Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General
Relating to the standard of judicial review and providing a claim or defense when a state action burdens a person’s exercise of religion, and including effective date provisions
Temas:Courts & civil law
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado8 de febrero de 2023
- Se detuvo: SubcomitéMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: Comité del Senado
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2024 terminó el 19 de abril de 2024, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA If a government rule makes it difficult for someone to practice their religion, courts would have to use a stricter test to decide if that rule is allowed. To keep such a rule, the government must prove it has a very important reason for it and that there is no other way to achieve its goal without interfering with religion. People can use this rule to defend themselves or make a claim in court if they feel their religious freedom is being limited. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to the standard of judicial review when a state action burdens a person’s exercise of religion. Under current law, a court is not required to apply heightened scrutiny when reviewing a law that burdens a person’s exercise of religion when such law is generally applicable. The bill provides that a court shall apply the compelling interest test set forth in Sherbert v. 398 (1963), and Wisconsin v. 205 (1972), in such cases, so that government action cannot substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion unless the government demonstrates that applying the law of general applicability is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest. The bill provides that a person whose exercise of religion has been burdened by government action may assert such violation as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding. The bill takes effect upon enactment.
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
6 a favor · 14 en contra · 1 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Tried before
90th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in 2 earlier General Assemblies. None got through a chamber.
- SF 436 Relating to the standard of judicial review and providing a claim or defense when a state …89th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage · very similarCleared committee
- HF 258 Relating to the standard of judicial review and providing a claim or defense when a state …88th General Assembly · In committee · same titleCleared committee
- SF 240 Relating to the standard of judicial review and providing a claim or defense when a state …88th General Assembly · Renumbered as SF 508 · same titleCleared committee
- SF 508 Relating to the standard of judicial review and providing a claim or defense when a state …88th General Assembly · Approved by committee · very similarCleared committee
Matched by wording or an identical title.