Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General

Relating to the placement of a police officer on a Brady-Giglio list, including the right of a police officer to petition the court and the standard of proof required for actions regarding such placement

Temas:Courts & civil lawPublic safety & emergencies

La misma legislación: SF 2200, SF 2338, HF 2592

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado1 de febrero de 2024
  2. Hecho: Subcomité8 de febrero de 2024
  3. Hecho: Comité de la Cámara14 de febrero de 2024
  4. Se saltó: Lo aprueba la CámaraSigue como HF 2592
  5. Sigue: Comité del Senado
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Ahora es HF 2592 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a HF 2592 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA Police officers can now ask a judge to review a decision if a prosecutor puts them on a special list that tracks their credibility. A court can look at private evidence to decide if the officer should be removed from that list. This change also sets a specific rule for how much proof is needed during these legal disagreements. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to the right of a police officer to petition the court regarding placement on a Brady-Giglio list by a prosecuting agency, and establishes the standard of proof required for actions under Code chapter 80F. The bill provides that an officer shall have the right to petition the district court, appeal, or intervene in an action regarding a prosecuting agency’s decision to place an officer on a Brady-Giglio list or for refusing to prosecute cases involving the officer. The district court has jurisdiction over the review of the prosecuting agency’s decision. The district court shall perform an in camera review of the evidence and may hold a closed hearing upon the request of the officer or prosecuting agency, or upon the court’s own motion. The court may affirm, modify, or reverse a prosecuting agency’s decision, and issue orders or provide relief, including removal of the officer from a Brady-Giglio list. Evidence presented to the district court shall be provided under seal and kept confidential unless otherwise provided by law and ordered by the district court. The bill provides that the standard of proof for an allegation, administrative charge, complaint, cause of action, claim, or defense under Code chapter 80F shall be a preponderance of the evidence unless a higher standard of proof is required by law.

Cambiado después por las enmiendas S-5092, H-8085; vea Enmiendas.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse2

House subcommittee

Named February 8, 2024. On February 13, 2024 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 3-0.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§80F.3

Modifica§80F.1

Cómo funciona el Código3

Cabildeo

4 a favor · 1 en contra · 9 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree