried before
90th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None became law, though one got through a chamber.
- SF 2391 Prohibiting the state or a political subdivision of the state from expending revenue recei…88th General Assembly · Passed Senate · same titlePassed a chamber
Matched by the wording of each bill’s explanation, or an identical title. Companion bills and renumbered versions of this bill aren’t listed; they’re the same bill.