Bills › 90th General Assembly
Prohibiting the state or a political subdivision of the state from expending revenue received from taxpayers for payment to persons responsible for ransomware attacks, and including effective date provisions
Sponsored by the House Economic Growth and Technology Committee
Topics:State governmentPublic safety & emergenciesTechnology & privacy
Same legislation: HSB 153
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 9, 2023
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 9, 2023
- Done: House committeeFebruary 28, 2023
- Stopped: Passes the HouseDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: Senate committee
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2024 session adjourned on April 19, 2024, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary State and local governments, including cities and school districts, are prohibited from using taxpayer money to pay people who carry out ransomware attacks. If an attack happens, these government groups must quickly notify the state's chief information officer. While payments to attackers are generally banned, the chief information officer can authorize them during extreme emergencies.1
Read the official explanation
This bill prohibits the state or a political subdivision of the state from expending revenue received from taxpayers for payment to persons responsible for ransomware attacks.24. “Critical infrastructure” includes but is not limited to buildings, structures, offices, lines, poles, pipes, and equipment, as well as real and personal property owned or used to provide fire fighting, law enforcement, medical, or other emergency services. The bill defines “encryption” as the use of an algorithmic process to transform data into a form in which the data is rendered unreadable or unusable without the use of a confidential process or key. The bill defines “political subdivision” as a city, county, township, or school district.1, or the use of any form of software that results in the unauthorized encryption of data, the denial of access to data, the denial of access to a computer, or the denial of access to a computer system. The bill requires that when the state or a political subdivision of the state is subject to a ransomware attack and discovers the attack, the state or political subdivision shall expeditiously provide notice to the office of the chief information officer. The office of the chief information officer shall adopt rules establishing notification procedures. The bill provides that the state or a political subdivision of the state shall not expend revenue received from taxpayers for payment to a person responsible for, or reasonably believed to be responsible for, a ransomware attack. The bill allows the office of the chief information officer to authorize such expenditures in the event of a critical or emergency situation as determined by the department of homeland security and emergency management and requires the office of the chief information officer to notify the departments of the expenditures. The bill provides that information related to a political subdivision’s insurance coverage for cybersecurity or ransomware attack shall be considered confidential records. The bill provides that the state or a political subdivision of the state may use taxpayer revenue to pay for cybersecurity insurance or related ransomware insurance at any time if the state or political subdivision first exhausts all other reasonable means of mitigating a potential ransomware attack. The bill includes a legislative intent section, which provides that it is the intent of the general assembly that the state and political subdivisions of the state have tested cybersecurity mitigation plans and policies. The bill takes effect July 1, 2024, except for the section of the bill requiring the office of the chief information officer to prepare a notice of intended action (NOIA) for the adoption of rules, which takes effect upon enactment. The NOIA must be submitted to the administrative rules coordinator and administrative code editor as soon as possible and no later than October 1, 2023.5(2)(b).
House subcommittee
Named January 16, 2024. On February 1, 2024 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 2-1.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Iowa Code it changes
Creates§8H.1§8H.2§8H.3§8H.4§8H.5
Amends§8B.4
Lobbying
0 for · 0 against · 26 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Study bill
90th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in 2 earlier General Assemblies. None became law, though one got through a chamber.
- HSB 691 HSB 69189th General Assembly · In committee · same titleCleared committee
- SF 2391 Prohibiting the state or a political subdivision of the state from expending revenue recei…88th General Assembly · Passed Senate · same titlePassed a chamber
Matched by wording or an identical title.