Bills › 90th General Assembly
Requiring vehicle identification information to be provided in a no-contact or protective order, and making penalties applicable
Topics:Courts & civil lawCrime & correctionsPublic safety & emergencies
Same legislation: HF 556
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 1, 2023
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 7, 2023
- Done: House committeeFebruary 28, 2023
- Skipped: Passes the HouseContinued as HF 556
- Next: Senate committee
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Became HF 556 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to HF 556 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
12, or arrested for domestic abuse assault, older individual assault, harassment, stalking, sexual abuse in the first, second, or third degree, or any other public offense for which there is a victim, and the person is brought before a magistrate for initial appearance, the magistrate must enter a no-contact order if the magistrate finds probable cause that any public offense or a violation of a no-contact order, protective order, or consent agreement has occurred and the presence of or contact with the defendant poses a threat to the safety of the alleged victim, persons residing with the alleged victim, or members of the alleged victim’s family.
Read the full explanation
2D). This bill requires a defendant or respondent, as applicable, to provide identification information regarding any motor vehicle, vehicle, or vessel the defendant or respondent owns or operates, including the make, model, model year, color, and vehicle registration plate number, if applicable. A defendant or respondent must also provide identification information about a vehicle or vessel the defendant or respondent operates in the regular course of the defendant’s or respondent’s employment or occupation and a vehicle or vessel owned by or registered to another person in the defendant’s or respondent’s household. The defendant or respondent must file the identification information with the clerk of court within days after receiving service of the no-contact order or protective order. The clerk of court must notify the court if the identification information is not timely filed. Following the initial filing of the identification information, the defendant or respondent must provide to the clerk of court any new or updated identification information within five business days of the change in identification information occurring. A defendant or respondent who fails to timely file the identification information or who fails to timely notify the clerk of court of any new or updated identification information must be held in contempt of court and punished pursuant to Code chapter 665. A person held in contempt under Code chapter 665 by a district judge, district associate judge, or an associate juvenile judge may be ordered to pay a fine not exceeding $500 or imprisoned in a county jail for up to six months, or both. A person held in contempt by a judicial magistrate may be ordered to pay a fine not exceeding $100 or imprisoned in a county jail for up to days.
From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text
House subcommittee
Named February 7, 2023. On February 14, 2023 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 2-0.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Fiscal note
The Judicial Branch estimates the Bill would result in a one-time cost of $120,000 for computer programming in FY 2024 and an estimated increase in annual operating costs of approximately $245,000 beginning in FY 2025. Table 1 shows the breakdown of estimated annual costs.
- Victims, Vehicle Identification · March 28, 2023
Nonpartisan cost estimates from the Legislative Services Agency’s Fiscal Services Division. The newest is first. Reading a fiscal note
Iowa Code it changes
Creates§664A.3A
Amends§664A.2
Read from the bill as introduced. Each links to every bill touching that chapter of the Iowa Code. How the Code works
Lobbying
0 for · 5 against · 6 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Where this legislation came from and where it went: earlier tries, the versions it moved through this Assembly, and later bills built on it.
Tried before
90th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title; check the text to be sure it’s the same idea.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None became law, though one got through a chamber.
- HF 2346 Requiring vehicle identification information to be provided in a no-contact or protective …89th General Assembly · Passed House · nearly identicalPassed a chamber
Matched by the wording of each bill’s explanation, or an identical title. Companion bills and renumbered versions of this bill aren’t listed; they’re the same bill.