Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General
Relating to the placement of a police officer on a Brady-Giglio list, including the right of a police officer to petition the court and the standard of proof required for actions regarding such placement
Presentado por el comité Public Safety de la Cámara
Temas:Courts & civil lawCrime & correctionsPublic safety & emergencies
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado1 de febrero de 2024
- Hecho: Subcomité8 de febrero de 2024
- Hecho: Comité de la Cámara14 de febrero de 2024
- Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara29 de febrero de 202491–1
- Hecho: Comité del Senado14 de marzo de 2024
- Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado25 de marzo de 202447–0
- Hecho: A gobernador(a)23 de abril de 2024
- Hecho: Firmado como ley1 de mayo de 2024
Firmado como ley ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA Police officers can now ask a judge to review a decision if a prosecutor puts them on a special list regarding their credibility. A court will look at the evidence privately to decide if the officer should be removed from that list. This change also sets a specific rule for how much proof is needed during these legal cases. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to the right of a police officer to petition the court regarding placement on a Brady-Giglio list by a prosecuting agency, and establishes the standard of proof required for actions under Code chapter 80F. The bill provides that an officer shall have the right to petition the district court, appeal, or intervene in an action regarding a prosecuting agency’s decision to place an officer on a Brady-Giglio list. The district court has jurisdiction over the review of the prosecuting agency’s decision. The district court shall perform an in camera review of the evidence and may hold a closed hearing upon the request of the officer or prosecuting agency, or upon the court’s own motion. The court may affirm, modify, or reverse a prosecuting agency’s decision, and issue orders or provide relief, including removal of the officer from a Brady-Giglio list. Evidence presented to the district court shall be provided under seal and kept confidential unless otherwise provided by law and ordered by the district court. The bill provides that the standard of proof for an allegation, administrative charge, complaint, cause of action, claim, or defense under Code chapter 80F shall be a preponderance of the evidence unless a higher standard of proof is required by law.
Por qué importa. Police officers would gain the right to petition a district court to challenge a prosecutor's decision to place them on a Brady-Giglio list. The court would review the evidence and has the authority to affirm, modify, or reverse these decisions, including ordering an officer's removal from the list. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)2
Cambiado después por las enmiendas S-5092, H-8085; vea Enmiendas.
Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse3
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Crea§80F.3
Modifica§80F.1
Cabildeo
4 a favor · 1 en contra · 9 indecisos · Quiénes →